Hey can you please do this for me

1 The assignment is worth a total of 18 marks . For more detailed information, please look at the assignment sheet for the exact breakdown of marks per question. If you have questions about the assignment or rubric please email both of the TAs since they will be the ones grading your assignments. Please look at the resources posted on eClass for this assignment. The Purdue Owl website is also a great resource for APA: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_overview_and_workshop.html Introduction (2 points) Neither criteria is appropriately met ( 0 marks ) One criteria is not met OR answers provided are not detailed. ( 1 mark ) Summary of the article provided including its main research question. Hypothesis is clearly stated. (2 marks) Methodology (3 points) No criteria is met 1 of the questions is 2 of the 3 questions are Research design used in the study is described. (0 marks) answered in detail OR details are lacking for all questions answered in detail (2 marks) Appropriateness of the chosen design in relation to the research question is evaluated. (1 mark) Sample size, recruitment methods, and any potential biases in participant selection is discussed. (3 marks) Data Analysis : (3 points) No criteria is met (0 marks) 1 of the questions is answered in detail OR 2 of the 3 questions are answered in detail Statistical techniques employed in the study are outlined (e.g., t - tests, ANOVA, regression) details are lacking for all questions (1 mark) (2 marks) Appropriateness of the chosen statistical analyses in relation to the research design and data collected is critiqued. Clarity of the presentation of results, including tables, figures, and explanations of statistical findings is assessed (3 marks) PSYCH 223: ASSIGNMENT #2 RUBRIC 2 Conclusions and Implications: (2 points) Neither criteria is appropriately met ( 0 marks ) One criteria is not met OR answers provided are not detailed. ( 1 mark ) The conclusions drawn by the authors based on the study's findings are summarized Whether the conclusions align with the study's results and research question is evaluated (2 marks) Critical Assessment: (5 points) No criteria is met (0 marks) 1 of the questions is answered in detail OR details are lacking for all questions 2 of the 3 questions are answered in detail (all parts of the question are answered) (3 marks) Strengths and weaknesses are clearly identified. Evidence from the article OR relevant sources (not necessary) is used to support your evaluations. Why are these strengths and weaknesses? (2 marks) The overall contribution of the research article to the field of lifespan development is critiqued. Did it advance our understanding of the topic? Implications for future research are listed. Suggestions for how the study could be improved or extended are provided (5 marks) APA Format and Writing Style: (3 points) APA format is not followed and writing quality is very poor (0 marks) There are more than 2 APA errors and/or there are many writing style issues There are 1 - 2 APA errors and/or there are minor writing style errors (2 marks) There are no APA errors for the entire assignment. This includes cover page/header, your answers, and the reference page. BOTH in - text citations and a reference page is provided. (1 mark) Spelling, grammar, proofreading type errors, writing clarity and quality. Assignment is in PDF Format . (3 marks)