Islam and Christianity have interacted for many years. They are two of the most prominent religions in the world and are probably the two that you are most familiar with. They both have their own holy

Accurately discusses the time period and location. Provides a clear and concise short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences ). Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. Presents the historical context of the primary source as well as the time period and location. Provides a short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences). Minimal errors/information largely correct. Mostly clear and concise. Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. The historical context, time period, and location are given, but could be discussed in more detail. The minimum of 4 –5 sentences may not be reached and/or there are 2 or more large mistakes. The wording may not always be clear or concise. May not cite the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner - Hanks to help formulate answer. The historical context, time period, and location are mostly incorrect. Less than 3 sentences are provided. The wording is not clear or concise. No citations are provi ded. Very brief or incorrect information given and/or no information is provided. The wording is extremely difficult to understand. Only 1 to 2 sentence s are given and/or incomplete thoughts are provided. And/or contains plagiarism/use of AI, like ChatGPT. Intended Audience Effectively answers who the intended audience was and how it affected the subject matter.

Provides a clear and Answers who the intended audience was and how it affected the subject matter. Provides a short paragraph (a The intended audience and how it affected the subject matter are given, but could be discussed in more The intended audience and how it affected the subject matter are mostly incorrect. Less than 3 sentences are provided.

The wording is not clear Very brief or incorrect information given and/or no information is provided. The wording is extremely difficult to understand. Only 1 to 2 sentence s are given and/or concise short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences ). Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. minimum of 4 –5 sentences). Minimal errors/information largely correct.

Mostly clear and concise. Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. detail. The minimum of 4 –5 sentences may not be reached and/or there are 2 or more large mistakes. The wording may not always be clear or concise. May not cite the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner - Hanks to help formulate answer. or concise. No citations are provi ded. incomplete thoughts are provided. And/or contains plagiarism/use of AI, like ChatGPT. P oint of View Effectively gives the point of view of the author and discusses what information gets hidden or obscured by the author’s POV . Provides a clear and concise short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences ). Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. Gives the point of view of the author and discusses what information gets hidden or obscured by the author’s POV. Provides a short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences). Minimal errors/information largely correct.

Mostly clear and concise. Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate The point of view of the author and the information that gets hidden or obscured by the author’s POV are given, but could be discussed in more detail. The minimum of 4 –5 sentences may not be reached and/or there are 2 or more large mistakes. The wording may not always be clear or concise. May not cite the secondary The point of view of the author and the information that gets hidden or obscured by the author’s POV are mostly incorrect. Less than 3 sentences are provided. The wording is not clear or concise. No citations are provi ded. Very brief or incorrect information given and/or no information is provided. The wording is extremely difficult to understand. Only 1 to 2 sentence s are given and/or incomplete thoughts are provided. And/or contains plagiarism/use of AI, like ChatGPT. answer. sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner - Hanks to help formulate answer. P urpose Effectively discusses why the primary source was created and w hat the author was trying to convince the audience of. Provides a clear and concise short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences ). Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. Discusses why the primary source was created and w hat the author was trying to convince the audience of. Provides a short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences). Minimal errors/information largely correct.

Mostly clear and concise. Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. Why the primary source was created and w hat the author was trying to convince the audience of are given, but could be discussed in more detail. The minimum of 4 –5 sentences may not be reached and/or there are 2 or more large mistakes. The wording may not always be clear or concise. May not cite the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner - Hanks to help formulate answer. Why the primary source was created and w hat the author was trying to convince the audience of are mostly incorrect. Less than 3 sentences are provided. The wording is not clear or concise. No citations are provi ded. Very brief or incorrect information given and/or no information is provided. The wording is extremely difficult to understand. Only 1 to 2 sentence s are given and/or incomplete thoughts are provided. And/or contains plagiarism/use of AI, like ChatGPT. O utside Informatio n Effectively provides and cites specific examples of outside information that come to mind when the Provides and cites specific examples of outside information that come to mind when the primary Examples of outside information that come to mind when the primary The o utside information that comes to mind when the primary source is stud ied is limited or overly general . How the Very brief and/or no information is provided. The wording is extremely difficult to understand. Only 1 to 2 sentence s are given and/or primary source is stud ied as well as how the information could be use d in a paper . Provides a clear and concise short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences ). Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner -Hanks to help formulate answer. source is stud ied as well as h ow the information could be use d in a paper . Provides a short paragraph (a minimum of 4 –5 sentences). Mostly clear and concise. Cite s the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner - Hanks to help formulate answer. source is stud ied as well as h ow the information could be use d in a paper are given but not cited and could be discussed in more detail . The minimum of 4 –5 sentences may not be reached. The wording may not always be clear or concise. May not cite the secondary sources in Reilly and/ or Wiesner - Hanks to help formulate answer. information could be use d in a paper is not discussed in detail. Less than 3 sentences are provided.

The wording is not clear or concise. No citations are provi ded. incomplete thoughts are provided. And/or contains plagiarism/use of AI, like ChatGPT.