Supply Chain Management Case Study

SCM 800

West Marine Case Team Assignment Spring 2024

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: This deliverable IS a group assignment. You are on your honor. You cannot discuss any aspect of this case, or anything related to it with any other teams. You cannot use any outside resources other than your notes, course articles and material, and your own team members. One of the biggest problems I have encountered with this assignment is plagiarism. Please cite any sources you may use.


IMPORTANT!!! You cannot utilize any research on the Internet (including the use of AI such as ChatGPT) to seek answers for this assignment. I am looking for your analysis only--these assignments are not research ones and do not require any outside information other than material given in the course lessons.


Also, use of previous work concerning this assignment will be considered an Academic Integrity violation and will result in at least a zero for the assignment plus potentially additional sanctions to the final grade in the class.


Assignment Document:

This document includes the following assignment information needed to complete this case assignment:

  1. Assignment Objectives

  2. Assignment Introduction

  3. Assignment Directions

  4. Assignment Guidelines and Requirements

  5. Assignment Questions

  6. Grading Criteria

  7. Cover Page and Academic Integrity Pledge

  8. Checklist

I. Assignment Objectives:

The goal of this assignment is to utilize concepts mastered and apply them in a real-world setting. West Marine explores various themes including but not limited to the following:

  1. Evaluate CPFR and its impact of a firm.

  2. Explore issues surrounding collaboration and coordination in a supply chain environment.

  3. Analyze the impact of mergers and acquisitions on supply chain management.

  4. Illustrate implementation challenges and propose solutions utilizing CPFR.

  5. Specify and analyze various costing issues.

  6. Assess risk and mitigation strategies.

II. Assignment Introduction:

This real-world case assignment is designed to help students evaluate the use of a collaborative approach to integrating across the SCOR processes of Plan, Source and Deliver (Customer Fulfillment) within the context of a retail environment. Teams will assess the firm’s supply chain before and after the implementation of CPFR. They will analyze the existing supply chain’s problems, propose solutions, and will critically evaluate the CPFR process—including its strengths, weaknesses, implementation challenges, and operational issues.

III. Assignment Directions:

Your team’s responses to the West Marine assignment questions are to be organized into a professional PowerPoint presentation of approximately 8 to 10 slides. Prepare the presentation in the "Normal" view, utilizing a portrait format to make liberal use of the “Notes” feature on all slides. PowerPoint slides, by necessity, must be brief. Therefore, use the notes feature to justify or more fully explain the bullet point content of a slide.

Do not leave the instructor guessing on the meaning of a particular slide. You might think of the notes as containing material you would state if you were verbally presenting your slides. Please, do not write volumes in the notes section. Be concise but clear on the meaning of each slide.

All your extra information about a slide must fit on that 8.5 by 11 portrait version of the “Notes” page for a slide. Also do not re-write the question on the notes slide. Please just write Q1, Q2, Q3, etc. at the top of the notes section. Please be certain to address each part of each question set and indicate the subparts (for example Part A, etc.) in the notes section of the slide.

Also, consider adding a Tag Line to the top of each slide succinctly answering the key take away or of the slide. Another way to think of this is if someone was in a hurry, could the reader obtain a general sense of the key messages based on reading each slide’s tag line.

The presentation should begin with a brief introduction giving some background on the case and stating the purpose (Objectives/Goals Type Slide) and organization of the presentation (Agenda Type Slide). The introduction should then be followed by your response to each of the assignment questions. There are multiple sets of questions associated with this case and most of the questions contain multiple parts or sub-questions.

The final slide should be a summary slide which explains the next action steps in the process that should occur. Please do not say items like “email me if you want more information’…. I am looking for concrete steps.

When you are asked to make a choice or take a position in answering a question, be certain to present the argument or justification for your choice. In support of your position, it is often useful to draw on the literature that you have read for the course.

Note: Arguments can be used to positively affirm a particular position as well as to indicate that alternatives are not worthy of support. In other words, sometimes you can support a position by effectively arguing against other alternatives.

The two biggest problems I find with these types of presentations and team assignments are as follows:

  1. Teams do not answer all the assigned questions and sub parts of those questions.

  2. All team members do not review all answers prior to submission--leading to incorrect, incomplete, and less than satisfactory responses. This problem is huge. We strongly suggest all members of the team re-read all the information in the syllabus and in other areas of this course discussing how all team members must participate is all aspects of the case.

  3. Teams do not use enough examples as they justify a position.

Please note: The team should place citations on the slides as needed that illustrate the problems/questions/goals/objectives, etc. you are trying to obtain.

Consequently, when you submit information and the report, it needs to be compiled in a professional, well-analyzed, and thoughtful manner. Additionally, please make sure all items are professionally formatted.

See the Course Schedule for due dates for these deliverables.


