Leadership and management case study. Please see attached files

Case Study Assignment & Instructions

Please analyze the case Leader as a Coach B.

You need to follow the rubric given in the Turnitin assignment above and use the resource materials given with case A as well as the following questions in your analysis.

What did Kiera do right when evaluating her team? Where did she need improvement?

What are some possible reasons Kiera’s team might not have performed to her expectations? What obstacles has she created?

Now that the second quarter is over, Kiera has an opportunity to make some changes and give some feedback to her team. How should she do that?

4. What should Kiera do after the feedback meetings with her team members?

What are some motivational methods, besides financial incentives, that Kiera should consider?

Resources:

Davidson, Martin N. “Feedback.” Technical Note OB-0746. (Darden Business Publishing, 2001).

Gabarro, John J., and John P. Kotter. “Managing Your Boss.” Harvard Business Review (January

2005).

Hill, Linda A. “Becoming the Boss.” Harvard Business Review (January 2007).

Maccoby, Michael. “Te 4 R’s of Motivation.” Research Technology Management 53, no. 4 (July– August 2010): 60–61.

Time. Winchester, VA: Oakhill Press, 2004.

Scott, Susan. Fierce Conversations, New York: Berkley, 2004.

Stone, Douglas, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen. Difcult Conversations. New York: Penguin Books,

2000.

Turk, Wayne. “The Art of Managing Up.” Defense AT&L 36, no. 2 (March–April 2007).

Wiseman, Liz, and Greg McKeown. “Bringing Out the Best in Your People.” Harvard Business

Review (May 2010).

Required:

Introduction, problem identification, Critical analysis, Proposed action and Conclusion

All answers must include APA 7th in-text citation and APA 7th edition references.

Minimum of ten (6) scholarly references.

Rubric:

Rubric for Individual Case Studies	Poor Quality	Fair Quality	Good Quality	High Quality	Exemplary Quality	SCORE
0 pts	5 pts	10 pts	15 pts	20 pts
Problem Identification 20%	Does not recognize the main problem or mentions problems that are not based on the facts of the case	Mentions problems that lack significance	Recognizes one valid problems	Recognizes multiple problems in the case.	Recognizes one or more key problems in the case. Indicates some issues are more important than others and explains why	______OUT OF 20
key character anslysis 20%	Does not recognize the perspectives of any characters in the case	Considers the perspectives of characters who lack significance	Considers the perspective of one key character in the case	Clearly describes the unique perspective of multiple key characters in the case.	Clearly describes the unique perspective of multiple key characters in the case. Explains how the perspectives are intertwined and related.	______OUT OF 20
Analysis of at least three Approaches 20%	Does not have a clear understanding of the facts in the case	Accurately lists facts in the case but does not understand the relevance of these facts	Considers facts in the case and understands relevance of these facts	Discusses facts in the case and cites related knowledge from research	Discusses facts in the case and cites related knowledge from research and adds knowledge from personal experience	______OUT OF 20
Proposed Action 20%	No action proposed	Action proposed is not feasible	Action proposed is reasonable	More than one reasonable action is proposed	Proposed action best deals with key issue(s)	______OUT OF 20
Length and Quality of submission 20%	Submission lacks originality and does not utilize Turn it in for the assignment with original work.	Submission is beginning to develop a quality paper, but less than 5 pages.	Submission utilizes Turn-it in for original work and has 5 complete pages with minimum errors in the paper.	Submission is original and utilizes an organized manner with detailed analysis.	Submission is original and utilizes Turn it in for 5 complete pages for the assignment. Highly organized through out the paper.	_____ OUT OF 20

						Total________out of 100