Now that you have considered the evidence and potential options to address the local site problem and project objectives, it is now time to describe the proposed design of your project, specific detai
Implementing an Asthma Education Program for Elementary School Staff
Student
Department of Nursing, University of Central Florida
NGR 7911C: Doctoral Project I
Dr. Valerie Martinez
Abstract
Introduction 5
Background and Significance 5
Organizational Needs Assessment 7
Description of the Sponsoring Organization 7
Stakeholder Analysis 9
Project Management Tools 9
Local Problem Statement 11
Literature Review and Synthesis 11
Purpose and Project Goals 14
Conceptual/Theoretical Framework 15
Methods 17
Project Design 17
Setting 17
Population 17
Intervention 17
Budget and Resources 17
Cost-Benefit Analysis 17
Outcome Measures 17
Data Collection 17
Data Analysis Plan 17
Ethical Considerations 17
Timeline for project completion 17
References 17
Appendices 20
Appendix C: Individual Evidence Summary Tool 20
Appendix B: Project Management Tools - Stakeholder Analysis and Communication Tool 23
Appendix B: Project Management Tools – Driver Diagram 24
Appendix B- SWOT Analysis 25
Data Collection Sheet/Instrument 27
Education Plan 27
Coded Data Management Sheet 27
Timeline Figure 27
Organization Letter of Support 27
Asthma is a leading illness among children and adolescents in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2022). Asthma is a chronic disease characterized by inflammation and swelling of the airways (Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America [AAFA], 2022). Inflammation can be triggered by several factors such as smoke, allergens, cold air, viruses, dust, and a variety of chemicals. Asthma symptoms include shortness of breath, difficulty talking, coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness. There is no cure for asthma but with proper management asthma symptoms could be controlled and quality of life improved (AAFA, 2022).
Asthma affects approximately 10% of the pediatric population and is often debilitating (AAFA, 2022). As a result, more than half of missed school days are due to asthma in the United States (Ruvacalba et al., 2019). In the year 2013 alone, it accounted for more than 13.8 million missed school days (AAFA, 2022). School absenteeism affects most asthmatic school-aged children (59%) and is associated with lower academic performance (Hsu et al., 2016). It has a disproportionately higher prevalence in low-income populations, minority backgrounds, and African Americans, with a prevalence of 15.8% among these populations, while other racial and ethnic backgrounds report a prevalence rate of 7.8% (Rubacalva et al., 2019).
A huge burden is placed on both the family and the economic system due to asthma- related management and complications (Carpenter et al., 2016). Each year approximately 50% of children experienced at least one asthma attack (Getch et al., 2019). The average emergency room visit rate among the pediatric population was 88.1 per 10,000 population from the years 2010 to 2018 (CDC, 2021). The total economic impact of asthma among school-aged children is approximately $791 per child each calendar year and includes medical costs, loss of work productivity among parents, school absenteeism, and premature death (Carpenter et al., 2014).
Although children spend approximately half of their day in school and asthma is prevalent, relevant knowledge and resources among school personnel are limited (Lucas et al., 2012). Evidence points to limited education in asthma symptom recognition and management among unlicensed school staff (Anderson et al., 2005; Kawafha & Talbeth 2015; Reznik et al., 2020). A study done among schoolteachers in Illinois revealed that only 25% of teachers received any asthma training at their workplace (Lucas et al., 2012). Thus, recognition of asthma triggers and symptoms of an asthma attack are subpar (Al Aloola et al., 2017; Anderson et al., 2005). Furthermore, a lack of confidence in managing asthma exacerbations and increased anxiety in medication administration are common themes among school personnel (Al Aloola et al., 2017; Anderson et al., 2005; Reznik & Halterman, 2016). There is substantial evidence to argue that increased asthma knowledge can lead to increased confidence and reduced anxiety among school staff, which is needed to calmly respond in emergencies and to be more proactive in asthma management (Reznik et al., 2020).
