Assignment based on the field trip to Brady Road Resource Management Facility (BRRMF) , Winnipeg: The objective of this assignment is to 1) To understand the process and techniques involved in solid

ENVR/GEOG 3850 BRRMF Assignment

CATEGORY

Excellent/Exceptional

Good/Very Good

Adequate/Satisfactory

Marginal/Fail

Introduction &

Topic and Conclusion

/10

Exceptional introduction that discusses the topic & significance/ background

The reader can definitively predict the body structure of the paper.

Conclusion- Exceptional review of key concepts. Insightful discussion & impact of researched material on topic.

Proficient introduction that states the topic, & significance/ background

The reader can mostly predict the body structure of the paper.

Conclusion- Proficient review of key concepts. Discusses impact of researched material on topic.

Adequate introduction that states the topic, & touches on significance, background,

The reader can vaguely predict the body structure of the paper.

Conclusion- Adequate review of key conclusions. Touches on impact of researched material on topic.

Limited introduction that states topic but lacks significance/ background,.

Conclusion- Vague/no review of key conclusions. Minimal integration of concepts

May introduce new information.

Content

/15

Balanced presentation of accurate information that clearly supports a central purpose that is relevant to the assignment question/goals.

Information shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis relevant material.

Exceptionally integrates Sustainability concepts.

Thoroughly&expertly acknowledges sources using in-text citations.

Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument that is relevant to the assignment question/goals.

Information displays good evidence of analysis of relevant.

Mostly integrates sustainability concepts.

Appropriately acknowledges sources using in-text citations.

Information provides adequate support for a central purpose or argument but may and/or may not be entirely relevant to the assignment question/goals.

Information adequately displays evidence of a basic analysis.

Adequately integrates sustainability concepts.

Acknowledges some sources using in-text citations.

Information provides minimal if any support for a central purpose or argument and is mostly not relevant to the assignment question or goals.

Information displays littleor no evidence of analysis.

Minimal if any integration of sustainability concepts.

Minimallyor fails to acknowledge sources using in-text citations.

. . . .Continued on next page . . . .


CATEGORY

Excellent/Exceptional

Good/Very Good

Adequate/Satisfactory

Marginal/Fail

Quality, Credibility, Variety

Of Sources and formatting

/5

 

All sources come from highly credible scholarly materials.

Clearly demonstrates alternate perspectives & variety of sources (author/journal/type)

All citations& paper components are formatted correctly in the document.

 

Most sources come from reasonable credible, scholarly materials.

Several alternate perspectives identified & a good variety of sources (author/journal/type).

Most citations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document.

 

Some sources come from credible, scholarly materials.

Minimal alternate perspectives identified &minimal variety of sources (author/journal/type).

Some citations& paper components are formatted correctly in the document.

 

Few sources if any come from credible, scholarly materials.

Few alternate perspectives identified & a poor variety of sources (author/journal/type).

Few, if any citations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document.

Writing Fluency

/5

Virtually free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, & spelling errors.

Consistently &expertly utilizes formal academic tone & writing protocols.

Occasional minorerrors do not distract the reader.

Good utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols.

Some significant errors are present, but the overall meaning is clear

Some utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols.

Errors are distracting, the meaning may not be entirely clear.

Minimal if any utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols.