The student will complete one Discussion: Internal Controls and Ethics Analysis in this course. INSTRUCTIONS The case must be selected from Sections two through five of the Knapp casebooks (Contempora

Case Summary 10 to >9.0 pts Advanced Case summary includes all key elements in enough detail that the reader need not read the case to understand the audit problems. 9 to >7.0 pts Proficient Case summary includes all key elements, but not in enough detail that the reader need not read the case to understand the audit problems. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing Case summary includes some, but not all, key elements in enough detail that the reader need not read the case to understand the audit problems. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Thread:

Answers to the Case Questions 50 to >45.0 pts Advanced Case questions are answered correctly with sufficient pages to support the answers. The answers are written in detail and in what could be described as an exceptional or eloquent manner. 45 to >41.0 pts Proficient Case questions are answered correctly with sufficient pages to support the answers. 41 to >0.0 pts Developing Some, but not all case questions are answered correctly with sufficient pages to support the answers. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts Thread:

Support by references 35 to >31.0 pts Advanced The student’s answers are supported by more than 7 references cited and listed in the APA format. 31 to >28.0 pts Proficient The student’s answers are supported by 5, 6 or 7 references cited and listed in the APA format. 28 to >0.0 pts Developing The student’s answers are supported by less than 5 references cited and listed in the APA format. 0 pts Not Present 35 pts Thread:

APA/Format 45 to >40.0 pts Advanced Proper spelling and grammar are used with zero or one error. The APA format is used for both citations and the list of references. 40 to >37.0 pts Proficient Proper spelling and grammar are used with two errors. The APA format is used for both citations and the list of references. 37 to >0.0 pts Developing Proper spelling and grammar are used with more than two errors. The APA format is used for either the citations or the list of references. 0 pts Not Present 45 pts Discussion Grading Rubric | ACCT622_D01_202340 Criteria Ratings Points Thread:

Christian Worldview Statement 10 to >9.0 pts Advanced There is a clear statement of the auditor’s adherence to or divergence from a Christian worldview, based on the auditor’s work and supported by more than one Bible verse. 9 to >7.0 pts Proficient There is a clear statement of the auditor’s adherence to or divergence from a Christian worldview, based on the auditor’s work and supported by one Bible verse. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing There is a statement of the auditor’s adherence to or divergence from a Christian worldview, based on the auditor’s work, but the statement is not clear and/or is not supported by a Bible Verse. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Reply:

Case Summary 10 to >9.0 pts Advanced An opinion is expressed regarding the appropriateness of the preparer’s case summary. The name of the case and of the preparer is given. If the case summary would be improved by adding additional comments about the case, state this and also give the additional comments. If no additional comments are needed, state this. 9 to >7.0 pts Proficient Most, but not all, of the items needed to reach the Advanced level are included in the critique. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing Less than most of the items needed to reach the Advanced level are included in the critique. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Reply:

Answers to the Case Questions 30 to >27.0 pts Advanced Each question is written. An opinion is given as to the appropriateness of the preparer’s solution to each question, on a question-by-question basis. Your opinions are supported by references, whether in support for the preparer’s answers or in disagreement with the preparer’s answers. 27 to >24.0 pts Proficient Most, but not all, of the items needed to reach the Advanced level are included in the critique. 24 to >0.0 pts Developing Less than most of the items needed to reach the Advanced level are included in the critique. 0 pts Not Present 30 pts Reply:

Support by references 20 to >17.0 pts Advanced The critique is supported by more than four references that were not used by the preparer. 17 to >16.0 pts Proficient The critique is supported by four references that were not used by the preparer. 16 to >0.0 pts Developing The critique is supported by fewer than four references that were not used by the preparer. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts Discussion Grading Rubric | ACCT622_D01_202340 Criteria Ratings Points Reply:

Christian Worldview Statement 10 to >9.0 pts Advanced There is a clear statement that the preparer included a Christian Worldview Statement. There is a clear statement that you agree with the preparer’s assessment of the Christian Worldview held by the auditor, or that you do not agree. An additional Bible reference is included in the critique. 9 to >7.0 pts Proficient Most, but not all, of the items needed to reach the Advanced level are included in the critique. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing Less than most of the items needed to reach the Advanced level are included in the critique. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Reply:

APA/Format 30 to >27.0 pts Advanced Proper spelling and grammar are used with zero or one error. The APA format is used for both citations and the list of references. 27 to >24.0 pts Proficient There are two errors in spelling or in English usage. The APA format is used for both citations and the list of references. 24 to >0.0 pts Developing There are more than two errors in spelling or in English usage.

The APA format is used for either the citations or the list of references. 0 pts Not Present 30 pts Total Points: 250 Discussion Grading Rubric | ACCT622_D01_202340