please see attached, 10 point strategic plan for quality improvement - this assignment also requires an annotation bibliography of 5 articles included in the assignment
Background info regarding this project
The 10 Strategic Points for the Prospectus and Direct Practice Improvement Project
Introduction
In the Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project, there are 10 key or strategic points that need to be clear, simple, correct, and aligned to ensure the project is doable, valuable, and credible. These points, which provide a guide or vision for the project. The 10 Strategic Points are defined within this document and a template provided. The ten strategic points are developed in a table format, as noted below.
The Process for Defining the 10 Strategic Points
The order of the 10 Strategic points listed below reflects the order in which the learner completes the work product. The first five strategic points focus primarily on defining the purpose or focus for the project based on a clearly defined need or gap from the project site.
Criteria for Evaluating the 10 Strategic Points: Clear, Simple, Correct, and Aligned
When developing a project, it is important to define the 10 Strategic points, so they are simple, clear, and correct in order to ensure that anyone who reviews them will easily understand the quality improvement project. It is important to align all of the 10 Strategic points to ensure it will be possible to conduct and complete the project.
Developing the 10 Strategic Points document begins in DNP-815A begins as a three-page document that can help ensure clarity, simplicity, correctness, and alignment of each of these 10 Strategic Points in the Direct Practice Improvement Project. This document is integral to learner success in the project courses. Therefore constant updates should be made through each course as you develop the project. Please see the table below regarding the development of the citation requirements expected per course.
10 Strategic Points Document for a Quality Improvement Project
Ten Strategic Points
The 10 Strategic Points | |
Title of Project |
Implementing a nurse-driven mobility protocol in a long-term acute care facility (do not change) |
Background Theoretical Foundation Literature Synthesis Practice Change Recommendation |
List the primary points for six sections.
|
Problem Statement |
Describe the variables/groups to project, in one sentence. Pls provide one well written paragraph to lead into the purpose statement A well-written problem statement begins with the big picture of the issue (macro) and works to the small, narrower, and more specific problem (micro). It clearly communicates the significance, magnitude, and importance of the problem and transitions into the Purpose of the Project with a declarative statement such as: “It is not known if and to what degree/extent...” or “It is not known how/why and….” ( this is the purpose statement) It is not known if the implementation of a nurse-driven mobility protocol would impact mobility status among adult patients in a long-term acute care facility. (don’t change this statement)
|
PICOT to Evidence-Based Question |
(P) Among adult patients in a rural long-term care facility (I) how does the translation of Black et al’s research on nurse-driven early mobility protocol implementing the Johns Hopkins’ Activity and Mobility Promotion Program (C) compare to current practice (O) impact mobility status (T) over a period of eight weeks? Must keep this statement – do not change Evidence-Based Question: Provide the templated statement To what degree does the translation of Black et al. research on nurse-driven early mobility protocol implementing the Johns Hopkins’ Activity and Mobility Promotion Program impact mobility status when compared to current practice among adult patients in an urban long-term acute care hospital in Virginia over eight weeks? Must keep this statement -do not change |
Sample Setting Location Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria |
Identify sample, needed sample size, and location (project phenomena with small numbers and variables/groups with large numbers).
|
Define Variables |
Dependent Variable (Measurable patient outcome): JH-HLM scale |
Project Design |
This project will use a quality improvement approach. You must be able to explain and cite the difference between research and quality improvement (one paragraph each).
(please fill in) |
Purpose Statement |
Provide the templated statement. The purpose of this quality improvement project is to determine if the implementation of the Johns Hopkins’ Activity and Promotion toolkit of implementing a nurse-driven early mobility protocol would impact mobility status among adult patients admitted to a long-term acute care hospital. The project is to be piloted over an eight-week period in an urban Virginia long-term acute care hospital. Do not change |
Data Collection Approach |
Protocol: 1. Staff education assessment of mobility function (survey) – poster presentation – post education assessment 2. Physical therapist – to perform initial eval (done within 48 hrs of admission) to identify mobility/functional status using the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale (number is identified) 1- 8 1= lowest, 8-highest walk up to 250 ft. 3. All patients are assigned a color coded arm band that determines mobility / activity level. 3. staff’s documents score number in activity section of the EHR – this is done per shift (shifts7a-7p, 7p-7a)- 4. nurse to carry out assist patient according to their score twice daily – activity is documented each shift in the EHR- nursing staff should aim to progress the patient to next level of the score card- once the activity level changes- nurses can change the armband to new designated activity level 5. physical therapy continues to eval pts per their schedule per CMS guidelines to justify therapy services are being rendered. That may need to be cleaned up a little (hope you get the jest of it)
|
Data Analysis Approach |
How will you analyze the participants’ descriptive, demographic information? What statistical analysis will be used to prepare the results? What type of data analysis will be needed to analyze the measurable patient outcomes? What statistical test will be used? (i.e. chi-square, paired t-test, Wilcoxon…) in this section determine a test that’s easy to use for this type of project) Will you use Intellectus, Laerd Statistics, or a statistician? ( pls help / and explain) Discuss the potential Bias and Mitigation of the data. (pls explain) |
References | Include references here used in the strategic plan |
Articles to use: for annotation – total of 5
Bergbower E.A.S., Herbst, C., Chen, N., Aversano, A., Pasqualini, K., Hartline, C., Hamby-Finkelstein, D., Brewer, C., Benko, S., & Fuscaldo, J. (2020). A novel early mobility bundle improves length of stay and rates of readmission among hospitalized general medicine patients. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 10(5), 419–425. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1801373
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=33235675&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
Black, K., Smith, S., Frotan, M., Vandertulip, K., & Miller, A. (2021). Safety of a nurse-driven mobility protocol in a surgical trauma intensive care unit. Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy, 12(2), 51. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000146
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.671485733&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
Klein, L. M., Young, D., Feng, D., Lavezza, A., Hiser, S., Daley, K. N., & Hoyer, E. H. (2018). Increasing patient mobility through an individualized goal-centered hospital mobility program: A quasi-experimental quality improvement project. Nursing Outlook, 66(3), 254–262. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2018.02.006
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S002965541730492X&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
Falkenstein, B. A., Skalkowski, C. K., Lodise, K. D., Moore, M., Olkowski, B. F., & Rojavin, Y. (2020). The Economic and Clinical Impact of an Early Mobility Program in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 27(1), 29–36. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000479
Dima, D., Valiquette, J., Berube-Dufour, J., & Goldfarb, M. (2020). Level of function mobility scale for nurse-driven early mobilisation in people with acute cardiovascular disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(5–6), 778–784. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/jocn.15124
© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.