“Asthma-Friendly Schools” is a CDC initiative that focuses on producing a safe environment conducive to learning for students with asthma and has been shown to improve asthma management (CDC, 2022). This is accomplished through providing asthma awareness programs for students and school staff, supporting evaluation of the programs and utilization of appropriate outcome measures, and providing school health services for students with asthma. In addition, using a collaborative approach in identifying students most in need of intervention contributes to ensuring a safe environment for students with asthma (CDC, 2022).
The goal of this project is to create a safe environment for all asthmatic students through the implementation of an asthma education program for school personnel and the establishment of a referral program for the identification of possible asthmatic students. Through increased knowledge, staff will be more confident and comfortable in asthma identification and management and be proactive facilitators in identifying possible undiagnosed students.
Organizational Needs Assessment Description of the Sponsoring OrganizationImagine Schools at Town Center is a non-profit, public charter school founded in 2004 in Palm Coast, Florida. Its mission is to equip students for lives of leadership, success, and excellent character by offering high-quality education. The vision of the school is for every child to reach their full potential and find the path to lifelong success (Imagine Schools, 2022). For the past ten years, Imagine Schools at Town Center has employed a full-time certified nursing assistant (CNA) to run the nursing clinic. The purpose of the clinic is to improve the health of all people on campus and provide feedback to parents (S. Swanson, personal communication, September 16, 2022).
The school employs approximately 50 teachers and has 900 students from K-8th grade (S. Swanson, personal communication, September 16, 2022). There are currently only 14 students (2% of the student population) with diagnosed asthma which is considerably below the national average of 10% (AAFA, 2021) and indicates there are likely many undiagnosed students with asthma at this school. At the beginning of each school year, parents are required to indicate medical comorbidities and medication usage on admission forms. The CNA will then follow-up with each parent of an asthmatic student to develop an Asthma Action Plan and an Emergency Health Care Plan that are updated yearly. The completed Asthma Action Plans are kept in the clinic and with each teacher that has a student with asthma (S. Swanson, personal communication, September 16, 2022). However, for the past ten years, there have been no training for most of the school staff to address asthma identification and management, review current school policies, or use of Asthma Action Plans. Furthermore, there is no referral program set up for school staff to report asthma symptoms and collaborate with the school CNA to identify possible asthmatic students that have been missed (S. Swanson, personal communication, September 16, 2022).
Stakeholder AnalysisThe proposed project will incorporate different key stakeholders including the school principal, CNA, schoolteachers and staff, and parents, as identified in Appendix A. Each stakeholder carries a specific role in the implementation and can either contribute or impede the project through their influence. To engage key stakeholders, the benefits of asthma education and a referral program must be clearly presented and collaboration between each entity established. The school principal is responsible for approving the project. The CNA is responsible for collaborating with the project coordinator, school staff, and parents of each student referred to the asthma program. Staff’s responsibilities include attending an educational session and identifying and referring possible asthmatic students. Ease and usefulness of the program, in addition to convenient scheduling of the educational session, are critical factors in ensuring staff engagement. Lastly, parents are responsible for following up with their child’s provider for asthma screening and possible diagnosis. To ensure their participation, the referral process and the importance of following up with their child’s provider for asthma screening must be clearly explained to each parent.
Project Management ToolsSeveral project management tools were utilized to gain a clear picture of the project aim and to make project plans strategically. The driver diagram, as detailed in Appendix B, illustrates change ideas that will be implemented through this project, primary and secondary drivers, and the project aim. The project aim is to increase the staff’s confidence in identifying and managing pediatric asthma by at least 30% and have at least three students referred to the school clinic for further follow-up. The primary drivers include increasing staff confidence in asthma management and identifying possible asthmatic students. Secondary drivers include the staff’s lack of knowledge and confidence in identifying asthma triggers, asthma symptoms, and correct treatment. Other secondary drivers include the staff’s uncertainty about their school policy and the lack of a referral program. Change factors to facilitate project success include asthma identification and management training for the school staff, arranged collaboration between the school staff and the CNA, and establishment of a referral program.
