its a leadership assignment please make sure no plagiarism and look at the rubrics to get a good grade
1 | P a g e LDR301C/MGT300C : Grading Rubrics for Reflective Journal Assignment Winter 2024 Performance Elements or Criteria Excellent (mid -80s -100) : Good (70 -low 80s): Adequate (50s -69): Substandard (0 -49): Re flection on existing knowledge (30 %) Critically r eviews existing knowledge, questions assumptions, and articulates new perspectives as a result of experience Active and careful consideration of existing knowledge and articulates new understanding of knowledge as a result of experience Makes use of existing knowledge without an attempt to evaluate/ appraise knowledge; demonstrates understanding but does not relate to other experiences or personal reaction Automatic/superficial responses with little conscious/deliberate thought or referenc e to existing knowledge; responses are offered without attempting to understand them Connection to academic concepts (30 %) Demonstrates superior connection between experience and class content (concepts/theories) and literature; evidence of application of theory and reconstruction of perspecti ve Demonstrates clear connections between experience and class content (concepts/ theories ); evidence of application of theory Connects experience with class content (concepts/ theories) but remains superficial or abstract Connections are not drawn between experience and class content (concepts/ theories) or literature Evidence of development (30 %) Articulates transformation of their perspective of themselves or about a particular issue/concep t/ problem as a result of experience Articulates new understanding/insig hts about self or particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience Limited/superficial insight about self or particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience No evidence of insights about self or particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience Re ferences (10 %) All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors. Some cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format.Inco nsistencies evident Few cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format Absent Source: Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Kam, F., & Wong, Y. (2008). A four -category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessme nt & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 369 -379. https://brocku.ca/pedagogical -innovation/wp - content/uploads/sites/53/Critical -Reflection -Rubric.pdf