IV. Assignment Guidelines, Requirements, and Formatting:

  1. Your team’s responses should be organized into a professional PowerPoint presentation of approximately 8 to 10 slides. Is the presentation concise & succinct?

  2. All extra information about a slide must fit on that 8.5 by 11 portrait version of the “Notes” page for a slide.

  3. Do not use any pdf type files in your submittals---pptx only. PPTX should be formatted to print the slide and notes section.

  4. The presentation must be formatted for single sided printing (no double-sided reports). Please preview print before submitting-make sure it is formatted correctly.

  5. Please read the attached grading rubric for additional information that will be considered when the assignment is graded.

  6. Use bullets on the slides…no long sentences or paragraphs.

  7. Does the PowerPoint deck contain an agenda slide and objectives slide? Not counted as part of the total.

  8. Does the PowerPoint deck have a summary slide? (Not counted as part of the total.)

  9. Please use proper citations, when necessary, on the appropriate slides. Do not plagiarize.

  10. Please include & use the enclosed cover page or similar page transcribed to PPT.

  11. Points will be deducted for not following formatting directions and not answering all assignment questions.


  1. Utilize graphics or even a short video to help emphasize a concept or elaborate on an answer to a question.

  2. Any appendices type slides must be numbered and have a title. You cannot have more than one appendix per slide. You can only use one side of the paper.

  3. All work must be completed in a professional manner.

  4. Please note: We do not have pre-grading of any of the assignments.

  5. Font size and type are your choice: however, make sure it is readable in a presentation mode…to small of a font will result in a deduction of points.

  6. We do not allow resubmittal of the assignment after it is graded.

  7. You will have only one document downloaded to the drop box:

  1. The actual document in PPTX type file extension. This deck will include use of the ‘notes’ portion.

  2. No other documents are required…no Excel files, Word documents, etc.

V. Assignment Questions: Please answer the following questions in your presentation:

Note: The instructor reserves the right to change the points for this assignment and these questions at his discretion. Points shown below are only approximate and may change.

Question 1 through Question 4 pertains to WM after the E&B Marine acquisition.

Question 1: This module introduced the CPFR Model with the four process steps.  Please be sure to review the teaching video posted that discusses the CPFR Model and the associated quadrants.  (30 Total Points:) Based upon the case study answer the following items:

  1. Which one of the four quadrants does your team believe that West Marine may have utilized first. List the quadrant number and the quadrant title. 

  2. Explain your teams reasoning.

  3. What might be the biggest impediment to making that process work?

  4. How might you mitigate that problem?

Question 2: What supply chain improvements were necessary for WM to turnaround its supply chain performance? (30 total points) Discuss each improvement separately.

  • The intent of this question is for you to probe the case for the most important underlying problems and there causes that WM must address. You must define the problem before you can solve the problem!

  • An average response will identify at least two improvements. A top-level response will identify three. Do not exceed three! We are not looking for extensive lists---We are looking for depth and breadth.

  • Also, be sure to explain or make an argument justifying why your solution solves an existing problem.

Scroll Down To The Next Page For Questions 3 and 4!

Question 3: Why is CPFR important? How did CPFR help WM address its supply chain challenges? (30 total points)

  • This question consists of two parts: Why and How! Discuss each item separately.

  • Be specific and freely use examples from the case when responding to this question! The lack of examples from the case is a typical area where students lose points.





Question 4: Is WM ready for the Boat U.S. acquisition? YES, or No…you cannot pick both. Take a stand! What are its primary supply chain problems --- as they relate to CPFR? What are the risks associated with each one of those problems? Explain your reasoning and how it might tie back into previous modules. (30 total points)

  • For this set of questions, be certain that you focus on the Boat U.S. acquisition!

  • An average response will identify at least two items. A top-level response will identify three. Do not exceed three! I am not looking for extensive lists---We are looking for depth and breadth. Discuss each risk separately.

Scroll Down To The Next Page For The Grading Criteria!























VI. Grading Criteria: West Marine PowerPoint Presentation Assignment:


(The instructor reserves the right to change the grading criteria for this assignment without notice.)


PowerPoint presentations are another communication device that stresses organizing thoughts in the appropriate hierarchy and sequence, selecting words for their power and expressiveness, using technical terms in appropriate contexts, representing complex data and symbols precisely in prose.

They require the use of appropriate business language; do not use slang language, or colloquialisms, etc.

Analysis: (About 120 points)

  1. Does the PowerPoint presentation answer each of the questions?

  2. Does each answer to a question contain analysis of the major issues?

  3. Does the analysis for each question incorporate concepts/techniques from all readings.

  4. (including previous modules)?

  5. Does the analysis effectively incorporate information from the case?

  6. Does the analysis show relationships among important factors?

  7. Are assumptions explicitly stated?

  8. Does the analysis isolate fundamental causes of the problems?

  9. Does the analysis contain enough detail to support recommendations, causes and

  10. effects, etc.?

