This is for Philosophy class. I have attached the files down below on how to do to write and I have also included articles. 5 pages for qualitative and 5 pages for quantitative.

Guide to a Focused Critique of Evidence Quality in a Qualitative Research Report

Aspect of the Report

Critiquing Questions

Purpose

·       What was the study purpose?

Method

Research design and research tradition

·       Is the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?

·       Was an adequate amount of time spent in the field or with study participants?

·       Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design?

Sample and Sampling Methods

·       Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?

·       Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?

·       Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?

Data collection

·       Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?

·       Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations?

·       Was there a sufficient amount of data? Were they of sufficient depth and richness?

Procedures

·       Do data collection and recording procedures appear appropriate?

·       Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the people who collected data appropriately trained?

Enhancement of trustworthiness

·       Did the researchers use strategies to enhance the trustworthiness/integrity of the study, and were those strategies adequate?

·       Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

Data analysis

·       Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?

·       Did the analysis yield an appropriate “product” (e.g., a theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern, etc.)?

·       Did the analytic procedures suggest the possibility of biases?

Results/ Major

Findings

·       Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of excerpts and supporting arguments?

·       Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?

·       Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, authentic, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?

Conclusion/Summary assessment/Credibility

·       Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?

·       Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?