Portfolio Project Section 3 - PMO Recommendations The purpose of the Portfolio Project is to synthesize current research about the project management office (PMO) for the purpose of developing a PMO r

Portfolio Project

Section 3 - PMO Recommendations

The purpose of the Portfolio Project is to synthesize current research about the project management office (PMO) for the purpose of developing a PMO recommendation. The Portfolio Project is structured to help you demonstrate understanding of the course material, as well as the implications of new knowledge gained from research beyond the course readings and lectures.

Your Portfolio Project will be developed in three independent but cohesive sections, which considered in whole constitutes your PMO recommendation. The three sections are:

    • Section 1: Subject Organization and Rationale

    • Section 2: PMO Mission, Charter, and Competency

    • Section 3: PMO Recommendations

Sections 1 and 2 will be submitted as Portfolio Project milestones in Modules 3 and 6, respectively.

Section 3 will constitute your final Portfolio Project assignment, which due at the end of the course in Module 8.

Based on your Section 1 choice, one of the two PMO recommendation options will be performed for your Portfolio Project assignment, which are described as:

Option #1: Recommendation for the implementation of a new PMO

- or -

Option #2: Recommendation for the advancement of an existing PMO

For Section 1 (submitted in Week 3): Subject Organization and Rationale of the Portfolio Project, you are required to select a subject organization for developing a PMO recommendation. The subject organization must have an international/global aspect and may be your workplace, an organization that you are familiar with, or an organization that is based on your research.

For Option 1, the subject organization must exhibit the characteristics and attributes of a viable candidate for benefiting from a PMO.

For Option 2, the subject organization must exhibit a functioning PMO as qualified by the PMO competency continuum.

A key aspect of the Portfolio Project Section 1 is to secure instructor approval for the Portfolio Project subject organization selected, which is required before commencing with subsequent Portfolio Project sections.

Based on your research of the subject organization, substantively address the following key elements:

  • Subject organization information:

    • Organization name

    • Organization's mission, vision, and values statement

    • Industry type and organization demographics

    • Description of organization's culture

    • Executive sponsor and key stakeholders

  • PMO business case:

    • Assessment of existing project management:

      • Project management methods

      • Project management tools

      • Project management experience

      • Project management maturity

    • Perceived PMO benefits for the organization:

      • Overarching business rationale

      • Long term measurable goals (2-3)

      • First year specific goals and metrics

      • Quantified value proposition (short and long term)

For Section 2 (submitted in Week 6): PMO Mission, Charter, and Competency of the Portfolio Project, you will build on the information detailed in your Portfolio Project Section 1. Based on analysis of your subject organization and further research, purpose the PMO's mission and vision, PMO charter, and PMO competency continuum stage resultant from your Option 1 or Option 2 recommendation. To this end, substantively address the following key elements for your subject organization's PMO recommendation:

  • Develop the PMO's Mission and Vision including:

    • State the PMO' mission and vision.

    • Validate alignment with subject organization's mission and vision.

    • Designate key PMO stakeholders.

  • Develop the PMO's Charter:

    • State the PMO's business purpose.

    • Describe the PMO's business alignment and affiliation.

    • Designate the PMO's empowerment authority.

    • Describe the PMO's fiscal management.

    • Identify the Charter approval.

  • Relate to the PMO competency continuum

    • Designate the PMO competency continuum stage.

    • Justify the subject organization's designated PMO competency continuum stage determination.

    • Correlate the designated PMO competency continuum stage to the Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3).

For Section 3 (submitted in Week 8): PMO Recommendations of the Portfolio Project, you will build on the information detailed in your Portfolio Project Sections 1 and 2. Based on analysis of your subject organization and further research, develop either Option 1 or Option 2 recommendations for key aspects of the PMO that optimally support the subject organization's PMO framework as designated in Section 2. To this end, substantively address the following key elements for your subject organization's PMO recommendation:

  • Designate recommendations, with appropriate rationale, for each of the following PMO key elements:

    • PMO type

    • PMO structure

    • PMO culture

    • PMO project methods

    • PMO project tools

    • PMO governance

    • PMO risk management

    • PMO business integration

    • PMO global challenges

    • Other relevant PMO considerations

  • Recommend professional development for PMO advancement

    • Apply aspects of the project manager competency development (PMCD) framework for the PMO's professional development.

    • Designate professional certification requirements.

    • Describe mentorship role.

    • Identify project and portfolio leadership

Submit your Section 3 Portfolio Project final assignment as a single Microsoft Word document to the Module 8 submissions area established for this purpose.

Your essay should address the following requirements:

  • Your well-written PMO recommendation essay thesis should be 8-10 pages in length, which does not include the title, reference, or appendix pages. You need to add headings and subheadings associated with each of the bullet points listed in the Section 3 requirements.

  • Format your presentation according to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.), which should include an introduction and conclusion.

  • Include title and reference pages.

  • In addition to your course textbook, cite at least four current (published within the past 5 years) scholarly resources (peer-reviewed, official governmental reports, and other scholarly source) to support your suppositions, assertions, and conclusions. To enhance your learning experience, scholarly resources are available from the CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.).

  • Include an appendix for tables and figures as appropriate.

Please write clearly, concisely, and cohesively; use section level headers to organize the key elements of your thesis.

PJM560 Mod 8 PP

PJM560 Mod 8 PP

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

15 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

9 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the issue, construction material strategies and concepts; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of course concepts regarding PMO recommendations, with appropriate rationale, for each of the PMO key elements. Includes strong analysis regarding recommendations of professional development for PMO advancement.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis, interpretation, and evaluation.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis, interpretation, and evaluation.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of the information given.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts regarding the recommendations for key aspects of the PMO that optimally support the subject organization’s PMO framework.

24 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

18 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

12 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least 4 credible and current (published within the past 5 years) scholarly resources (peer-reviewed, official governmental reports, and other scholarly source).

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates 3-4 credible sources.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates 2-3 credible source.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates less than 2 credible sources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format. Conforms to project requirements.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.

24 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.

18 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.

12 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.

30 pts

Total Points: 175