Motivation Of Behavior B. F. Skinner built on the classic behavioristic principles to develop his theory on human behavior. His theory has since been expanded and applied in many practical areas. Th
Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Education
98 points
Criteria Description
Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Education
5. Excellent
98 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is clearly presented. Includes a thoughtful, thorough discussion of all required elements. Discussion demonstrates a deep and thorough understanding and insight of human motivation for learning.
4. Good
89.18 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is clearly presented. Includes a thorough discussion of all required elements. Discussion demonstrates an understanding of human motivation for learning.
3. Satisfactory
80.36 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is present but cursory and lacks depth.
2. Less than Satisfactory
71.54 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is present but incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in education is either not present or not evident to the reader.
collapse Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Behavior Therapy assessment
Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Behavior Therapy
98 points
Criteria Description
Discussion of the Modern-Day Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Behavior Therapy
5. Excellent
98 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is clearly presented. All required elements are evident and given support from current, scholarly research. Discussion demonstrates a deep and thorough understanding of course material.
4. Good
89.18 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is clearly presented. All required elements are evident and given support from research. Discussion demonstrates an understanding of course material.
3. Satisfactory
80.36 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is present but cursory and lacks depth.
2. Less than Satisfactory
71.54 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is present but incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the modern-day applications of reinforcement learning in behavior therapy is either not present or not evident to the reader.
collapse Synthesis and Argument assessment
Synthesis and Argument
28 points
Criteria Description
Synthesis and Argument
5. Excellent
28 points
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
25.48 points
Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
22.96 points
Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less than Satisfactory
20.44 points
Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.
collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment
Thesis Development and Purpose
28 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
28 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis.
4. Good
25.48 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
22.96 points
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less than Satisfactory
20.44 points
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
14 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing
5. Excellent
14 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
12.74 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
11.48 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less than Satisfactory
10.22 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
collapse APA Format assessment
APA Format
14 points
Criteria Description
APA Format
5. Excellent
14 points
The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
4. Good
12.74 points
Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
3. Satisfactory
11.48 points
Required correctly format is used, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
10.22 points
Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.
