See attachment

Discussion board # 1 Doctoral Research Study Journey

Please note that there are three posts needed to successfully complete the discussion board assignment. An initial post addressing the discussion board topic is due by end of day Saturday. Two response posts to at least one other student is due by end of day Tuesday.


Initial post: #1

  • Includes one substantive initial post using at least two scholarly or professional references with accompanying in-text citations to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material. 

  • your initial post should be at least 350 words. 

  • Includes an open-ended, thought-provoking question posed to classmates. 

 

A clearly defined problem is crucial to finding and implementing effective solutions. Considering the specific organizational problem that your doctoral study/dissertation could be based on, draft your problem statement. Start your statement with "The problem this study will examine/explore is…"


Part I: Explain the specific organizational problem addressed in your problem statement and discuss how an in-depth examination of this problem may help organizational decision-makers identify potential solutions. 

 

Part II: Using your chosen organizational problem, provide a potential purpose statement. Start your statement with "The purpose of this qualitative/quantitative research study is…"Discuss how this purpose statement aligns with your problem statement. 

Respond to post (AH)

Response posts

  • Includes at least two substantive responses that each include at least 1 scholarly, professional, or textbook reference with accompanying in-text-citation to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material. 

  • responses should be at least 200 words. 

Part I:

Addressing the Organizational Problem of Tokenizing Copper through Smart Contracts


My organizational problem focuses on the qualitative exploration of tokenizing copper through smart contracts to address liquidity, accessibility, and transparency issues in the copper market. This entails a comprehensive understanding of the theoretical and practical implications of tokenization and smart contracts, specifically in the context of the copper industry.


Understanding the Organizational Problem


The problem statement highlights the following key points:

1. Liquidity, Accessibility, and Transparency Issues: The copper market needs to address liquidity constraints, improve accessibility, and enhance transparency.

2. Gap in Understanding: There is a gap in understanding the theoretical and practical implications of tokenization and smart contracts, particularly in the copper industry.

3. Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives: The research aims to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders in the copper supply chain to gain insights into their views on the adoption of tokenization and smart contracts.

4. Assessing Ethical and Regulatory Challenges: The study aims to assess the ethical and regulatory challenges associated with tokenizing copper through smart contracts.

5. Proposing a Framework: The study ultimately proposes a framework for effectively integrating smart contracts in the copper market.


Importance of Examining the Problem


An in-depth examination of this problem is critical for the following reasons:

1. Identification of Potential Solutions: By understanding the challenges and opportunities associated with tokenizing copper through smart contracts, organizational decision-makers can identify potential solutions to enhance liquidity, accessibility, and transparency in the copper market.

2. Enhancing Market Efficiency: It can enhance the efficiency, transparency, and sustainability of the global copper market, which aligns with the industry's long-term goals and demands.

3. Stakeholder Engagement: Engaging key stakeholders in the exploration process can lead to developing relevant and acceptable solutions for all parties involved.

4. Promoting Innovation: By paving the way for innovations in the copper market, the study can contribute to advancing blockchain applications in non-financial sectors, thereby promoting technological innovation and progress.

 

Part II:


Potential Purpose Statement for the Research Study


The qualitative research study explores the implications of tokenizing copper through smart contracts for addressing liquidity, accessibility, and transparency issues in the copper market. It aims to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders in the copper supply chain, assess ethical and regulatory challenges, and propose a framework for the effective integration of smart contracts in the copper market.


Alignment with the Problem Statement


The purpose statement aligns with the problem statement in the following ways:

1. Addressing Key Issues: The purpose and problem statements emphasize the need to address liquidity, accessibility, and transparency issues in the copper market by exploring tokenization and smart contracts.

2. Stakeholder Perspectives: The purpose statement's focus on understanding the perspectives of key stakeholders aligns with the problem statement's emphasis on exploring stakeholders' attitudes in the copper supply chain.

3. Ethical and Regulatory Assessment: The purpose statement's intention to assess ethical and regulatory challenges aligns with the problem statement's aim to evaluate the ethical and regulatory implications of tokenizing copper through smart contracts.

4. Framework Proposal: Both statements converge on proposing a framework for effectively integrating smart contracts in the copper market.

 

References:

  • International Copper Association. (2020). "Copper Market Liquidity and Transparency: A Comprehensive Analysis.

