Assessment 1: Research paper review and question solution (up to 2000 words). Part 1: Please provide

Manuscript Review

Reviewer’s Information (your details)

Title of the reviewer
First Name:
Last Name:
Affiliation:	N/A
Country:
Specialization:

Reviewer’s Blind Review Comments to Author (11)

Kindly enter your comments based on the following sections, as appropriate. May include text excerpt or row / page no. from the manuscript for ease of reference by the author.

Please add the Manuscript number / Title of the paper you choose to review.

1.	Originality:	<<provide your comments on how original is the research being conducted e.g. is it contributing to new knowledge, reinvent the wheel etc.>>
2.	Scientific Quality:	<<provide your comments on the manuscript’s quality from the scientific viewpoints>>
4.	General Comment:	<<provide the key observations / salient points that you can discover from the manuscript>>
5.	Abstract:	<<provide your comments which include: purpose, design /methodology / approach, findings, limitations / implications, originality / value & keywords of the abstract>>
6.	Introduction:	<<provide your comments which include: background information, research problem, research objective(s), research question(s)>>
7.	Literature Review:	<<provide your comments on the adequacy of the literature reviewed, the use of updated literature, underpinning theory / theoretical frameworks etc.>>
8.	Methodology:	<<provide your comments on how the research / study is being conducted e.g. conceptual framework / research model, operationalization of the constructs / variables, research design / method, types of instrument used, sampling, data collection approach, proposed data analysis techniques / tools etc.>>
9.	Results:	<<provide your comments on the empirical findings / evidences which include accuracy, reliability, validity etc.>>
10.	Discussions:	<<provide your comments on the points discussed & justified by the author>>
11.	Conclusions:	<<provide your comments on the research limitations, future research recommendation and conclusion of the manuscript>>
12.	References / Bibliography:	<<provide your comments inclusive references / bibliography are following the appropriate format e.g. APA, MLA, Harvard etc., tally with & matching the citations in the manuscript’s body text etc.>>
16.	Reviewer’s Decision Comment:	<<provide overall evaluation on the manuscript>>

Please rate the following, as appropriate: (1 = Excellent) (2 = Good) (3 = Fair) (4 = Poor) (7)

1.	Originality
2.	Scientific Quality
3.	Relevance to the Field(s) of Journal
4.	Depth Of Research
5.	Abstract
6.	Introduction
7.	Literature Review
8.	Methodology
9.	Results
10.	Discussions
11.	Conclusions
12.	References / Bibliography
13.	Figures
14.	Tables
15.	Clarity of Presentation
	Total Score:

Recommandations (2)

Kindly mark with an X

Accept As Is:
Requires Minor Corrections:
Requires Moderate Revision:
Requires Major Revision:
Rejection (Please provide reasons)