Term Paper – United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Development Strategy for Canada This assignment is to better understand and analyze The United Nations Sustainable Develo
2
ENVR 3850- Term Paper
CATEGORY | Excellent/Exceptional | Good/Very Good | Adequate/Satisfactory | Marginal/Fail |
Introduction to the Topic /10 | Exceptional introduction that discusses the topic & significance/ background The reader can definitively predict the body structure of the paper. | Proficient introduction that states the topic, & significance/ background The reader can mostly predict the body structure of the paper. | Adequate introduction that states the topic, &touches on significance, background The reader canvaguely predict the body structure of the paper. | Limited introduction that states topic but lacks significance/ background, |
Content /15 | Balanced presentation of accurate information that clearly supports a central purpose that is relevant to the assignment question/goals. Information shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of relevant material. Thoroughly & expertly acknowledges sources using in-text citations. | Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument that is relevant to the assignment question/goals. Information displays good evidence of analysis of relevant. Appropriately acknowledges sources using in-text citations. | Information provides adequate support for a central purpose or argument but may and/or may not be entirely relevant to the assignment question/goals. Information adequately displays evidence of a basic analysis. Acknowledges some sources using in-text citations. | Information provides minimal if any support for a central purpose or argument and is mostly not relevant to the assignment question or goals. Information displays little or no evidence of analysis. . Minimally or fails to acknowledge sources using in-text citations. |
Conclusion /5 | Exceptional review of key concepts. Insightful discussion & impact of researched material on topic. | Proficient review of key concepts. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. | Adequate review of key conclusions. Touches on impact of researched material on topic. | Vague/no review of key conclusions. Minimal integration of concepts May introduce new information. |
. . . .Continued on next page . . . .
CATEGORY | Excellent/Exceptional | Good/Very Good | Adequate/Satisfactory | Marginal/Fail |
Quality, Credibility, Variety of References and Reference format Sources /5 |
All sources come from highly credible scholarly materials. All citations& paper components are formatted correctly in the document |
Most sources come from reasonable credible, scholarly materials. Most citations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document. |
Some sources come from credible, scholarly materials. Some citations& paper components are formatted correctly in the document. |
Few sources if any come from credible, scholarly materials. Few, if any citations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document. |
Writing Fluency /5 | Virtually free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, & spelling errors. Consistently &expertly utilizes formal academic tone & writing protocols. | Occasional minor errors do not distract the reader. Good utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols. | Some significant errors are present, but the overall meaning is clear Some utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols. | Errors are distracting, the meaning may not be entirely clear. Minimal if any utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols. |