****2 separate assignments . The first assignment makes small changes to the abstract according to the teachers' feedback. the paper is in the files *** Teacher feedback ( You need to make sure the ab
27
Implementing Targeted Socioeconomic Interventions to Improve Academic Performance in Low-Income Students
Alexis S. Brown
Schreiner University
Implementing Targeted Socioeconomic Interventions to Improve Academic Performance in Low-Income Students
Abstract
This paper will investigate the effectiveness of developing targeted socioeconomic interventions to improve the academic performance of low-income students. Improving academic performance will address the persistent achievement gap between high-income and low-income students, facilitating equality regardless of student's economic group. This study will use the mixed-methods approach to explore the impacts of interventions such as financial aid, mentorship programs, and educational resources and how they are likely to affect the student's performance. The literature review of the paper will highlight several inequalities faced by low-income students and identify possible interventions that can be adopted with the aim of addressing these socioeconomic inequalities. We plan to use quantitative and qualitative methodologies to collect and analyze data. The findings from the data collected will show the importance of targeted interventions, which will be tailored to the specific needs of the low-income student. The paper will conclude by advocating for policies promoting academic inclusiveness, thus closing the achievement gap between students from low and high socioeconomic backgrounds.
Keywords: Social economic interventions, Academic performance, Achievement gap, mentorship programs, and inequalities.
Introduction
In modern education, the achievement gap has become a critical issue that divides students' performance based on their economic backgrounds. Students emerging from low-income families often face significant barriers that hold them back from reaching and achieving their full potential. In this essay, we will explore how the economic background of a student affects their academic performance and initiatives that can be employed to boost their academic performance. The study will not only explore how economic backgrounds affect student performance; it will employ a mixed-methods approach where we will combine quantitative and qualitative data collection methods in a curriculum set to identify effective approaches that can be used to narrow the gap for students emerging from different socioeconomic groups. Through the research process, we will explore the characteristics of interventions that determine student's success and provide evidence that could help all students succeed regardless of various factors.
Research Question
How do targeted socioeconomic interventions impact the academic performance of low-income students, and what are the key factors influencing the effectiveness of these interventions in fostering educational success and closing the achievement gap?"
Purpose
The purpose of this action research is to evaluate the effectiveness of socioeconomic intervention programs and how they can improve the academic performance of low-income students. To analyze the effectiveness of the economic programs, we will employ various tactics, such as financial aid, mentoring programs, and resource allocation, as well as the multidimensional nature of academic results in this population. The primary aim is to determine significant factors that are associated with the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of these programs and explain how these dynamics shape the educational process of poor students (Snilstveit et al., 2015). The research is guided by the necessity to close the persistent achievement gap and educational outcome disparities. Schools and policymakers can develop evidence-based policies that aim to improve low-income students' situation, increasing their chances of academic success. In the final analysis, the research will produce useful knowledge to inform policies and programs that will promote equity in education and empower all students, irrespective of their socioeconomic background, to realize their academic potential.
Literature Review
A long-standing question about complex associations between socio-economic status (SES) and academic achievement has remained an area of concern for psychologists and educationists, i.e. it is the most researched matter. It is written by (Cross et al. 2018) that poverty generates very many hindrances that continue derailing the education process of the poor students, affecting their access to educational material such as textbooks, learning support and disabled technological instruments like electronic devices, which confuse them further. For instance, in (Hart's, 2019) perspective, the varying nature of settlements of low-income students, which encompasses bad weather or inadequate house arrangements, creates tension that puts education at the rear. According to Hart, it is hard and more important to specify the bottom lines of these issues in order to provide the understanding to use appropriate methods of interventions in response to them. He claims that it is the holistic setting of educational processes, which touches all dimensions of education, more than just opening classrooms and providing classes. The link between health, housing and education has to also be considered while making interventions.
