| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder. | | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. | 13 to >11.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. | 11 to >10.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. | 10 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing. |
| 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. | | 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. | 22 to >19.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. | 19 to >17.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. | 17 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. |
| 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. | | 30 to >26.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. | 26 to >23.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. | 23 to >20.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. | 20 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing. |
| 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. | | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | 13 to >11.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | 11 to >10.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. | 10 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. |
| 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. | 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. | 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. | 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
| 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors | 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors | 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding |
| 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Uses correct APA format with no errors | 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Contains 1-2 APA format errors | 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains 3-4 APA format errors | 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains five or more APA format errors |
| 5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
