Paper # 3 Outline Handout + Revamped Intro: Outline breakdown: APA: Make sure your paper follows APA guidelines. (Cover Page/ Abstract/ 5 pages/ References) Introduction: Breakdown of the issue with a

15

Unequal Access: The Ethics of Food Deserts in Low-Income Communities

Abstract

A food desert is a region where a minimal amount of affordable and healthy foods are available, and these regions are routinely located in low-income and African American neighborhoods. This paper looks at the issue of food deserts and its effect on the health of people, with special emphasis on the system factors involved. Synthesizing historical and current literature, the paper examines how planning practices, economic regulations and structures, and institutional mechanisms have produced these areas and perpetuated their marginalization. The empirical evidence posts a significant public health disparity about the effects of food deserts such as obesity, diabetes, and other diet-borne diseases. Additionally, the research reveals possible interventions involving interventions through community-based organizations, policymaking changes, and cooperation between the public and private sectors on preventing food deserts. Thus, the paper encompasses the arguments' responsiveness and a list of shortcomings to give a more comprehensive view of the challenges encountered in the context of food access. These results support action to abolish food deserts and suggest that there is an urgent need for comprehensive, contextually targeted interventions to address unfairness in food distribution.

Introduction

Regarding food deserts in the United States, it is crucial to discuss two aspects: on the one hand, it is the problem of American public health, on the other hand, it is the problem of American society being injustice to its people. Such places, commonly in predominantly African American and Latino neighborhoods, have limited access to healthy and inexpensive food, which means that locals have to buy calories in the form of candies and fast foods from local corner stores. This structural exclusion plays a role in a high prevalence of diet-induced diseases like obesity and type-2 diabetes among especially marginalized populations. All these health disparities make existing gaps wider bearing in mind they are a cycle of poverty and unhealthy living. The subject of the food deserts under consideration provokes very serious questions of ethical nature in terms of concerning basic human rights and proper treatment of citizens, since equal access to crucial products such as food, especially healthy products, is an indisputable condition for a decent life.

Successful policy interventions to provide access for those living in food deserts must consider historical, social, and economic contexts as determinants of food access. These areas are not random; however, they are products of several years of disinvestment, including redlining of underserved neighborhoods. These and many other evident food deserts highlight inadequacies in current solutions, underlining the need for multi-pronged approaches where policy changes, bottom-up initiatives, and public-private partnerships comprise the core elements of the food mapping effort. This paper explores the ethical implications of food deserts and evaluates strategies to address them, seeking to answer a critical question: What is the best way to reduce food accessibility gaps across people from rich and poor backgrounds?

Historical Context

Hunger disparity strongly connected to various sociopolitical contexts of the targeted city has a historical basis in urban design, economic regimes, and social injustice. The term that was coined in the early 1990s refers to the geographical areas that lack proper access to fresh and healthy food. But the idea in itself has a longer history than the term, which originated from conscious policies and changes in the economic system focusing on profit more than on equity. Reducing minorities, and low-income areas' access to credit, insurance, and other necessities were the outcomes of urban planning practices such as redlining. These decisions were consolidated by the act of retail redlining, where supermarkets and large grocery chains avoid outlets in low-income areas because they consider it a financial loss. It also excluded from getting healthy food and perpetuated poverty and health inequality as poor groups continued to pay the price.

Commonplace examples of food deserts show how policy and the economy have kept food access inequality a running theme. The developments in industrialization prompted grocery stores to continuously relocate to suburbs mainly because of other formal reasons such as easy access to roads and bigger space to expand, creating food deserts in urban low-income neighborhoods. Other policies like the provision of tax credits for suburbanization deepened the split by increasing the physical separation of high- and low-income districts. Beaulac et al. (2009) claim that such variations are not arbitrary but intentional since they reflect designed systems ensuring Social and Economic dualism and thus discrimination of vulnerable groups. The historical experience of the food deserts shows that food apartheid remains a present issue, which calls for more specific policy efforts to address it.

Statement of the Problem

Food deserts are still present, affecting millions of Americans living in impoverished communities with little to no access to supermarkets or stores that provide fresh fruits, vegetables, and healthy foods. This issue has relevance in the sphere of public health and the realm of social justice; a community lacking access to what it needs to eat is a community that suffers higher rates of so-called lifestyle diseases, which in turn lock populations into cycles of poverty and poor health. Scientific works consider modern inequalities in food availability, which show that disadvantaged and ethnic minorities have fewer opportunities to have access to healthy food products. Their studies reveal that these populations are served by stores and restaurants with minimal healthy foods, thus enhancing health hazards (Walker et al., 2010). This systemic lack of access has made the issue ethical because it has brought about a massive question mark about food insecurity's social and health impacts and whether society wants/needs to change its food policies.

Synthesis

Food deserts are a complex issue that originates from the past and persists today due to social and economic norms. According to Beaulac et al. (2009), there is no question that a food desert is not an accidental geographical phenomenon but founded upon intentional sustained shared neglect. In their study, they look at the ways both the policies that govern urban planning, including retail redlining as an economic move, Dinner & Creamer provide a glimpse as to how low-income and colored minorities have been pushed to the periphery. Lack of interest to invest by retailers in such locations resulted in an oversaturation of communities’ convenience stores and fast-food stores selling unhealthy calorie-dense foods. The authors argue this to be that an approach to the problem of food deserts can only be systemic, whereas individual interventions are not going to be sufficient to yield real change.

Walker et al. (2010) mainly concentrate on the specificity of the effects of food deserts on African Americans and other vulnerable populations through acute health effects. They explain how a lack of adequate supply of and access to wholesome foods accelerates obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The results of this work, therefore, reflect on such relations between public health and social justice hence; the ethical consideration for food deserts. The authors support grassroots approaches including urban gardening and food coops as they involve citizens in need of food in managing their needs. These programs disclose not only produce but also opportunities for economic improvement and social integration.

Based on these assumptions, Ver Ploeg et al. (2009) examine the dispersion of grocery stores and the access that supermarkets have to different population groups. They note that their study shows positive changes in urban centers but identifies several emerging issues in rural and poor specific areas. The present study finds flaws in geographical closeness to address the issue by identifying factors including cost, culture, and mobility. Ver Ploeg et al. stress that reforms mean improvements in infrastructure requiring policies addressing broader issues to complement the improvements.

Altogether, these papers provide a detailed understanding of food deserts as a structural problem predicated on race, history, and policy. This is a complex issue that needs to be solved through an integrated framework involving policies, infrastructure, and community development. These future research studies might focus on the possibilities of an appreciation of certain technological advancements in covering up the gaps for needy consumers, for instance, an online grocery delivery service and virtual shops among others. However, these solutions must be aligned with the principles of effective costs, information technology, and culture to include the lower-income population instead of reinforcing already existing inequalities. Society can use systemic reforms that incorporate community-based programs as well as make use of new tools to make changes that will be permanent and lead to equity, health, and social justice.

Arguments Supporting the Thesis: Addressing Food Deserts as an Ethical Imperative

1. Public Health Implications

A food desert is an area with poor access to fresh food and healthy food which can be very detrimental to the health of those living in the area. People living in such areas usually step out for meals from convenience stores and junk food joints, resulting in their diets being full of bad cholesterol and other vital nutrients. Such a diet is associated with increased prevalence of obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and other CHD (National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [NIMHD], 2023). Elimination of food deserts is an effective strategy for reducing the healthcare implications of ill health due to poor diet.

1. Prejudice and Discrimination Social and Economic

Food deserts are socially and economically unjust, essentially mirroring inequality. It hits low-income neighborhoods, racially diverse communities particularly, because of practices such as redlining and disinvestment that have been typical of society (Food Revolution Network, 2024). These areas are characterized by a higher incidence of poverty, unemployment, and low-quality education as well as health services resulting in a cycle of poverty. For example, the temperate food desert also often means the wage desert, in other words, where work is available it does not necessarily allow 'to make ends meet,' which creates a poverty cycle (Food Revolution Network, 2024). Reducing food deserts is inherent in the fight for social justice and a more just distribution of resources.

1. Ethical Responsibility and Social Justice

Every person has a right to quality meals at all times. The continuation of the large food desert points to the morally controversial issue of the social responsibilities of resourcing. According to the 'American Medical Association's Journal of Ethics, improving upon diets in food desert areas is a cultural, educational, and economic problem that is best solved through the kinds of community cooperation, plus clinicians remaining (Journal of Ethics, 2018). Combating food deserts can be justified with the principle of beneficence and justice since it is required to promote actions to counter societal injustice.

1. Economic Benefits of Intervention

It is possible to ensure potential economic returns when financing anti-starvation zones. Reliability and availability of good food means there will be fewer cases of diseases that are associated with bad foods thus lesser expenses on health. Also, practices such as the use of space and gardens in the cities, and the food coop movement for local foods offer employment opportunities for the citizens and boost local enterprises (Food Revolution Network, 2024). Hearths in the low-income population are ultimately sicker and, therefore, are a drain on the general population in terms of increased expenditure on health plus loss of productivity. Efforts to eliminate the problem of food deserts can have positive impacts on economic evolution as well as community enhancement.

1. Policy and Community Perspectives

Some of the most promising approaches for fighting the problem of food deserts are related to policies and local actions. Mobile supermarket policies that encourage supermarkets to open stores in food deserts, the subsidy for farmers' markets, and urban agriculture programs can increase healthy food accessibility (Food Revolution Network, 2024). This approach ensures that the solutions provided address the needs of the community and are both effective and reproducible. This paper showed that the problem of determining factors resulting in food deserts requires a more rounded strategy.

Counter-Argument: Reevaluating the Concept and Solutions of Food Deserts

The phrase ‘food desert’ has been used often when referring to places where there is a lack of easy access to healthy food; there are even policies to get more supermarkets in the ‘food desert’ areas. However, some concerns question the efficiency of this strategy and the identification of this concept.

