Hey there this is for my Philosophy class. I have attached some files down below such as an example of how the paper should be written and the articles that you should get the answers from. NO AI PLS.

Aspect of the Report

Critiquing Questions

Purpose

·       What was the study purpose?

Method

Research design and research tradition

·       Is the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?

·       Was an adequate amount of time spent in the field or with study participants?

·       Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design?

Sample and Sampling Methods

·       Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?

·       Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?

·       Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?

Data collection

·       Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?

·       Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations?

·       Was there a sufficient amount of data? Were they of sufficient depth and richness?

Procedures

·       Do data collection and recording procedures appear appropriate?

·       Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the people who collected data appropriately trained?

Enhancement of trustworthiness

·       Did the researchers use strategies to enhance the trustworthiness/integrity of the study, and were those strategies adequate?

·       Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

Data analysis

·       Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?

·       Did the analysis yield an appropriate “product” (e.g., a theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern, etc.)?

·       Did the analytic procedures suggest the possibility of biases?

Results/ Major

Findings

·       Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of excerpts and supporting arguments?

·       Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?

·       Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, authentic, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?

Conclusion/Summary assessment/Credibility

·       Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?

·       Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?