The strength, weakness, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis is also detailed in
Appendix B. Strengths of the proposed project include the following: 1) Support from the school administration and CNA, 2) Cost-effectiveness of the program, 3) Assurance of staff participation, and 4) Obvious need for the educational session. Weaknesses address the fact that the referral program will be based on the willingness of the school staff and CNA and the training will require their already limited time. Opportunities focus on improving students’ safety and health through asthma education and identification of undiagnosed asthma students through the referral program. However, an obvious threat exists to successful implementation as most of the school staff is not used to health education sessions and might not be open to an in-service.
Imagine School at Town Center for the past ten years has not offered an asthma educational session for most of its school staff. Thus, the school staff might lack the necessary knowledge and confidence to successfully prevent, identify, and manage asthma emergencies. Because the school’s asthma prevalence is much lower than the national and state average and there is no established referral program to identify possible asthmatic students, the health of many asthma students might be jeopardized as they remain undiagnosed and unmanaged.
Literature Review and SynthesisSearch Strategy
To address the need for school staff asthma education, a literature search was conducted to answer the following PICO question: “In school personnel, how does an asthma education program compared to no education program affect identification of possible asthmatic students and staff’s confidence in pediatric asthma identification and management?” The literature search was conducted through the EBSCOhost research platform using Medline, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and APA PsycInfo databases. Search terms used included [“asthma educat*” OR “asthma program” OR “asthma intervention” OR “asthma referral*”] AND [“school personnel” OR teacher OR “school staff”]. An initial search yielded 146 articles from which 37 were excluded due to duplication. All peer-reviewed articles in the English language were then reviewed and included if they mentioned an asthma intervention or education program geared towards school staff. Hence, all asthma programs or educational sessions geared towards students, parents, or only school nurses were excluded. A total of eight articles were included in this synthesis as documented by Appendix C.
Synthesized Key Findings
The Need for an Educational Program
An emerging theme throughout the literature is the need for asthma identification and management education geared toward school personnel (Anderson et al., 2005; Carpenter et al., 2014; Reznik & Halterman, 2016). Most school personnel reported no asthma education classes or sessions offered in their school and thus decreased knowledge in identifying and managing asthma (Anderson et al., 2005; Kawafha & Tawalbeth, 2015; Reznik & Halterman, 2016; Ruvalcaba et al., 2019). Common misconceptions surrounded around recognition of asthma attack symptoms, steps to take during an emergency, current school policies, and medication use (Anderson et al., 2005; Reznik & Halterman, 2016; Neuharth-Pritchett & Getch, 2016). School personnel also demonstrated low confidence scores in identifying and managing asthma attacks (Al Aloola et al., 2017; Neuhartg-Pritchett & Getch, 2016; Reznik et al., 2020; Reznik & Halterman, 2016). Sixty-six percent of teachers felt uncomfortable helping students to manage an asthma attack and 44% worried about a potential asthma attack during their school day (Reznik & Halterman, 2016). High anxiety levels were present among many elementary school teachers as they worried about asthma attacks and medication administration (Reznik & Halterman, 2016).
Benefits and Content of the Educational Program
A standardized asthma education program has been shown to improve school personnel’s knowledge and confidence in asthma identification and management (Kawafha & Tawalbeth, 2015; Neuharth-Pritchett & Getch, 2016; Reznik et al., 2016; Ruvalcaba et al., 2019). Significant recognition of asthma symptoms and comfort assessing for an asthma attack were seen post- asthma-education interventions (Al Aloola et al., 2017; Kawafha & Tawalbeth, 2015; Reznik et al., 2020). Symptom recognition and identification, emergency management, and medication use were all vital components of an effective educational session (Al Aloola et al., 2017; Anderson et al., 2005; Reznik et al., 2020; Reznik & Halterman, 2016; Ruvalcaba et la., 2019). A successful educational session that was conducive to learning was interactive and often included visual aids, PowerPoint presentation, inhaler demonstration, case studies, question/answer session, and/or supplemental printed materials (Al Aloola et al., 2017; Neuharth-Pritchett & Getch, 2016; Reznik et al., 2020; Ruvalcaba et al., 2019). Another vital component of an asthma educational program that has been shown to improve staff’s knowledge and students’ asthma symptoms is reviewing current school policies regarding asthma emergencies and the role of the teacher (Carpenter et al., 2014 Reznik et al., 2020; Ruvalcaba et al., 2019).
