Please read the instructions
7/16/24, 6:22 PM
Project 3: Presentation to Management - CMIT 421 6981 Threat Management and Vulnerability Assessment (2245) - UMGC Learni…
Project 3: Presentation to Management
Course: CMIT 421 6981 Threat Management and Vulnerability Assessment (2245)
Evaluation Criteria 1.2.2: Employ a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal. | Exceeds Performance Requirements | Meets Performance Requirements | Approaches Performance Requirements | Does Not Meet Performance Requirements | Criterion Score |
14 points Employs a format, style, and tone completely appropriate to the audience, context, and goal. | 11.9 points Employs a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal. | 10.5 points Attempts to employ a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal, but there are gaps | 0 points Style employed is not appropriate to audience, context, or goal. | / 14 | |
1.3.3: Integrate appropriate credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas. | 14 points Integrates completely appropriate and highly credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas. | 11.9 points Integrates appropriate credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas. | 10.5 points Attempts to integrate sources to illustrate and validate ideas, but there are problems with source credibility or appropriateness, or the integration is choppy. | 0 points Does not integrate sources to illustrate and validate ideas. | / 14 |
2.1.3: Explain the significance of the issue or problem. | 15 points Explains the significance of the issue or problem succinctly and thoroughly. | 12.75 points Explains the significance of the issue or problem. | 11.25 points Attempts to explain the significance of the issue or problem, but the explanation is not clear or is not appropriate for the context | 0 points Does not explain the significance of the issue or problem. | / 15 |
12.3.2: Describe the implementation of controls. | 19 points Describes in an accurate and thorough manner how relevant IT controls are effectively implemented. | 16.15 points Describes the implementation of relevant IT controls. | 14.25 points Describes the implementation of IT controls, but the description lacks sufficient detail or accuracy. | 0 points Does not describe the implementation of IT relevant controls. | / 19 |
12.8.1: Recognize the process to obtain approval from the business process owner. | 19 points Makes strong recommendations with justification to management about purchasing systems to fit the company’s business needs. | 16.15 points Makes recommendations with justification to management about purchasing systems to fit the company’s business needs. | 14.25 points Makes recommendations but without justification to management about purchasing systems to fit the company’s business needs. | 0 points Does not make recommendations to management about purchasing systems to fit the company’s business needs. | / 19 |
Evaluation Criteria 13.2.1: Evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements | Exceeds Performance Requirements | Meets Performance Requirements | Approaches Performance Requirements | Does Not Meet Performance Requirements | Criterion Score |
19 points Evaluate and provides detailed justification for vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements. | 16.15 points Evaluates vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements. | 14.25 points Attempts to evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements, but some recommendations lack detail or do not consider context. | 0 points Does not evaluate vendor recommendations in the context of organization requirements. | / 19 |
Overall Score
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1647816&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1028917
2/2