I need a paper about public economic development. The instructions are in the attached files.
Criteria Ratings Points Assignment Requirements 20 to >17 pts Advanced In following the instructions for the assignment option chosen, the student carefully executed each component of the option chosen, finding out the status of the jurisdiction and itemizing the determining factors for current conditions. 17 to >15 pts Proficient Followed the instructions for the assignment option chosen. 15 to >0 pts Developing Followed most of the instructions for the assignment option chosen 0 pts Not Present 20 pts Professionalism and Preparedness for Chosen Option 25 to >22 pts Advanced Demonstrates professionalism by either:%Ï O p t i o n # 1 – P u b l i c Administrator Interviews:
Demonstrates preparedness to discuss the question responses/topic, having successfully met all requirements of interviewing 2 public administrators to secure economic development related information.
Granting the interviewer maximum opportunity to explain conditions and to do so with minimum interruption.
%Ï O p t i o n # 2 – D a t a Analytic Assessment of Economic Development Activity for Selected Jurisdiction: The substantive data collection performance exhibits the professional content and quality of information required for the audio embedded PowerPoint presentation, relying on key statistical data sources for economic indicators:
%Ï O p t i o n # 3 – I n t e g r a t e d 22 to >19 pts Proficient Demonstrates professionalism by either:
%Ï O p t i o n # 1 – P u b l i c Administrator Interviews:
Demonstrates preparedness to discuss the question responses/topic, having successfully met all requirements of interviewing 2 public administrators to secure economic development related information.
%Ï O p t i o n # 2 – D a t a Analytic Assessment of Economic Development Activity for Selected Jurisdiction: The substantive data collection performance exhibits the professional content and quality of information required for the audio embedded PowerPoint presentation.
%Ï O p t i o n # 3 – 19 to >0 pts Developing Seems mostly prepared but lacks professionalism by either:
%Ï O p t i o n # 1 – P u b l i c Administrator Interviews:
The student is heard well enough on the recordings to discern his/her preparedness, having presented all recorded interviews as audio files with a time gauge of question responses; but, the bio/summary is unorganized and/or the student conducted only 1 of the 2 interviews required for the completion of this assignment.
%Ï O p t i o n # 2 – D a t a A n a l y t i c Assessment of Economic Development Activity for Selected Jurisdiction: The substantive data collection omits a few significant elements required for presentation in an audio embedded PowerPoint.
%Ï O p t i o n # 3 – I n t e g r a t e d Qualitative (Public Administrator Interview Generated Information) with Select Quantitative (Data Analytic Indicators) of 0 pts Not Present 25 pts Public Administrator Generated Information on Economic Development Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320 Criteria Ratings Points Qualitative (Public Administrator Interview Generated Information) with Select Quantitative (Data Analytic Indicators) of Economic Development Activity: Collected and then successfully presented the required data visually, incorporating audio embedded PowerPoint.
And, in doing so, identified the network of stakeholders and the data upon which they rely to determine the effectiveness of economic development activity. Integrated Qualitative (Public Administrator Interview Generated Information) with Select Quantitative (Data Analytic Indicators) of Economic Development Activity:
Collected and then successfully presented the required data visually, incorporating audio embedded PowerPoint. Economic Development Activity: Partially collected and then presented the data visually, incorporating audio embedded PowerPoint.
Knowledge of Economic Development 25 to >22 pts Advanced Student generates a summary narrative of the information gathered that addresses in detail key variables uniquely associated with economic development for the jurisdiction. 22 to >19 pts Proficient The product indicates that the student demonstrates understanding of the information generated for decision making in community economic development 19 to >0 pts Developing The product indicates a partial understanding of the information generated for decision making in community economic development 0 pts Not Present 25 pts PowerPoint Display 15 to >13 pts Advanced Audio-Visual fully supports the information obtained. 13 to >11 pts Proficient Audio-Visual offers some information or covers a wide array without analysis 11 to >0 pts Developing Audio-Visual lacks some key information or lacks analysis 0 pts Not Present 15 pts References 15 to >13 pts Advanced All key sources of information are listed on the final slide of the PowerPoint. References conform to APA style. 13 to >11 pts Proficient Most key sources of information are listed on the final slide of the PowerPoint.
References conform to APA style 11 to >0 pts Developing Only a few key sources of information are listed on the final slide of the PowerPoint. APA style minimally applied 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Public Administrator Generated Information on Economic Development Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320 Criteria Ratings Points Total Points: 100 Public Administrator Generated Information on Economic Development Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320
