Final Essay Choose at least two of the ten theorists we have discussed this semester. Compare and contrast them by:(1) explaining their theories, while focusing on their similarities and differences,

Assessment Rubric for Final Essay

 

Exemplary 4 points

Accomplished 3 points

Developing  2 points

Beginning 1 point

Theoretical Content

Demonstrates

solid understanding of

the major themes by

using readings and lectures to define concepts.

Arguments are placed within the broad discussions outlined in the course.

Concepts are defined, but the author does not

demonstrate a solid

understanding of the major

themes relevant to the argument.

Concepts are poorly

defined. Course readings were mentioned but with little demonstration of a solid understanding.

Concepts are left undefined.

Paper mentions

course readings,

but there is little

demonstration of

understanding.

Logic and Coherence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theories and central concepts are clearly presented. Arguments are supported with three or more relevant details and information. Uses key quotations from the readings.

 

Theories and central concepts are presented correctly. Arguments are supported with at least two relevant information. Use some quotations from the readings.

 

Theories and central concepts are presented but not discussed. Limited use of primary and/or secondary readings.

 

 

 

Theories and central concepts are present incorrectly, or does not use quotations from primary readings or does not do so effectively. Details are missing, information is unclear. Limited use of primary or secondary readings to support the idea.

Application of Theories and Concepts

Theories were utilized effectively to make sense of the arguments. Conclusions are presented with appropriate evidence. Clearly and creatively compares and contrasts the various theorists.

Adequately utilize theory to make sense of the case in a thoughtful manner. Conclusions are support with evidences. Adequately compares and/or contrasts the various theorists.

Limited utilization of theory to make sense of their arguments. Conclusions are supported with limited evidence. Inadequately compares and/or contrasts the various theorists.

No theory is selected, described, or used effectively. No compare and contrast was done of the theories.

Quality of Writing

Clear organization which includes an introduction, and transition sentences to

connect major ideas, and

conclusion. There are few and/or grammatical or spelling errors. Ideas and evidence are correctly cited.

Clear organization, with

introduction, transitions and conclusion. There are

several grammatical and/or

spelling errors. Ideas and

evidence are correctly cited.

Organization is

unclear or without

necessary components.

Significant grammatical and/or spelling errors .

Ideas and evidence not are

correctly cited.

Little discernable

organization.

More than three significant

grammar and

spelling errors.

Ideas and

evidence are not

correctly cited, or

not cited at all.