Sustainability of the Educational Program and Practice changes
Lastly, a sustainable education program includes asthma practice or policy changes that are written, reviewed with the school personnel, and in collaboration with the school staff (Carpenter et al., 2014; Reznik & Halterman, 2016; Ruvalcaba et al., 2019). Any changes or additions to the current practice are based on the school’s individual need and discussed with the school staff (Carpenter et al., 2014). Evidence shows that practice changes focused on the assessment of students with asthma symptoms, in addition to educating the school staff, have been shown to improve asthma management (Carpenter et al., 2014). However, the practices of teachers are not always consistent with practice guidelines due to insufficient knowledge of existing policies and their processes, lack of written policies, and absence of collaboration between school personnel (Anderson et al., 2005 & Carpenter et al., 2014). Thus, successful implementation of a practice change should be clearly explained, easily accessible, and in collaboration with the school nurse (Carpenter et al., 2014).
Purpose and Project GoalsThe purpose of this project is to improve the confidence of the school staff in pediatric asthma identification and management. This will be accomplished through an educational session focused on asthma prevention, identification, and management within the school setting. The second aim of the project is to improve the safety and well-being of students by establishing a referral program for identifying possible undiagnosed asthmatic students.
Conceptual/Theoretical FrameworkBandura’s Theory of Self-Efficacy is the theoretical framework guiding this project. The concept of self-efficacy is defined as an individual’s belief in their capabilities which determines how one will carry out actions to produce a certain desired outcome. The term self-efficacy and its impact on confidence, motivation, and empowerment was first described by Albert Bandura in 1986 (Bourne, 2021). Self-efficacy influences one’s efforts and subsequently their results (Bourne, 2021). People with higher self-efficacy aim for more ambitious goals, initiate action, and are more persistent in their efforts, even if actual capabilities do not match their beliefs at that time (Warner et al., 2020).
Current literature describes the need for self-efficacy in carrying out any role successfully (Bourne, 2021; Khan et al., 2021). Teacher self-efficacy is associated with motivation, initiative, and resilience, and thus, knowledge application, skill acquisition, and positive engagement of students (Bourne, 2021; Romjin, 2020). Khan et al., (2021) defines caregiver self-efficacy as being confident in their ability to support and take care of a loved one while maintaining emotional well-being and seeking support. Patient self-efficacy has been associated with better asthma disease control and outcomes (Reznik et al., 2020).
One of the goals of this project is to increase the staff’s confidence in preventing, identifying, and managing asthma attacks. Higher self-efficacy is associated with reduced anxiety and improved comfort, thus school staff will be more proactive in creating a safe environment for asthmatic students and managing emergencies (Reznik et al., 2020). Furthermore, they will feel more competent and empowered to make a difference in the lives of their students. As a result, the safety and health of asthmatic students will be improved within the school setting.
Al Aloola, N. A., Saba, M., Nissen, L., Alewairdhi, H. A., Alaloola, A., & Saini, B. (2017). Development and evaluation of a school-based asthma educational program. The Journal of Asthma: Official Journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 54(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2016.1218015
Anderson E.W., Valerio M, Liu M, Benet DJ, Joseph C, Brown R, & Clark NM. (2005). Schools’ capacity to help low-income, minority children to manage asthma. Journal of School Nursing, 21(4), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405050210040901
Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA). (2022). Asthma Facts and Figures. https://www.aafa.org/asthma-facts/
Bourne. (2021). Clinical teacher self-efficacy: A concept analysis. Nurse Education in Practice., 52, 103029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103029
Carpenter, L. M., Lachance, L., Wilkin, M., & Clark, N. M. (2013). Sustaining school-based asthma interventions through policy and practice change. Journal of School Health, 83(12), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12104
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021, April 9). Asthma emergency department (ED) visits 2010–2018. https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/asthma_stats/asthma-ed-visits_2010-2018.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022, August 18). Asthma. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/asthma/index.htm
Imagine Schools. (2022). Vision & Mission. http://imagineschooltowncenter.org/home/
