I need a Case Study on Economic Development. The instructions are in the attached files

Criteria Ratings Points Locale 15 to >12 pts Advanced In specifying location, student demonstrates competency in specifying the unique geographical elements with the locale and implications for economic development. 12 pts Developing Student chooses a locale, but the economic need is not readily seen and/or rationale is lacking. 12 to >0 pts Proficient Student chooses a specific locale and clearly outlines the economic status and rationale. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Economic Situation 15 to >13 pts Advanced %Ï S t u d e n t d e m o n s t r a t e s competency in specifying prior attempts to address the economic needs of the locale.

%Ï S t u d e n t g i v e s a d e t a i l e d description of determining factors for jurisdiction’s economic status. 13 to >12 pts Proficient Student situates the economic needs found in the context of this locale. Student conducts independent research to find the “real” reasons for the economic need in this locale including (but not limited to) historical, cultural, societal, and economic overview. 12 to >0 pts Developing Student attempts to explain the context and economic hardships and/or challenges facing this locale, but because a context too large or too small was chosen, a strong case for choosing this locale is unable to be made. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts SWOT 15 to >13 pts Advanced Students demonstrates superior skill in assessing the scope and severity of challenges and potential facing the jurisdiction. 13 to >12 pts Proficient Student articulately summarizes SWOT in this locale. Student uses individual living/working experiences in this location as a part of his/her research. 12 to >0 pts Developing Student attempts to address SWOT in this locale, but it is evident that the analysis was not balanced as they focused on one area less than the others. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Case Study: Economic Development Action Plan Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320 Criteria Ratings Points Legal and public policy issues 15 to >13 pts Advanced Student clearly communicates the political feasibility associated with a variety of economic development alternatives, specifying with each both the legal and public policy issues involved. 13 to >12 pts Proficient %Ï S t u d e n t n o t e s numerous legal and public policy issues facing this specific local.

%Ï S t u d e n t f u l l y discusses the implications and possible solutions in dealing with these issues as they pertain to economic development and growth of the targeted city or area. 12 to >0 pts Developing %Ï S t u d e n t d i s c u s s e s issues, but is not explicit or specific in the legal and public policy issues facing this locale.

%Ï T h e s t u d e n t i s t o o general and attempts to discuss this part of the assignment without really understanding the culture facing those living in the locale. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Governmental Atmosphere 15 to >13 pts Advanced Student identifies and then prioritizes the major stakeholders associated with specific economic development issues in the jurisdiction, discussing trade-offs and competing goals should such exist in the political climate of governmental operations. 13 to >12 pts Proficient %Ï S t u d e n t d i s c u s s e s unique governance issues, leanings, and challenges in this locale.

%Ï T h e s t u d e n t c r i t i c a l l y analyzes and describes the type of governmental organization employed by this locale.

%Ï S t u d e n t a r t i c u l a t e s the benefits and challenges facing this type of governmental organization and how it impacts economic development. 12 to >0 pts Developing Student situates the governmental atmosphere in this locale, but does so without a critical analysis or understanding of how the local government impacts economic development. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Case Study: Economic Development Action Plan Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320 Criteria Ratings Points Action Plan:

Jurisdiction 50 to >45 pts Advanced Student proposes an action plan uniquely suited to the jurisdiction, specifying not only the appropriate sequence of actions and milestones to be achieved, but does so only after having assessed a variety of alternative implementation strategies that have worked in other comparable jurisdictions. 45 to >41 pts Proficient Student proposes an action plan that includes innovative, creative, out-of-the-box thinking. Very specifically appeals to the audience and the locale chosen for the project. 41 to >0 pts Developing Student proposes an action plan that includes good (but not great or unique) ideas and proposals. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts Action Plan:

Recommendations 50 to >45 pts Advanced Student recommends a means of monitoring progress.

Best practices are clearly identified, citing the locations that generated positive results.

Lessons learned from those successful locations are detailed. 45 to >41 pts Proficient This action plan specifically addresses the economic threats and weaknesses facing this locale.

The student notes how this proposal will impact the strengths and opportunities making sure not to minimize strengths to deal with weaknesses. 41 to >0 pts Developing These proposals do not necessarily represent higher thinking or ideas that could sufficiently create the economic change needed in the locale.

The student fails to connect his/her proposals to the SWOT analysis. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts Formatting, Spelling, and Grammar 25 to >22 pts Advanced Superior work in all areas. 22 to >20 pts Proficient Consistently exceeds expectations in all areas regarding writing style, APA formatting, grammar and spelling. 20 to >0 pts Developing Acceptable work in most areas.

Demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding writing style, APA formatting, grammar, and spelling. 0 pts Not Present 25 pts Case Study: Economic Development Action Plan Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320 Criteria Ratings Points Bibliography 50 to >45 pts Advanced Superior selection of references reflecting best practices in addressing the challenges and the opportunities facing the jurisdiction. 45 to >41 pts Proficient Student has at least one academic, scholarly source per page of his/her paper. No errors – bibliographic information is fully consistent with the latest APA guidelines. 41 to >0 pts Developing %Ï S t u d e n t h a s l e s s than one source per page of his/her paper, or the sources lack full academic rigor.

%Ï S o m e e r r o r s e x i s t regarding bibliographic information.

%Ï S t u d e n t references only reports generated about the jurisdiction 0 pts Not Present 50 pts Total Points: 250 Case Study: Economic Development Action Plan Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320