| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction to the case (1 page)Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. | | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in detail the case for the Assignment.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. | 8 to >7.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately summarizes the case for the Assignment.... The response accurately explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient. | 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient. | 6 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient. |
| 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision #1 (1–2 pages)• Which decision did you select?• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. | | 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided. | 17 to >15.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately explains the decision selected.... The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.... The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.... The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.... The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided. | 15 to >13.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided. | 13 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the decision selected.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.... Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing. |
| 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision #2 (1–2 pages)• Which decision did you select?• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. | | 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided. | 17 to >15.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately explains the decision selected.... The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.... The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.... The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.... The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided. | 15 to >13.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided. | 13 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.... Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing. |
| 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision #3 (1–2 pages)• Which decision did you select?• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. | | 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided. | 17 to >15.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately explains the decision selected.... The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected.... The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.... The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response.... The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided. | 15 to >13.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients.... Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided. | 13 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing.... Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing. |
| 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion (1 page)• Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. | | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient.... The response accurately and clearly explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that fully support the recommendations provided. | 13 to >11.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient.... The response accurately explains a justification for the recommendation provided, including clinically relevant resources that support the recommendations provided. | 11 to >10.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the recommendations provided. | 10 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that do not support the recommendations provided, or is missing. |
| 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. | 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time....Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. | 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. | 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
| 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
| 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Uses correct APA format with no errors. | 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. | 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. | 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
| 5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