Getch, Y. Q., Neuharth-Pritchett, S., & Schilling, E. J. (2019). Asthma and the public-school teacher: A two state study. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology, 32(3), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2019.1041
Hsu, J., Qin, X., Beavers, S. F., & Mirabelli, M. C. (2016). Asthma-related school absenteeism, morbidity, and modifiable factors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.012
Kawafha, M. M., & Tawalbeh, L. I. (2015). The effect of asthma education program on knowledge of schoolteachers: A randomized controlled trial. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37(4), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945914528070
Khan, T. S., Hirschman, K. B., McHugh, M. D., & Naylor, M. D. (2021). Self‐efficacy of family caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum., 56(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12499
Neuharth-Pritchett, S., & Getch, Y. Q. (2016). The effectiveness of a brief asthma education intervention for childcare providers and primary school teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(6), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0751-0
Reznik, M., Greenberg, E., Cain, A., Halterman, J. S., & Ivanna Avalos, M. (2020). Improving teacher comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management. Journal of Asthma, 57(11), 1237–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2019.1640732
Reznik, M., & Halterman, J. S. (2016). School asthma policies and teachers' confidence and attitudes about their role in asthma management. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 116(5), 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2016.03.005
Romijn. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy and intercultural classroom practices in diverse classroom contexts: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 79, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.08.001
Ruvalcaba, E., Chung, S. E., Rand, C., Riekert, K. A., & Eakin, M. (2019). Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent asthma education program for Head Start staff. The Journal of Asthma: Official Journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 56(2), 218–226.
Warner, Stadler, G., Lüscher, J., Knoll, N., Ochsner, S., Hornung, R., & Scholz, U. (2018). Day‐to‐day mastery and self‐efficacy changes during a smoking quit attempt: Two studies. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(2), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12293
Appendices | |||||||||||
Appendix C: Individual Evidence Summary Tool | |||||||||||
EBP Question: In school personnel, how does an asthma interventional program compared to no interventional program affect identification of possible asthmatic students and staff’s confidence in pediatric asthma identification and management? | |||||||||||
Author and Date | Title of Article | Journal | Population, Size (n) | Setting | Type of Evidence | Description of Intervention | Outcome measures | Findings that help answer the EBP question | Limitations | Evidence level and quality | Implications for Proposed Project |
Al Aloola et al., 2017 | Development and evaluation of a school-based asthma educational program | Journal of Asthma | 47 teachers | Girls’ primary schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | Quasi-Experimental Study | A 3hr school-based asthma educational program | Asthma awareness, attitudes, and competence in in providing asthma-related first aid interventions | 84% of teachers reported increased confidence in providing care to children with asthma after the program Competence scores increased by 7x post education | It’s a pilot program so results should be interpreted cautiously regarding generalizability. Even though instruments to measure asthma awareness and attitude have been found to be reliable, they have not been formally validated. | Level II High Quality-B | Schedule session at a time convenient for school staff Can use a Likert Scale to evaluate pre and post confidence scores Implement an interactive session to include case studies, discussions, and demonstrations (see content and format of education session) |
Anderson et al., 2005 | Schools’ capacity to help low-income, minority children to manage asthma | Journal of School Nursing | 14 schools | Detroit public schools | Descriptive Study | School staff’s /parents’ surveys | Emerging concerns and current knowledge | 35% of teachers listed incorrect asthma attack symptoms such as dizziness, fever, eyes rolled back, etc. Only 36% recognized trouble breathing as a sign of asthma attack and 9% a cough Practices of teachers not consistent with asthma guidelines | Survey of a specific population group of teachers in Detroit Most schools had no nurse on site so results may be different slightly | Level III Good Quality-B | Results show the need for asthma education especially in symptom recognition and identification and what to do next… Teach proper medication use and school policy as 15% of parents that reported school asthma problems -of those 37% stated school personnel was reluctant to give medication when needed… |
Carpenter et al., 2014 | Sustaining school-based asthma interventions through policy and practice change | Journal of School Health | 14 Missouri Programs | Missouri community settings to include schools | Mixed method | Policy and practice changes brought about through the Childhood Asthma Linkages in Missouri (CALM) program | Childhood asthma symptoms Policy changes regarding assessment and monitoring Practice changes to include regular asthma education programs for school personnel | Improvement in childhood asthma symptoms have been shown through practice changes focused on assessment of asthmatic students and educational sessions for school personnel | No long-term evaluation of the CALM program | Level III Good Quality-B | Reviewing Asthma Action Plans is beneficial Policy changes tailored for individual schools’ need, such as the referral program, can be beneficial in improving overall asthma management |
Kawafha & Tawalbeh 2015 | The effect of asthma education program on knowledge of schoolteachers: A randomized controlled trial | Western Journal of Nursing Research | Experimental group (n=36) Control group (n=38) | Teachers at all public primary schools in Jordan, north region. | RCT | 3 asthma education sessions, each lasting 1 hr | Teacher’s knowledge in pediatric asthma using the Asthma General Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults (AGKQA). | Experimental group had significantly higher rates of asthma knowledge compared to the control group and at the retention phase (1 week and 3 months post-implementation) | Sample only included female teachers and was geographically and culturally different than USA | Level I High Quality- A | At end of program, provide pamphlets summarizing key components Powerpoint presentation may be helpful Improved knowledge correlates to improved confidence in asthma recognition of symptoms and management of emergencies |
Neuharth-Pritchett & Getch, 2016 | The effectiveness of a brief asthma education intervention for childcare providers and primary school teachers | Early Childhood Educational Journal | 65 participants total. 25 child care providers and 40 primary school teachers | State of Georgia | Quasi-Experimental Study | Two 3-hr workshops of education on asthma identification and management | Teacher’s knowledge and comfort in assisting during asthma attacks | Significant increase in recognition and symptom management by 2x. Significant increase in comfort levels of staff helping students with asthma and medication administration. | Convenience sampling Brief intervention-participants not followed to examine results more longitudinally | Level II Good quality B | Include in the educational session identification and minimization of asthma triggers in the classroom, medication administration, and physical activity factors. Include case studies. |
Reznik et al., 2020 | Improving teacher comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management | Journal of Asthma | 65 teachers | Four Bronx elementary schools | Quasi-Experimental Study | 45-minute workshop for teachers | Perceived teacher comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management | Mores teachers felt comfortable assessing and handling the situation during a child’s asthma attack Self-efficacy scores measuring confidence increased post-intervention | Population very specific (Bronx) and has one of the highest asthma prevalence in the country | Level II High Quality-A | Sample inhaler and spacer to be used to demonstrate proper medication technique. Supplemental printed materials may be beneficial Implement “National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines on asthma management in schools” during the session Include possible PowerPoint and interactive question/answer session and current asthma policies (and the need for improved identification and referral system) |
Reznik & Halterman, 2016 | School asthma policies and teachers' confidence and attitudes about their role in asthma management | Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology | 65 teachers | 4 Bronx schools | Cross-sectional Study | Survey of teachers | Awareness of written asthma policy and its influence on teacher confidence | 69% of teachers felt uncomfortable assessing and 66% felt uncomfortable managing an asthma attack 43% of teachers were anxious when a student was having an asthma attack Teachers in schools with written asthma policy in place felt more confident during a student’s asthma attack (89.5% vs. 53.5%), assisting with asthma medication (68.4% vs. 29.5%), and confident in reducing triggers (52.6% vs. 20.5%). | Cross-sectional study Only surveyed a specific group of teachers (2nd to 5th grade in Bronx schools) | Level III Good Quality | For teachers to feel more confident in referring students to the nurse for possible asthma symptoms and further evaluation, a written policy must be in place. Proposed written policy (referral program) must also be reviewed with the teachers. Study shows the need for intervention geared to reducing anxiety and improving confidence in asthma assessment and management |