  11. When the analysis is undertaken does it use the information at its disposal correctly,

  12. thereby leading to correct answers.

  13. Does the presentation utilize the information and apply it to today’s environment?

  14. Are the risks associated with this case discussed in detail?

  15. Do the notes section of the slides contain enough detail to explain the slides?

Quality of Professional PowerPoint Slides: (About 60 points)

  1. Are the slides logically organized?

  2. Is the presentation readable and does it flow with continuity?

  3. Are rules of grammar, punctuation, spelling, sentence and/or paragraph construction,

  4. uppercase/lower case, etc. followed?

  5. Is the PowerPoint presentation concise & succinct and only 8 to 10 slides in length?

  6. Do the slides support, amplify, and clarify your answers?

  7. Do the slides represent correct information?

  8. Is the presentation visually attractive?

  9. Was the “Notes” section in PowerPoint utilized to add depth to the presentation?

  10. Do the slides use a common font, theme, layout, size, upper/lower case letters, etc.?

  11. Does the PowerPoint deck contain an agenda slide, overview, or objectives slide?

  12. Does the deck contain a schematic of the supply chain that is under analysis?

  13. Does the deck contain a summary slide that lists the “next steps” that should be taken to

  14. move the process forward?

  15. Do the PowerPoint slides have graphics, a short video, etc. that help to emphasize your

  16. points? You must explain in the “Notes” sections how this clip adds to your answer!

  17. Were citations used on the appropriate slide or note section?

Overall Criteria: (About 20 points)

  1. Is the PowerPoint presentation logically consistent and effectively structured--so it sells

  2. its ideas?

  3. Is there a high likelihood that the recommendations will achieve their intended results?

Please Scroll Down to The Cover Sheet and Checklist

  1. West Marine Case Cover Sheet and Academic Integrity Pledge

Team Number: __________Date Submitted: ___________________GRADE: __________ /200

Individual Team Member Names:

Team Member’s Name ___________________________ Email _______________

Team Member’s Name ___________________________ Email _______________

Team Member’s Name ___________________________ Email _______________

Team Member’s Name ___________________________ Email _______________

Team Member’s Name ___________________________ Email _______________

Team Member’s Name ___________________________ Email _______________

PLEASE SIGN THE FOLLOWING PLEDGE:

If it is not signed, you will not be given a grade!

I, ____________________________________________ <Your Name>, affirm that I have neither given, received, nor witnessed unauthorized aid on this assignment and have completed this work honestly and according to the professor’s guidelines and the Smeal Honor Code!

I, ____________________________________________ <Your Name>, affirm that I have neither given, received, nor witnessed unauthorized aid on this assignment and have completed this work honestly and according to the professor’s guidelines and the Smeal Honor Code!


I, ____________________________________________ <Your Name>, affirm that I have neither given, received, nor witnessed unauthorized aid on this assignment and have completed this work honestly and according to the professor’s guidelines and the Smeal Honor Code!

I, ____________________________________________ <Your Name>, affirm that I have neither given, received, nor witnessed unauthorized aid on this assignment and have completed this work honestly and according to the professor’s guidelines and the Smeal Honor Code!

I, ____________________________________________ <Your Name>, affirm that I have neither given, received, nor witnessed unauthorized aid on this assignment and have completed this work honestly and according to the professor’s guidelines and the Smeal Honor Code!

I, ____________________________________________ <Your Name>, affirm that I have neither given, received, nor witnessed unauthorized aid on this assignment and have completed this work honestly and according to the professor’s guidelines and the Smeal Honor Code!


  1. West Marine Case Assignment Checklist: This sheet is for your use only. Do not submit this sheet to us.

    1. Deliverables:

    1. Completed Yes/No?

    1. Comments:

    1. Did the team answer all questions?

    1. Did the team answer all subparts of all questions?

    1. Did the team review the grading criteria?

    1. Does your presentation meet those requirements.

    1. Did the team use the provided Cover Sheet?

    1. Team number, each team member’s name and email address, date, name of assignment

    1. PowerPoint Slide Presentation (10 slides)

    1. PowerPoint slides…pptx file extension

    2. Portrait mode/must all fit on 8.5 by 11 page/use notes section for more detail but still must fit on 8.5 by 11 page NO PDF FILES ALLOWED

    1. Objectives/Goals Type Slide

    1. PowerPoint Slide…. Does not count toward the 10-slide total. NO PDF FILES ALLOWED

    1. Agenda Type Slide

    1. PowerPoint Slide…. Does not count toward the 10-slide total. NO PDF FILES ALLOWED

    1. Summary slide including next action steps

    1. PowerPoint Slide…. NO PDF FILES ALLOWED

    1. This Checklist Sheet

    1. This sheet is for your use only. Do not submit this sheet to us.

10