According to (Hart 2019), the first solution is to provide and deal with the inequalities at the social-economic for the educational equality to be fulfilled. This vast information as of Hert to realize that the best interventions do not only solve the current problems but also the managing aspects of low-income student’s academic empowerment. On the other hand, the most effective technique is emphasizing on the degree, community defender advises that there is only one way of breaking the vicious cycle of inequalities and that providing and making a place where children learn with equal ability is what will do it. There is a wide range of advantages that stem from the implementation of lucrative and pressing projects that bring about the realization of educational excellence among students from impoverished backgrounds. Among such benefits are the inclusion of social support programs that champion the eradication of the multidimensional challenges such students face and which enable students to perform at par regardless of their socioeconomic background.
Findings point out that implementing interventions in early childhood stage is an essential factor in decreasing the economic burden as well as in stabilizing the academic achievements (McCoy et al., 2017) . Services such as Head Start are main contributors in the development of cognitive abilities, language skills, and school readiness of children from low social-economic backgrounds. (McCoy et al., 2017) demonstrate that trainees need enough time to impart knowledge administrated to them during their formative years which is quite essential and can play an important role in their intellectual development by filling the developmental gaps that may exist inhibiting the further academic successes. This fact represents an indication of the huge significance of the first years for the condition of a child when he/she is an adult. McCoy et al., (2017) discusses that establishing programmers that correspond to the specific requirements so as to stop the poverty cycles and provide the children an equal chance goals is vital. However, social welfare programs may not be able to relieve students’ economic hardship entirely. A support program created for these purposes could provide financial support to a student who needs a school supplies, technological access, or tutoring services. Financial aid can relate to the problem of l equality faced by the students because of the economic barriers among the non-financially favorable students, by providing them with a level playing ground where all students have the equal opportunities, like the financially stronger students.
React without a doubt; the level of parent’s engagement is the crucial basis of students marking. On the other hand, it is the case that (Berg, 2016) highlighted two major problems - time constraints and critical information channels are the low-income parents’ main disadvantages. Berg shows that children should be involved in programs that will help their parents who in turn are the role models of their children. The author is saying that it is crucial to develop and disseminate workshops on communication performance and education system navigation as they are the two things that will give families the required assistance and thus encourages a family-school collaborative attitude.
Offering free services to low-income youths with high sociol-economic status is an enlightened justice to the society. The statistics show clearly that a big change of a low-income student's life can be seen after attending an activity (Berg, 2016). For a more learner-friendly classroom, the author highlighted teacher assisting students individually, a targeted curriculum, or a smaller class size. More also, students can undergo into hands-on programs like after-school programs and summer enrichment whereby they acquire many skills. The opening of these opportunities to every young person regardless of their social circumstances the ones that Berg discusses help to create a really balanced playing field and it is the reason for building up a learning environment where each pupil can stay successful academically.
As a matter of fact, technology is factually required in each aspect of the educational process. The problem of the digital widening is the issue which is of the moment for those students with less social status the most. According to (Radovanović et al., 2015) lack of computer and internet is incompatible with gaining data and educational materials. The researchers also mention that they can adopt both social and economic direction, falling back on the provision of technological and digital literacy learning. Moreover, the institution could be funded by the program with technical resources like computers, which enables those from low-income communities to be liberated from the limits in terms of information and learning materials.
The educational programs that offer mentorship are increasingly becoming the common method of uplifting the students from low classes academically and also mentally. (Williams et al., 2019), enunciates that availing students with mentors who aid in giving counseling of encouragement and motivation, can be a pivotal aspect in the improvement of their self-esteem and desire to achieve more. Studies by (Williams et al., 2019), show that it is possible to design mentoring in the schools that have been serving large number of low-income families. Such at mentoring results in a sense of belonging, engagement and consequent academic progression of the students. Apart from the programs, students are provided with more than academic counseling; even as they get to their different future career shadows, they are free of worries. Therefore, the effect of the program has been positive, this is evident by students from low-income backgrounds were boosted confident and belonging among the students that played a crucial role in their academic success.
Furthermore, the importance of active participation of the community-based organizations with district-based resources in the process of socioeconomic policy is highlighted by (Rogers-Ard et al., 2019). According to (Rogers-Ard et al., 2019). Co-playing campaigns that are in collaboration with community fosters, libraries, and local firms will provide teenagers with more courses, mentorship packages, and leisure activities. The integrated framework of Rogers-Ard ensures that the true environmental circumstances of students who come from low-income families are examined and the local community is mobilized to create an environment to back up academic advancement. It also can be a great opportunity for students with minimal support to positively affect their own learning process through using available external resources and help in terms of decreasing educational inequality.
