Create a presentation (PowerPoint, Google Slides, Canva, etc.) on the Botanic Puzzle Maze Experiment, covering specific sections. Begin with an introduction slide including your name and date. Present

Botanic Puzzle Maze Presentation

Create a presentation (PowerPoint, Google Slides, Canva, etc.) on the Botanic Puzzle Maze Experiment, covering specific sections. Begin with an introduction slide including your name and date. Present an introduction detailing the experiment's purpose and significance. Include a slide with your formulated hypothesis and its justification. Then, describe the materials used, maze construction, light condition simulation, and planting process. Outline the experiment's duration and monitoring schedule. Display collected data using charts and tables, ensuring at least two labeled photos per week as specified. Interpret the results in relation to the hypothesis and discuss unexpected outcomes and findings' implications. Conclude with a summary of key findings, confirming or rejecting the hypothesis, and suggesting further research. Maintain an engaging design, use visuals effectively, and cite references on a dedicated slide. Aim for brevity, clarity, and impactful content.

I have included an outline and a rubric to guide you.

I. Introduction

A. Background information on plant growth and light

B. Purpose and objectives of the experiment

C. Overview of the maze setup in a shoebox

II. Hypothesis

A. Prediction of plant growth in varying light conditions within the maze

B. Justification for the hypothesis

III. Materials and Methodology

A. List of materials used (shoebox, cardboard, plants, light source, etc.)

B. Detailed explanation of the maze construction process

C. Description of how different light conditions were simulated within the maze

D. Planting process and placement within the maze

IV. Experimental Procedure

A. Duration of the experiment

B. Monitoring and data collection schedule

V. Results and Data Analysis

A. Presentation of collected data (charts, graphs, tables)

You must include at least two photos per week and they should be labeled WITH dates.

VI. Discussion

A. Interpretation of the results in relation to the hypothesis

B. Explanation of any unexpected outcomes

C. Relevance of the findings and implications

VII. Conclusion

A. Summary of key findings

B. Confirmation or rejection of the hypothesis

C. Suggestions for further research or experiments

Criteria	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Fair (2)	Poor (1)
I. Introduction
- Provides comprehensive background information, clearly states the purpose and objectives, and offers a detailed overview of the maze setup in the shoebox.	Offers thorough background information, articulates purpose and objectives well, and provides a good overview of the maze setup.	Provides some background information and states purpose and objectives, but lacks detail in explaining the maze setup.	Lacks sufficient background information, clarity in purpose, objectives, and explanation of the maze setup.
II. Hypothesis
- Formulates a clear and testable hypothesis related to plant growth in varying light conditions within the maze. Offers a well-reasoned justification for the hypothesis.	Formulates a testable hypothesis and provides a reasonable justification.	Formulates a hypothesis but lacks clarity or specificity. Justification is somewhat weak.	Does not formulate a clear hypothesis or justification is missing or insufficient.
III. Materials and Methodology
- Provides a comprehensive list of materials used and offers a detailed explanation of the maze construction process, simulation of light conditions, and planting process/placement within the maze.	Provides a good list of materials used and explains the maze construction process, light condition simulation, and planting process/placement with some detail.	Provides a basic list of materials used and offers limited explanation of the maze construction process, light condition simulation, and planting process/placement.	Provides an incomplete or inaccurate list of materials and lacks explanation of the maze construction process, light condition simulation, and planting process/placement.
IV. Experimental Procedure
- Clearly states the duration of the experiment and outlines a detailed monitoring/data collection schedule.	States the duration and offers a monitoring/data collection schedule with some detail.	States the duration but lacks clarity or detail in the monitoring/data collection schedule.	Does not state the duration or provides an unclear monitoring/data collection schedule.
V. Results and Data Analysis
- Presents collected data effectively using charts, graphs, and tables. Includes at least two labeled photos per week as specified.	Presents collected data using charts, graphs, and tables but with minor inconsistencies. Includes some labeled photos per week.	Presents data with significant inconsistencies or lacks the required labeled photos per week.	Inadequate presentation of collected data. Missing or incorrect labeled photos per week.
VI. Discussion
- Provides insightful interpretation of results in relation to the hypothesis, explains unexpected outcomes, and discusses the relevance of findings and implications.	Offers interpretation of results but lacks depth or fails to relate them to the hypothesis adequately. Explains some unexpected outcomes. Discusses relevance and implications but lacks depth.	Offers limited or unclear interpretation of results. Fails to explain unexpected outcomes or discuss relevance and implications adequately.	Does not interpret results or fails to relate them to the hypothesis. Does not explain unexpected outcomes or discuss relevance and implications.
VII. Conclusion
- Presents a comprehensive summary of key findings derived from the experiment. Confirms or rejects the hypothesis based on experimental results. Offers insightful suggestions for further research or experiments.	Provides a summary of key findings but lacks completeness. Makes a statement about the hypothesis but lacks clarity. Offers some suggestions for further research but lacks depth.	Offers a basic summary of key findings with significant omissions. Makes an unclear statement about the hypothesis. Provides limited or unclear suggestions for further research.	Summary of key findings is incomplete or unclear. Statement about the hypothesis is missing or unclear. No suggestions provided for further research.