The article must be 8-9 pages long, and I attached the pdf of rubrics and article information with this question and please review the question properly then start with the article. The marks are out

HEAL 4600 Critical Review Rubric “Most of us would rather be ruined by praise than saved by criticism. ” - Norman Vincent Peale. The evaluation of the critical review is based on both substantive and qualitative criteria. Comments : A. SUBSTANTIVE 1. Introduction and Conclusion 1 (Lacks focus) 2 3 4 (Well -focused) 2. Summary of the Article 1 or 2 (Lacks detail, very difficult to understand) , 3 or 4 (Few relevant details, difficult to understand) 5 or 6 (Adequate details , understan dable ), 7 or 8 (Excellent details, very easy to understand) 3. Critique of the Article 1 or 2 (Lacks detail, very difficult to understand) , 3 or 4 (Few relevant details, difficult to understand) 5 or 6 (Adequate details , understan dable ), 7 or 8 (Excellent details, very easy to understand) B. QUALITY 1. Form at (title page, reference list, use of APA 7 th edition formatting, readability, headings) 1 (Serious problems) 1.5 (Some problems) 2 (No problems) 2. Gra mmar and P unctuation (possessives, subject -verb agreement, noun -pronoun agreement, misplaced modifie rs, parallelism, use of commas/semicolons/ periods , quotation marks, parentheses, dashes, spelling 1 (Many errors ) 2 3 4 (No errors ) 3. Style (word usage, awkward sentences, wordy sentences, careless repetition, unity and coherence of paragraphs, unity and coherence of sections, transitions between paragraphs and sections, development of ideas, active -passive verbs, paragraph structu re. 1 (Many errors ) 2 3 4 (No errors ) 4. Poor C omposition (marks will b e deducted for poor composition as warranted) 5. Poor Spelling (marks will b e de ducted for poor spelling as warranted) 6. Article pre -approval (the a rticle was not pre -approved by email by the required deadline (-2) C. GRADE /30