It is possible to do this?
Reaction Paper Instructions
Due Date: March 21, 2023 at 5:00 PM – SafeAssign on Blackboard
Late papers will be penalized with a 5-point deduction for each day late.
Your reaction paper will be based on one of the options listed below. The goal is to identify two concepts from any of the first four chapters that you were present or mentioned in the option you chose. You will identify the concepts that you think are present or exemplified in your choice. You will explain the concepts and how the instances you chose to highlight exemplifies them. Lastly you will reflect on the general relevance of those concepts and any criticism or evaluation you might have. The two concepts can be from the same chapter or different chapters. Be sure to be specific and provide examples that illustrate the concepts and your viewpoint.
Your reaction paper should be 2 pages in length (double-spaced (use APA format; check provided guidelines)). You may not write more three pages. You must upload your submission as a PDF document to Blackboard.
Choose of the following for your reaction paper:
Gladwell, M. (Host). (2016, August 17). The Satire Paradox. (Season 1. Episode 10)
(Link: https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/revisionist-history/the-satire-paradox)
Hayes, C. (Host). (2018, December 4). The Information Crisis with David Roberts.
The Information Crisis with David Roberts
(Link: https://podcasts.apple.com/bb/podcast/the-information-crisis-with-david-roberts/id1382983397?i=1000425092340)
RSA. (2010, April 1). The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc)
Rubric Reaction Paper #! – Spring 2023
| Name: => | Grade: => _________________ | ||||
| Title: | Assignment: Reaction Paper #1 | ||||
| Concept 1
| First Concept
| Not Included | Concept not covered in Ch. 1-4 | Concept Covered in Ch. 1-4 | |
| Identified a concept | |||||
| Not Included | Poor | Satisfactory (lacks details but clear) Very Good (detailed & well written) | |||
| Explained Concept | |||||
| Exemplified (linked concept & example) | |||||
| Concept 2
| Second Concept
| Not Included | Concept not covered in Ch. 1-4 | Concept Covered in Ch. 1-4 | |
| Identified a concept | |||||
| Not Included | Poor | Satisfactory (lacks details but clear) Very Good (detailed & well written) | |||
| Explained Concept | |||||
| Exemplified (linked concept & example) | |||||
| Reflection | Not Included | Poor | Satisfactory (lacks details but clear) Very Good (detailed & well written) | ||
| General Reflection/Criticism/Evaluation | |||||
| Grading:
| |||||
| 100 = | 2 "Very Good" for the two concepts & "Very Good" for the reflection | ||||
| 90 = | 2 "Very Good" for the two concepts & "Satisfactory" for the reflection | ||||
| 80 = | All marks (2 concepts & Reflection) are "Satisfactory" | ||||
| 70 = | Most marks are "Satisfactory" W/1 marked "Poor" | ||||
| 70 = | Only 1 Concept ("Very Good"/"Satisfactory") & "Very Good"/"Satisfactory" Reflection | ||||
| 60 = | Some combination of "Satisfactory" & "Poor" | ||||
| 50 = | Mostly "Poor" & "Not Included" | ||||
