Need to get this assignment done, there are two attachments, the first attachment (Research Investigation Progress Check 2) should be based on the second attachment (The week question Evaluation). No

10

The week question Evaluation

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Instructor’s Name

Course Name

Date

Week 3 Question 1

In the textbox provided, brainstorm a list of keywords related to your topic.

Answer

  • Modern technology and effect of humans’

  • Social media and the effect of humans’ technology and relationships

  • How Technology affects

  • Human relationships

  • The Effect of Technology on Relationships

  • Social media and family time

Week 3 Question 2

Now type those keywords into an Internet search engine, such as Google. Spend some time looking through the results. In the textbox below, jot down the titles and hyperlinks of a few of the most interesting articles and websites that come up in your search. Write down at least one article and the corresponding hyperlink for each keyword or group of keywords.

Answer

  • Isolation, dangers and etiquette.

  • Article

  • How Technology Affects Human Relationships by Bryan Kramer

  • Hyperlink corresponding: Impact on how we view others.

Impact of Social Media Addiction in Families

Hyperlink corresponding: On their screens

Week 3 Question 3

What are you finding? What new information have you learned about this issue? What new questions or thoughts do you have now that you have done some preliminary research?

Answer

I am finding pros and cons to modern technology and also the pros and cons it has on family time. I have learned that social media/ modern technology is happening more, which means less face to face conversations. People are also using the internet to have their conflicts and or difference addressed but not keeping in mind the emotional state this could place them in. I also have learned that it is leading to more obesity and less physical activities. I would like to know what are some thoughts or ideas that parents can do to protect their children from the harm of the internet.

Week 3 Question 4

Can you narrow your focus at all? If so, what do you wish to focus on? If you have a few options, what are they? (You don't necessarily need to narrow your focus. Mark found this helpful to do because his topic is very broad.)

Answer

I don't think my topic is very broad. My topic asks how modern technology affects personal relationships and family time. To me this all is hand in hand. Social media, Google, Skype, yahoo, email, and etc. are all modern technology and all affect personal relationships in either a positive or negative way.

Week 3 Question 5

Based on the broad search, refine the list of keywords that you created on the previous page. List here any keywords or keyword combinations that returned results that are relevant to your social science issue. Then, note which keywords or combinations you will no longer use, as they returned off-topic or overly broad results.

Answer

  • Modern technology and the effect of humans

  • Social media and the effect of humans

  • Technology and relationships

  • The effects of technology on relationships

  • I will not use the ones above any more

  • I will still use

  • How technology affects human relationships

  • Social media and family time

  • Modern technology's effect on family time

Week 3 Question 6

What professional organizations (other than social science organizations) might have relevant information about your issue? For example, someone researching war might utilize information provided by the United States Department of Defense. Find 1-2 organizations, and note them here.

Answer

  • Stanford University

  • Harvard Business Review

Week 3 Question 7

Now select one of the digital libraries or organizations mentioned in this learning block (Shapiro Library, Google Scholar, etc.), and plug your keywords into that site. What credible sources come up in your search? Repeat this step with at least one more digital library/organization. In the textbox, type the titles of 6-8 of the most relevant results along with the corresponding hyperlinks so you can locate these resources later. Note which digital library/organization you used to find each study.

Answer

Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction Author Noelle Chesley

http://wiley.force.com/Interface/ContactJournalCustomerServices_V2.

Computers, the Internet, and Families Review of the Role New Technology Plays in Family Life

Show all authors ROBERT HUGHES ROBERT HUGHES University of Missouri-Columbia See all articles by this author Search Google Scholar for this author JASON D. HANS JASON D. HANS

http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/computer/p23-155/p23-155.pdf

Living in a house of cards: Family experiences with long-term childhood technology dependence* Author links open overlay panel Maureen E.O'BrienPhD, RN

https://doi.org/10.1053/jpdn.2001.20548

Week 3 Question 8

Collect any information, links, articles, reports, or other resources that are relevant to your issue and capture this additional information in the text box below. Again, be sure to include links to your resources so you can easily locate them later.

Answer

  • Mobile device addiction linked to depression, anxiety

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160302121325.htm

  • Is Technology Producing A Decline In Critical Thinking And Analysis?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090128092341.htm

  • Teens with more screen time have lower-quality relationships

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100301165614.htm

Week 3 Question 9

Begin by noting the title of the resource and including a link to it.

Is this source current? Note the publication date or a date indicating when the content was last updated. Answer in complete sentences, being sure to include supporting evidence from your source to support your conclusions.

Answer

Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction Author Noelle Chesley

http://wiley.force.com/Interface/ContactJournalCustomerServices_V2

This source is not current, it was written in 2005. I do not think this will be a reliable source for my research. The date is outdated, doesn't have the accreditation, and more opinion based more than facts.

Week 3 Question 10

Is this source relevant? Note the portion of the text that you believe clearly relates to your research question. Consider whether this source provides an overview of the issue you are interested in, or whether it makes some specific important point.

Answer

It is not relevant. The source is outdated and not many facts. I do believe the portion that does relate to my topic is when it talks about boundaries between technology and family time. It also states that technology helps bring work home and home to work. This helps balance the work life with family if there is an overload of work to be done. This data still is researched in 2000 and was written in 2005. I believe I can find a more up to date article that will have more facts and up to date with the new technology and the generation.

Week 3 Question 11

Is this source accurate? Note whether the source has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or credible organization, and the organization's name. Note whether the source includes a list of references and citations. Give your opinion on the source's presentation ‐ is it clear, organized, professional, and free of errors?

Answer

Yes this was written by the University of Wisconsin. References were clearly stated and numbered at 49. The citations also were clearly stated and numbered at 103. It is very clear, organized, and professional. I do think it is to outdated and too many opinions and not enough facts. If it could be re wrote, they should use the cited material more and use the facts instead of stating opinions.

Week 3 Question 12

Is this source authoritative? Note the author's credentials. If no author is given, note whether the publishing organization is credible and the organization's name again.

Answer

The source names the author, which is Noelle Chesley. Organization is The University of Wisconsin. There are no credentials for the author but the University of Wisconsin is credible.

Week 3 Question 13

Are there any red flags that make you concerned that this source may not be scholarly? For example, are there any clearly biased passages? Are the references all very old? Are there many spelling and grammatical errors? Note any and all concerns you may have.

Answer

I do have red flags that make me concerned that this source may not be scholarly. There are plenty of biased passages in this article. Also the references are very old. The article alone is very old. Not to many spelling and grammatical errors. Also the author did not have any credentials.