Ruvalcaba et al., 2019 | Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent asthma education program for Head Start staff | Journal of Asthma | 13 Head Start programs and included 16 asthma-specific staff training sessions with a total of 159 staff members for the full duration the program | Baltimore City Head Start Programs | Quasi-Experimental Study | 5-year multicomponent staff asthma education session (2 hrs.) that is offered annually Also included health fairs, parent workshops, health advisory committee education opportunities | Asthma knowledge and skills Asthma medication management | Year 5 HS staff reported higher self-assessed asthma knowledge and skills compared to pre-intervention by 13% | No controls No matching of surveys so hard to evaluate individual improvement rates | Level II Good quality -B | Education sessions were interactive and included images, videos, demonstration of inhaler, and review of Asthma Action Plans At least 1/3 of training time was focused on symptom recognition |
Appendix B: Project Management Tools - Stakeholder Analysis and Communication Tool | ||||||||
Identify the key stakeholders: School principal, CNA, schoolteachers and staff, and parents of students | ||||||||
☒ Manager or direct supervisor (principal) ☐ Finance department ☐ Vendors ☒ Parents of students ☐ Professional organizations ☒ Committees | ☐ Organizational leaders ☒ Interdisciplinary colleagues (School CNA) ☐ Administrators ☐ Other units or departments ☒ Others: School teachers/staff | |||||||
Stakeholder analysis matrix: | ||||||||
Stakeholder Name and Title: | Role: (select all that apply) | Impact Level: How much does the project impact them? | Influence Level: How much influence do they have over the project? | What matters most to the stakeholder? | How could the stakeholder contribute to the project? | How could the stakeholder impede the project? | Strategy(s) for engaging the stakeholder: | |
School principal | Approval | Minor | Significant | No interruptions in workflow Outcomes | Approve the project | Refuse the project | Provide evidence of asthma interventional project | |
School CNA | Approval Responsibility Consult | Significant | Significant | Ease and usefulness of program
| Approve the project Collaborate with project coordinator and school staff | Refuse to implement the project Fail to follow-up within the referral process | Provide evidence of asthma interventional project Collaboration Be open to suggestions | |
School staff | Responsibility | Significant | Significant | Ease and usefulness of program Convenient scheduling | Identify asthmatic students and refer | Not participate in implementation Fail to refer possible asthmatic students | Provide evidence of asthma interventional project Schedule session at convenient time within allotted timeframe | |
Parents | Inform | Moderate | Minor | Succinct and clear presentation of a child’s possible diagnosis and next steps Convenient time of phone calls | Follow-up with a provider for asthma screening | Failure to be reached through telephone use Failure to follow-up with a provider | Explain the referral process, possible signs of asthma attack noticed in their child, and importance of following up with a provider for asthma screening |
Appendix B: Project Management Tools - Stakeholder Analysis and Communication Tool - Communication Planning | |||||
Refer to this section to guide your communications to stakeholders throughout and after completing the EBP project. | |||||
What is the purpose of the dissemination of the EBP project findings? (check all that apply) | |||||
☒ Raise awareness ☒ Promote action ☐ Change policy | ☒ Change practice ☒ Engage stakeholders | ☒ Inform stakeholders | |||
What are the 3 most important messages? | |||||
Asthma educational session improves school staff’s knowledge and confidence in identifying, preventing, and managing asthma attacks. It is highly likely that a significant number of students have undiagnosed asthma based on USA statistics. The referral program will aid in identifying undiagnosed asthmatic students to improve their health and safety. | |||||
Align key message(s) and methods with audience: | |||||
Audience | Key Messages | Method | Timing | ||
School principal | Inform how asthma interventional program aids in student safety | Meeting | 2 months | ||
School CNA | Educate of benefits of asthma interventional program: collaboration of school staff to improve student safety | Meeting | 2 months | ||
School teachers/Staff | Educate on benefits and use of asthma interventional program Encourage use of asthma referral program when appropriate | Meeting | 6 months | ||
Parents | Importance of prompt provider follow-up for child asthma screening | Phone call | 6-7 months |
Aim Primary Drivers Secondary Drivers Change Ideas
Appendix B- SWOT Analysis
Strength | Weaknesses |
|
|
Opportunities | Threats |
|
|
Data Collection Sheet/Instrument Pre and post-test confidence questionnaire Demographics questionnaire Asthma referral form Education Plan Coded Data Management Sheet Timeline Figure Organization Letter of Support