Methodology
For this action research, we will be using qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate how low-income students can improve their academic settings using a social support program in classroom settings. The methodologies will seek to analyze three key interventions, which include financial assistance, mentorship initiatives, and enrichment opportunities. Financial assistance will seek to analyze how low-income students are able to gain access to technological supplies in classroom setups, such as laptops, internet connectivity, and tutoring resources, amongst others (Jason et al., 2016).
Mentorship initiatives will focus on analyzing how low-income students are able to partner with members of the local community where they can be aided with guidance, academic support, and positive role modeling, contributing positively towards their academic success. Enrichment opportunities will include offering after-school programs with smaller classroom setups and individualized instructions with the aim of providing the students with a supportive and interactive learning environment.
Results
The first data collection method involved quantitative methodology. To use this methodology, we involved 700 students from low-income backgrounds and collected data from an institutional database that showcased their grades, test scores, and attendance. Based on a standardized test, they did with 500 points as the highest; 67 students were able to score a range of 450 - 350 points and above, 110 students were able to score 349 - 300 marks and above, 318 students were able to score 299 - 250 points and above. A total of 176 students scored a range of 249 – 200, and a total of 29 students scored a range of 199 – 100, with the lowest scoring 117 points on the test. This was in contrast to high-income students, where a similar score was achieved by 600 students, where 181 students scored 450 - 350 students, 374 students scored 349 – 300, 32 students scored 299 – 250 points, and 13 students scored 249 – 200 points. There is no student from a wealthy family who scored less than 200 points. Focusing on classroom attendance, only 216 low-income students could attend all classes. This is in contrast to students from high-income families, where 422 students were able to attend all classes while 178 students did not attend all the classes.
The second data collection method involved qualitative methodology, and it involved 512 students and teachers who were provided with both open-ended and closed-ended questionnaires, which addressed the challenges faced by low-income students in their education. Based on the information from the students, they had different on the impacts of emerging from low-income families and how I affected them academically (Neuendorf, 2018). Most of them suggested that it was hard to learn, especially when emerging from low-income, as they often lacked school fees to pay for their education. Since most of the students found it hard to pay for their education, it became hard for them to attend to their studies. The data collected from the participants was brought together and analyzed using both thematic and content analysis. By analyzing the data collected, we are able to gain a comprehensive overview of the impact of the program and the need for social support programs to help students from low-income backgrounds. The findings collected from the methodologies will offer valuable insight for teachers, researchers, and policymakers on the need to use support programs for low-income students and how they can address the achievement gap between low-income and high-income students.
Analysis
The quantitative methodology involved a total of 1,300 students, with 700 students coming from low-income backgrounds and 600 students coming from high-income. Students emerging from low-income backgrounds generally scored lower on standardized tests compared to their counterparts emerging from high-income backgrounds. This can be justified by a test of 300 points and above, with more students from high-income backgrounds. Focusing on students who scored 300 points and below, more students were portraying the higher achievement gaps. Focusing on the attendance records, a higher percentage of students from high-income backgrounds attended more classes than students from low backgrounds.
The qualitative methodology involved 512 students and teachers to provide insights into the challenges faced by students from low-income backgrounds. This methodology collected results using open and closed-ended questionnaires and surveys. After the data was collected, it was analyzed using thematic and content analysis tools (Neuendorf, 2018).
To address the principle studies query on how targeted socioeconomic interventions impact the academic overall performance of low-income students, we carried out six awesome motion research initiatives. The methodologies and key findings from every project are unique below.
Action Research Project 1: Financial Assistance Intervention
Methods: This venture applied a quantitative method. We provided three hundred low-income students with monetary help within the form of era sources (laptops, internet get entry to) and tutoring offerings. We accumulated information on their instructional overall performance (take a look at ratings, grades) and attendance quotes earlier than and after the intervention.
