In this module, you will continue to learn about action research and how it is used in classrooms across the world. You will also write, in proper APA format, your first reflection. Use the reflection
Article-Video-Website Response RUBRIC
Class: EDUC ____
Student Name: Grade
| OUTCOME | Below expectations | Approaches expectations | Meets expectations | Exceeds expectations |
| 0-69% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-100 % | |
| Accuracy and Support | Entry is incomplete, unsatisfactory and/ or submitted late. Little attention to format | Apparent problems with accuracy of response. Lack of support. Careless format | Conclusions and/or opinions are Adequately supported with satisfactory format | Conclusions and/or opinions are logical and well supported from text. Complete and satisfactory entry. Professional format. |
| Summary | Does not summarize the resource in any meaningful way. Summary almost completely misunderstands the article or is extremely inaccurate or incomplete. | Summarizes the resource but leaves may have major inaccuracies or misunderstandings of information presented. | Summarizes the resource fully, but may have minor inaccuracies or misunderstandings of subject matter. | Summary is comprehensive and insightful, yet concise. |
| Critical Thought | Does not use knowledge of the subject or general scholarly knowledge to evaluate the article critically. Substitutes personal reaction for critical thought giving the impression that the author either does not know has weak understanding of the subject. | Critically evaluates the article but does not apply general scholarly knowledge appropriate for a course at this level. Does apply knowledge of the subject and/or general scholarly knowledge, and inserts too much personal opinion without enough support. | Uses knowledge of the subject, including orthodox and heterodox paradigms to evaluate the article critically. May use scholarly knowledge from this and other courses for critical evaluation. Personal opinion based on resource. | Makes exceptionally good use of knowledge of the subject to evaluate the article critically. Uses scholarly knowledge from this and other courses for critical evaluation. Validates personal opinions from resource. |
| Organization | Minimally put together; weak job of integration; incoherent or without logical flow | Covers main points; adequate organization; not altogether clear. | Adequate Organization; made use of resource headings and topics. Clear and logical. | Logical organization of points and well-reviewed through very effective use of topics and headings; a good synthesis that is easy to follow. |
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
