Select a company on which you would like to do your company project on and submit your name and the company name here. by Feb 25th 2024.Two students cannot select the same the company. Students please
Company Analysis Report
Rubrics for grading
| Criteria | Excellent | Satisfactory | Not satisfactory | Student Grade |
| Submission of company name | The name of the company was submitted on time. Points allotted : 5 | The company name was submitted but it was late or was duplicated Points allotted : 2.5 | The name of the company was not submitted on time Points allotted : 0 | |
| Cover page | Cover page as per the sample all details including student name, course name, course id, college name Points allotted : 5 | Cover page as per the sample but some details are not in the cover page. Points allotted : 2.5 | No cover page or much of the cover page details are missing.
Points allotted : 0 | |
| Professional Appearance and Document Format (e.g. Appropriate Headers/subheadings, margins, table of contents, page numbers, spacing etc.) | Assigned format followed explicitly: Exceptional professional appearance. The headings, subheading, page numbers, line spacing were all exceptional. Points allotted : 10 | Formatting is generally correct, acceptable professional appearance. Points allotted : 5 | Not formatted to specifications Lacking professional appearance. Points allotted : 0 | |
| Presentation of company profile, vision, History & Timeline of the company | The company profile, mission vision and plan described in detail. Details of when the company was founded, their journey and their visions and mission given. Points allotted : 10 | The company profile, mission vision and plan described but not in detail. Some clarity is lacking. Points allotted : 5 | Little to no information or detail is provided on company profile, mission vision and plan described Points allotted : 0 | |
| Analysis of the Management and human resource team | The company’s CEO, management team and other HR team was discussed in detail. Points allotted : 10 | The company’s CEO, management team and other HR team was not discussed in detail. Lacking clarity and detail. Points allotted : 5 | The company’s CEO, management team and other HR team was not discussed in detail. Points allotted : 0 | |
| Analysis of the Product mix of the company | Description of the company’s product portfolio and product line & mix with various brands discussed in detail. Points allotted : 15 | Description of the company’s product portfolio and product line & mix with various brands mentioned but not in detail. More research required. Points allotted : 10 | Description of the company’s product portfolio and product line & mix with various brands not discussed Points allotted : 0 | |
| Analysis of organizations’ underlying financial performance and health by analyzing relevant financial statements, variances, ratios, and other financial information | Company’s financial statements, variances, ratios, and other financial information discussed in detail. The financial performance and strategy of the company was discussed in detail. Points allotted : 15 | Some aspects of financial performance and financial statements were discussed but incomplete. More research required. Points allotted : 10 | Financial performance and analysis of financial statement was missing. Points allotted : 0 | |
| Future plans and efforts of the organization | Company’s future, Plans and concepts for the future discussed in detail. Points allotted : 10 | Company’s future, Plans and concepts for the future discussed to some extent. Points allotted : 5 | Company’s future, Plans and concepts for the future was not discussed. Points allotted : 0 | |
| Analysis of company’s ethical and environmental strategies. | Company’s ethical, environmental and sustainable initiatives and their strategy was discussed in detail. Points allotted : 10 | Company’s environmental and sustainable initiatives and their strategy was mentioned but not discussed in detail or more research required. Points allotted : 5 | Company’s environmental and sustainable initiatives and their strategy was not mentioned and not discussed more research required. Points allotted : 0 | |
| References | Has a list of all references, properly referenced in APA style of referencing. Points allotted : 10 | All references have not been citied, The reference page is improperly referenced. APA style referencing not followed. Points allotted : 5 | No references page. All sources not properly citied or very little referencing. Points allotted : 0 |