Results: The students who obtained the monetary help showed statistically enormous enhancements in their check rankings, with sixty five% scoring above 350 factors compared to best 25% previous to the intervention. Attendance prices additionally improved, with seventy eight% of the assisted students attending all instructions compared to 45% previously.
Analysis: The findings from this quantitative movement studies propose that supplying low-profits college students with direct economic help to access important instructional assets and offerings can have a superb effect on their academic performance and engagement. By assuaging financial barriers, these students were capable of dedicate extra time and strength to their research, main to advanced outcomes.
Action Research Project 2: Mentorship Program Intervention
Methods: This assignment utilized a blended methods technique. We paired two hundred low-profits college students with volunteer mentors from the local community. Quantitative information changed into amassed on the scholars' grades and attendance, while qualitative interviews were performed to recognize the students' reports and perceptions.
Results: The quantitative records confirmed that scholars collaborating inside the mentorship program had 15% higher grade point averages as compared to a control organization. Qualitative interviews discovered that the scholars felt extra supported, encouraged, and confident in their competencies because of the steerage and encouragement furnished by way of the mentors.
Analysis: The combined techniques approach allowed us to capture both the measurable instructional effect as well as the intangible social-emotional benefits of the mentorship program. By connecting low-profits students with nice role fashions and resources of support, this intervention seemed to foster a more feel of belonging and engagement, which translated to stepped forward academic overall performance.
Action Research Project 3: Enrichment Opportunities Intervention
Methods: This movement studies undertaking employed a qualitative technique. We presented 150 low-income students get admission to after-school applications with smaller magnificence sizes, individualized training, and hands-on getting to know activities. We collected records through cognizance businesses and open-ended surveys to understand the students' perceptions and reviews.
Results: Qualitative records analysis discovered that the scholars who participated in the enrichment opportunities felt greater influenced, engaged, and supported of their learning. They said feeling less beaten and more capable of ask questions and obtain personalized attention from teachers.
Analysis: The qualitative findings recommend that providing low-profits college students with get entry to superb educational enrichment packages can create a more supportive and interactive studying environment. By addressing factors like magnificence length and instructional approach, these interventions assist to stage the playing area and foster academic fulfillment for college students from deprived backgrounds.
Action Research Project 4: Community Collaboration Intervention
Methods: This mixed techniques movement studies venture worried participating with community-based organizations, nearby organizations, and district resources to provide a complete help application for 250 low-profits students. Quantitative statistics become gathered on academic performance and attendance, even as qualitative interviews had been performed with students, mother and father, and community partners.
Results: The quantitative records showed a 20% development in average test rankings and a 30% growth in elegance attendance fees for students participating inside the network-primarily based intervention application. Qualitative interviews highlighted the cost of imparting college students with get right of entry to mentorship, extracurricular activities, and additional getting to know materials via network partnerships.
Analysis: The findings from this blended methods look at underscore the significance of a holistic, network-pushed method to assisting low-income college students. By leveraging the assets and information of various local stakeholders, this intervention became capable of cope with the multifaceted wishes of the students, leading to measurable improvements in their instructional outcomes.
Action Research Project 5: Early Childhood Intervention
Methods: This quantitative movement studies assignment centered on implementing an early youth intervention program for 100 low-income preschool college students. We accumulated records on cognitive development, language capabilities, and college readiness earlier than and after the program.
Results: The consequences confirmed statistically large improvements inside the college students' cognitive capabilities, language development, and college readiness abilities after participating in the early childhood intervention software. Seventy five% of the students met or handed grade-level benchmarks as compared to best 35% previous to this system.
Analysis: The findings from this quantitative study emphasize the essential significance of early life interventions in laying a robust foundation for the future academic fulfillment of low-income college students. By addressing developmental gaps and improving school readiness, those packages can help wreck the cycle of educational inequality and higher prepare college students for lengthy-time period educational success.
Action Research Project 6: Parental Engagement Intervention
Methods: This blended techniques movement studies project centered on imposing a parental engagement program for one hundred eighty low-earnings families. Quantitative facts was accrued on pupil attendance and educational overall performance, while qualitative interviews were carried out with mother and father to apprehend their reviews and perceptions.
