Hello, can somebody help me finish this assignment? I will attach all the required information.

Instructions for assignment:

Assignment Topic: “What type of diet is most beneficial for long-term health”?

Hardy, J., Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). With good reason: A guide to critical thinking. Bridgepoint Education.

• Read the assigned sections of Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 in your textbook:

  • 5.1: Basic Concepts in Inductive Reasoning

  • 5.2: Statistical Arguments: Statistical Syllogisms

  • 5.3: Statistical Arguments: Inductive Generalizations

  • 5.6: Arguments from Authority

  • 5.7: Arguments from Analogy

  • Chapter 5 Summary

  • 6.4: Reasoning About Science: The Hypothetico-Deductive Method

  • 6.5: Inference to the Best Explanation

• Watch the videos:

  • What Is a “STRONG” argument?Links to an external site.

  • What Is an Inductive Argument?Links to an external site.

  • Inductive ReasoningLinks to an external site.

  • Inference to the Best ExplanationLinks to an external site.

 For this assignment, you will present and evaluate reasoning from scholarly sources on both sides of your topic.

Scholarly Sources:

Hjelmesæth, J., & Sjöberg, A. (2022). Human body weight, nutrients, and foods: a scoping review. Food & Nutrition Research, 66(2022), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v66.8814

Stotzer, U. S., Pisani, G. F., Canevazzi, G. H., Shiguemoto, G. E., Perez, S. E., Selistre-de-Araújo, H. S., & Duarte, A. C. (2018). Benefits of resistance training on body composition and glucose clearance are inhibited by long-term low carbohydrate diet in rats. PLoS ONE, 13(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207951

Syed, I. U. (2020). Diet, physical activity, and emotional health: what works, what doesn't, and why we need integrated solutions for total worker health. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8288-6

Non-Scholarly Sources:

Harvard Health Publications. (2020). A heart-healthy diet doesn't need to be low in fat: But the source of the fats you choose--and the rest of what you typically eat--make a big difference. Harvard Heart Letter, 31(3), 1–7. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=a9h&AN=146572871&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897.

Make Better Nutrition a Lifestyle: Motivate yourself to eat more healthfully. (2021). IDEA Fitness Journal, 18(2), 40–40. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=s3h&AN=149553112&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897.

Harvard Health Publications. (2021). Weight-loss diets that keep your heart happy. (Cover story). Harvard Heart Letter, 1–7. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=a9h&AN=151650399&site=ehost-live&custid=s8856897.

an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week Three Example Paper

Write a paper that includes the following:

Introduction (approximately 100 words)

• Explain your topic and state the specific question that you are addressing.

Presentation of an Argument (approximately 200 words)

• Describe the scholarly source on one side of the issue.

• Present what you see as the main argument from that source (present the argument in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion).

Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source (approximately 200 words)
You may address questions such as the following:

• How adequately does the article support the premises of the argument?

• How strongly do the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion?

• What (if any) missing premises would be needed to complete the argument (make it valid/strong)? Are these missing premises justified or merely assumptions?

Presentation of an Opposing Argument (approximately 200 words)

• Describe the scholarly source on the other side of the issue.

• Present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion.

Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source (approximately 200 words)
You may address questions such as the following:

• How adequately does the article support the premises of the argument?

• How strongly do the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion?

• What (if any) missing premises would be needed to complete the argument (make it valid/strong)? Are these missing premises justified or merely assumptions?

Evaluation of Arguments in Non-Scholarly and Scholarly Sources (approximately 100 words)

• Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support for premises in these scholarly sources contrasted with non-scholarly sources.

• Conclusion (approximately 50 words)

The Scholarly Arguments paper

• Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site. resource.

• Must include a separate title page with the following:

  • Title of paper in bold font

    • Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.

  • Student’s name

  • Name of institution (University of Arizona Global Campus)

  • Course name and number

  • Instructor’s name

  • Due date

• Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance.

• Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.