1. Questioning the Efficacy of Supermarket-Centric Interventions

Recent research findings indicate that although the number of supermarkets has been established to be a good predictor of the number of stores selling healthy food products in low-income neighborhoods, increasing the number of these stores has little effect on the existing supermarket customers' diet or nutritional health. Most studies that were carried out by poverty scholars from New York University, Stanford University, and the University of Chicago show that the gap in diet quality depends more on income levels, education, and knowledge among households and not on the distance that they can access stores selling foods.

1. Critiques of the "Food Desert" Terminology

Some researchers have raised objections to the term 'food desert' because it tends to provide simplistic interpretations of problems and may fuel prejudice against populations. Caroline George, a research assistant at the Brookings Institution's Metropolitan Policy Program acknowledges that while the term aligns the extended conceit of redlining, segregation, and structural racism to the food system, it runs the risk of erasing existing community resources and strengths from the spatiality it draws (Allcott et al., 2019).

1. The Role of Personal Preferences and Economic Constraints

Another criticism is based on the fact that people from different backgrounds make their own choices of meals depending on their preferences and pocket' ¦lack of access to food stores is not the only determinant but only a limited influence. For each food desert zip code in a given city, the survey revealed that, on average, 87% of groceries come from supermarkets; hence, access is not the issue (George, 2020). This research also showed that households with a high income will pay more prices for the healthier while the households with low income paid more prices for the less healthy food.

1. Historical Context and Policy Implications

The problem of food deserts started relatively recently in the 1980s, with such policy measures as an abandonment of the Robinson-Patman Act. Through this change, the large retail chain firms managed to control the market and forced many small grocery stores including those in the low-income and rural areas to close. Some measures that the state and federal Department of Agriculture tried to combat food deserts are developing incentive policies for supermarkets to enter and open new outlets in these food deserts but these attempts have been relatively futile.

1. Advocating for a Holistic Approach

Opponents state that hunger alleviation ought to be treated locally as a broader problem than the theory of the ‘food deserts. This includes issues like levels of income, education, cultural inclinations, and subordinate positions. This means that by restricting its emphasis on geographic access, the policies of a country may not solve the root causes behind poor diets and bad health.

Counter: Disproving the Counter-Argument

The critics' main assertion is that geographic access to grocery stores does not dramatically reduce dietary outcomes problems, however, the studies point out that physical access to healthy foods is the core starting point in broad diet and health enhancements. Studies by the US Department of Agriculture reveal that people in low-access areas eat less fruits and vegetables because these are not available and the study affirms the need to bring supermarkets to low-access areas. Further, while individual tastes and cost considerations are sufficient to make eating decisions, they are not removable from the food apartheid caused by food swamps. If a fast food joint is the only accessible store from a grocery store, people have no chance to make healthy food choices irrespective of desire or information. The critique of stigmatization of the term ‘food desert’ is important but does not negate the usefulness of the concept in pinpointing the areas of deficiencies. Measures aimed at food deserts, along with endeavors to increase the accessibility and cultural appropriateness of the food can serve as a basis for clear strategies for change.

Conclusion

This paper seeks to discuss the ethical considerations of food deserts and why such a situation requires immediate attention from regulatory policymakers. The articles show that food inequality results from historical oppressions, tricky economic structures, and present structured prejudices. It is necessary to assume that there is a social obligation to give every person an equal chance to consume healthy foods, eliminating those disparities. This research shows the best policies for the short-term and those for the future, such as subsidizing producers of fresh food products in areas of low income and supporting community activities. Future research could examine how these proposed solutions impact health outcomes over time, guiding further ethical approaches to public health and social justice.

References

Allcott, H., Diamond, R., & Dubé, J.-P. (2019). The effect of food deserts on nutritional inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(4), 1793–1844. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz013

Beaulac, J., Kristjansson, E., & Cummins, S. (2009). Peer reviewed: A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007. Preventing chronic disease, 6(3).

Food Revolution Network. (2024). Food deserts: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Retrieved from https://foodrevolution.org/blog/food-deserts-food-oasis-healthy-food-access/

George, C. (2020). Beyond food deserts: Examining systemic barriers and community resilience. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/beyond-food-deserts/

Journal of Ethics, American Medical Association. (2018). How should physicians counsel patients who live in food deserts? Retrieved from https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/how-should-physicians-counsel-patients-who-live-food-deserts/2018-10

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD). (2023). Food accessibility, insecurity, and health outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/resources/understanding-health-disparities/food-accessibility-insecurity-and-health-outcomes.html

The Atlantic. (2024). The great grocery squeeze. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/food-deserts-robinson-patman/680765/

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2016). Recent evidence on the effects of food store access on food choice and diet quality. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/may/recent-evidence-on-the-effects-of-food-store-access-on-food-choice-and-diet-quality/

Ver Ploeg, M., Breneman, V., Dutko, P., Williams, R., Snyder, S., Dicken, C., & Kaufman, P. (2012). Access to affordable and nutritious food: Updated estimates of distance to supermarkets using 2010 data.

Walker, R. E., Keane, C. R., & Burke, J. G. (2010). Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature. Health & place, 16(5), 876-884.