Results: The quantitative information confirmed a 12% increase in magnificence attendance and a 17% improvement in average test scores for college kids whose mother and father participated in the engagement application. Qualitative interviews discovered that mother and father felt more knowledgeable, empowered, and collaborative with the school, which undoubtedly motivated their children's academic consequences.
Analysis: The findings from this combined strategies take a look at underscore the importance of centered interventions that seek to interact and empower low-profits parents. By offering them with the sources, expertise, and equipment to navigate the educational system and guide their kid's learning, these applications can help cope with the barriers faced with the aid of this populace and foster stronger home-faculty partnerships, in the end contributing to advanced educational performance.
The findings from these six movement research projects offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of focused socioeconomic interventions in enhancing the instructional performance of low-income college students. The data suggests that a multifaceted technique addressing financial, social, academic, and community-based totally needs is most impactful in remaining the success hole. Policymakers and educators should take into account implementing evidence-primarily based interventions that are tailored to the unique challenges faced by way of this student populace.
Discussion
The quantitative approach analyzed data from a sample of 700 students who emerged from low-income socioeconomic groups, and it focused on measurements from standardized tests, scores, and attendance records. By comparing these statistics to students emerging from high-income socioeconomic groups, these students were seen to score lower in terms of scores and with higher rates of absenteeism. In the qualitative analysis study, surveys were conducted with 512 students and teachers, gathering information on the challenges faced by low-income students. Using open-ended questionnaires, students from these backgrounds shared their challenges and how coming from low-income socioeconomic groups affected their academic performance.
Students emerging from low socioeconomic groups suggested that they faced several constraints, which included a lack of financial data, access to learning materials, and social support, which made it hard for them to learn. Most of these constraints did not affect students from high-income socioeconomic backgrounds, which increased the achievement gap. From quantitative methodologies, we are able to get statistical evidence behind the achievement gap, while qualitative surveys provide us with insights experienced by low-income students, making it hard for them to study comfortably compared to the students emerging from high economic backgrounds (Jason et al., 2016). The data collected from these methodologies can be combined to facilitate targeted interventions, thus addressing challenges faced by low-income students and improving their academic outcomes.
Implications
There are several implications that can be employed to address the academic disparities faced by students from low-income backgrounds. These implications include;
Targeted interventions: Based on the findings from the research, targeted interventions are needed to improve academic performance for low-income students. By identifying the areas to be improved for each student individually based on student scores and absent rates, policymakers can be capable of tailoring interventions to students, thus addressing their challenges effectively.
Student support: The qualitative data demonstrates different challenges faced by students from low-income backgrounds, including lack of access to resources and financial constraints. Policymakers need to implement holistic support programs that will address not only the academic needs of the student but also socioeconomic impacts, allowing students to learn comfortably. This type of support should include financial aid and mentorship initiatives, thus supporting students throughout their academic journey.
Equality in education. The data from qualitative and quantitative methodologies shows there is a significant gap between students emerging from low and high-income backgrounds. Addressing this gap requires a commitment to fostering equality amongst all students, ensuring they have equal opportunities regardless of their socioeconomic group. Policymakers should prioritize using evidence-based policies to close the gap that exists in promoting academic inclusiveness regardless of students' socioeconomic background.
Continuous monitoring and evaluation: The data collected from the methodologies serves as an establishment and development for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of interventions aimed at supporting low-income students. After developing intervention strategies, they should be assessed regularly to enhance their effectiveness, allowing the stakeholders to make informed decisions on allocating the resources to meet the demands of low-income students.
What patterns did you see in the provided data? What additional actions could have been taken based on the provided data? What have you learned from analyzing the data?
By analyzing the data collected using different methodologies, several patterns emerge that connect academic experience and perceptions of low-income students. Compared to their higher-income counterparts.
