This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. Collaborate with your group from Topic 2 to develop a presentation using your instructor-approved article on a specific intervention or new
CLC - Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Part 1
Group A11 (Clive Zifugo, Dickson Idemudia, Elias Waithanji, Pauline Mbuthia)
Grand Canyon University
Kenyon Morris
September 1st 2024
CLC Articles for Evidence based project
Article 1:
Citation:
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). Impact of a comprehensive diabetes education program on glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, 12, 173-184. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411808/
PICO(T) Question: In older adults with type 2 diabetes, does a comprehensive diabetes education program compared to standard care improve glycemic control?
PICO(T) Question Summary:
Population (P): Older adults with Type 2 diabetes
Intervention (I): Comprehensive diabetes education program
Comparison (C): Standard care
Outcome (O): Improvement in glycemic control
Timeframe (T): Not specified (Assumed to be over the course of the program duration as reported in the study)
Summary: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of a comprehensive diabetes education program on glycemic control in older adults with Type 2 diabetes. The findings indicate that those who participated in the comprehensive education program experienced significant improvements in glycemic control compared to those who received standard care. The study highlights the importance of structured education in managing Type 2 diabetes in the elderly population.
Article 2:
Citation:
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pediatric Diabetes, 23(2), 216-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13338
PICO(T) Question: In children with Type 1 Diabetes, does Continuous Glucose Monitoring compared to Traditional Glucose Monitoring improve glycemic control?
PICO(T) Question Summary:
Population (P): Children with Type 1 diabetes
Intervention (I): Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Comparison (C): Traditional blood glucose monitoring
Outcome (O): Improvement in glycemic control (measured by HbA1c levels)
Timeframe (T): 6 months
Summary: This meta-analysis examines the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control in children with Type 1 diabetes. The results indicate that CGM significantly improves HbA1c levels compared to traditional blood glucose monitoring. The findings support the adoption of CGM in pediatric diabetes care as it enhances glycemic control, potentially reducing the risk of long-term complications.