  • Johnson, R. et al. (2019). "Smart Contracts and the Supply Chain: A Case Study in the Copper Industry." International Journal of Blockchain Research, 7(1), 102-118.

  • Smith, J. (2020). "Tokenization in the Commodity Market: A Comprehensive Study." Journal of Commodity Economics, 15(2), 45-62.



Discussion board # 2


Initial post:  #2

  • Includes one substantive initial post using at least two scholarly or professional references with accompanying in-text citations to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material. 

  • your initial post should be at least 350 words. 

  • Includes an open-ended, thought-provoking question posed to classmates. 


Choose two countries that you believe to be culturally diverse. Review and compare the cultures of those countries. How do you think the cultural differences might influence business practices with each country? Why?

Respond to post (AH)

Response posts: 

  • Includes at least two substantive responses that each include at least 1 scholarly, professional, or textbook reference with accompanying in-text-citation to support any paraphrased, summarized, or quoted material. 

  • responses should be at least 200 words. 

Canada and India are two countries known for their cultural diversity. Both have a rich tapestry of cultures, languages, and traditions shaped by their histories of immigration and colonization.


Canada

Canada has over 41 million people and is known for its multiculturalism. The Canadian government has policies in place to promote multiculturalism, recognizing the diversity of its people. Canada has two official languages, English and French, and is home to numerous Indigenous peoples with their languages and cultures. Additionally, Canada has a significant immigrant population from countries worldwide, including China, the Philippines, India, and the Caribbean, among others. This diversity is reflected in the country's food, festivals, and social norms.


India

India, with a population exceeding 1.2 billion, is one of the most culturally diverse countries in the world. It is a land of multiple religions, languages, and traditions. India has 22 officially recognized languages and thousands of dialects. The country is home to numerous ethnic groups, each with its customs and traditions. India's cultural diversity is reflected in its vast array of festivals, cuisines, and attire. The country's history of colonialism, particularly under the British, has also left a mark on its culture and language.


Comparison of Cultures

While both Canada and India are culturally diverse, the nature of their diversity is different. Canada's diversity is largely a result of immigration, with a relatively recent influx of people from various parts of the world. In contrast, India's diversity is deeply rooted in its ancient history, with many ethnic groups and cultures that have coexisted for millennia.


In Canada, cultural diversity is often celebrated in a more homogenized manner, emphasizing inclusivity and equality. In India, the diversity is more compartmentalized, with distinct cultural practices and often region-specific identities.


Influence on Business Practices

The cultural diversity of Canada and India can significantly influence business practices within these countries.


In Canada, businesses often need to be sensitive to the multicultural environment. This can include marketing strategies catering to various cultural groups, providing services in multiple languages, and being aware of cultural norms and holidays. Canadian businesses must also adhere to multiculturalism and inclusivity in hiring practices and workplace culture.

 

In India, businesses must navigate a complex web of cultural nuances. This can involve understanding regional preferences in advertising, being aware of numerous religious and cultural holidays that may affect business operations, and tailoring products and services to meet the population's diverse needs. For example, a company might need to offer a range of dietary options to accommodate the various religious practices and preferences of the Indian population.


Foreign companies must also be mindful of these cultural differences when doing business with these countries. For instance, a businessperson from a monocultural background may need to adapt their communication style and negotiation tactics to be more inclusive and sensitive to the diverse cultural contexts in Canada and India.


The cultural diversity of Canada and India is a defining characteristic that shapes their business environments. Understanding and respecting these cultural differences is crucial for any business looking to succeed in these markets. By recognizing and adapting to the multicultural landscapes of Canada and India, businesses can build stronger relationships with their diverse populations and achieve greater success in their operations.

 

References

 

  • Government of Canada. (n.d.). Canadian Multiculturalism. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/services/culture/canadian-identity-society/multiculturalism.html

  • Government of India Ministry of Culture. (n.d.). Population. Retrieved from www.indiaculture.gov.in%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbudget%2FOutcome%2520Budget%2F2015-2016%2FChapter-%2520I%2520(1-14).pdf

  • Statistics Canada. (n.d.). Population by mother tongue and age groups (total), 2016 counts for Canada, provinces, and territories. Retrieved from https:// https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240619/dq240619a-eng.htm