From the quantitative methodology, there is a significant achievement gap where fewer students are scoring the highest ranges compared to the students emerging from rich-income families. Furthermore, there are more students from low-income families scoring 300 marks and below than students from higher-income families. By looking at the data collected from the attendance sheets, most of the high-income students are able to attend most of their classes without facing issues such as institution fees, making the low-income students have a higher absenteeism rate compared to the higher-income students.
The data collected using qualitative methodology gives valuable information on the reasons why there are these kinds of patterns based on the information that was collected. Most of the low-income students suggested that the main reason why they were not able to perform well was the lack of financial resources that made it hard for them to get resources that were required for studying purposes and the support required for them to excel in their academic journey (Neuendorf, 2018). Lack of access to the learning materials impacted them directly, making it hard for them to learn.
Based on the challenges that were encountered by the students, several actions would be taken to support the low-income students, thus boosting their performance. Some of the strategies that would be taken would be;
Providing them with financial aid would reduce the economic burdens encountered by their families, allowing them to attend their classes consistently.
Providing them with essential learning materials such as textbooks and technology would provide them with equitable access to educational resources, making them comfortable as they learn.
Offering educational enrichment activities to motivate them to engage in academic activities and smaller classes would create an engaging and supportive learning environment for them.
Implementing mentorship programs that would support students academically and act as a guide for their academic support.
Based on the data collected, students emerging from low-income backgrounds encounter multidimensional challenges, making it hard for them to excel in their academics, which is in contrast to students emerging from high-income backgrounds. For students facing diverse problems, there is a need for targeted interventions to be implemented, thus achieving equality for students emerging from diverse backgrounds (Berg, 2016). Developing a targeted intervention plan is likely to provide an effective plan that will help students based on their needs as it will include an effective plan on how students from low-income families will get equitable access to learning materials, access to learning institutions with as minimal fee as possible, engage their family members and foster supportive learning for the community, thus closing the persistent achievement gap that exists between students from low and high-income backgrounds.
Conclusion
Overcoming the academic gap of low-income pupils requires a holistic, multipronged response. This research proposes formulating area-specific economic programs, recognizing both socioeconomic status significance and school performance interdependence. The paper review stresses the importance of early childhood programs, parental engagement, access to high-quality educational services, technology, community programs, as well as the collaboration of communities. This study will be implemented through a participatory approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate change in academic performance in response to specific interventions. The target is to offer well-founded research so as to form the basis for the laws and programs that will create academic inclusiveness for all students.
References
Berg, G. A. (2016). Low-income students and the perpetuation of inequality: Higher education in America. Routledge.
Cross, J. R., Frazier, A. D., Kim, M., & Cross, T. L. (2018). A comparison of perceptions of barriers to academic success among high-ability students from high-and low-income groups: Exposing poverty of a different kind. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 111-129.
Hart, C. S. (2019). Education, inequality and social justice: A critical analysis applying the Sen-Bourdieu Analytical Framework. Policy Futures in Education, 17(5), 582-598
Jason, L., & Glenwick, D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Oxford university press.
McCoy, D. C., Yoshikawa, H., Ziol-Guest, K. M., Duncan, G. J., Schindler, H. S., Magnuson, K., ... & Shonkoff, J. P. (2017). Impacts of early childhood education on medium-and long-term educational outcomes. Educational researcher, 46(8), 474-487.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 211-223). Routledge.
Radovanović, D., Hogan, B., & Lalić, D. (2015). Overcoming digital divides in higher education: Digital literacy beyond Facebook. New media & society, 17(10), 1733-1749.
Rogers-Ard, R., Knaus, C., Bianco, M., Brandehoff, R., & Gist, C. D. (2019). The grow your own collective: A critical race movement to transform education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(1), 23-34.
Snilstveit, B., Stevenson, J., Phillips, D., Vojtkova, M., Gallagher, E., Schmidt, T., ... & Eyers, J. (2015). Interventions for improving learning outcomes and access to education in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. 3ie Systematic Review, 24.
Williams, J. M., Greenleaf, A. T., Barnes, E. F., & Scott, T. R. (2019). High-achieving, low-income students' perspectives of how schools can promote the academic achievement of students living in poverty. Improving Schools, 22(3), 224-236.
