Pageof 3ZoomBUSI 830 Page 1 of 3 BIBLICAL, ETHICAL RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW In this assignment, you will research Biblical, ethical research. Establishing a firm ethical foundation ba

Criteria Ratings Points Abstract, Introduction 10 to >9 pts Advanced Abstract clearly states the purpose and main conclusion and Introduction provides a complete overview of the discussion. 9 to >8 pts Proficient Abstract and Introduction provides a partial purpose, main points, and overview of the discussion 8 to >0 pts Developing Abstract and Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion 0 pts Not Present Not completed. 10 pts The Foundation of Biblical Ethics 16 to >14 pts Advanced A complete discussion of the foundation of Biblical ethics is present.

Flow is logical. 14 to >13 pts Proficient A partial discussion of the foundation of Biblical ethics is present. Flow is mostly logical. 13 to >0 pts Developing A discussion of the foundation of Biblical ethics is significantly lacking. Flow is not logical. 0 pts Not Present Not completed or not related to requirements for the section. 16 pts Demonstrating Biblical Ethics in Research 16 to >14 pts Advanced A complete discussion of how Biblical ethics is demonstrated in research is present.

Flow is logical. 14 to >13 pts Proficient A partial discussion of how Biblical ethics is demonstrated in research is present.

Flow is mostly logical. 13 to >0 pts Developing A discussion of how Biblical ethics is demonstrated in research is insufficient. Flow is not logical. 0 pts Not Present Not completed or not related to requirements for the section. 16 pts Mitigating Researcher Bias Using Biblical Principles 16 to >14 pts Advanced A complete discussion of mitigating researcher bias using Biblical principles is present.

Flow is logical. 14 to >13 pts Proficient A partial discussion of mitigating researcher bias using Biblical principles is present.

Flow is mostly logical. 13 to >0 pts Developing There is minimal discussion of mitigating researcher bias using Biblical principles. Flow is not logical. 0 pts Not Present Not completed or not related to requirements for the section. 16 pts Accurate Representation of the Literature 16 to >14 pts Advanced A complete discussion of accurately representing the literature is present.

Flow is logical. 14 to >13 pts Proficient A partial discussion of accurately representing the literature is present.

Flow is mostly logical. 13 to >0 pts Developing There is minimal discussion of accurately representing the literature. Flow is not logical. 0 pts Not Present Not completed or not related to requirements for the section. 16 pts Biblical, Ethical Research Assignment Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Sharing the Gospel through Character 18 to >16 pts Advanced A thorough discussion of how to share the Gospel through character in a research study is present. Flow is logical. 16 to >15 pts Proficient A partial discussion of how to share the Gospel through character in a research study is present. Flow is mostly logical. 15 to >0 pts Developing The discussion of how to share the Gospel through character in a research study is insufficient. Flow is not logical. 0 pts Not Present Not completed or not related to requirements for the section. 18 pts Conclusion 10 to >9 pts Advanced A complete summary of the discussion with highlights of key points is present. No new information and/or personal opinions are present. 9 to >8 pts Proficient A partial summary of the discussion with highlights of key points is present. Some new information and/or personal opinions are present. 8 to >0 pts Developing A summary is present but does not contain highlights of key points.

Mostly new information and/or personal opinions are present. 0 pts Not Present Not completed. 10 pts APA Format and Structure, References, and Citations, Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, Composition 23 to >21 pts Advanced APA formatting and structure are followed, all references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed.

guidelines, and all assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct. 21 to >18 pts Proficient APA formatting and structure are mostly followed, most references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and most assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Minor errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition. 18 to >0 pts Developing APA formatting and structure are not followed, most references and citations do not correspond to each other and/or are not formatted according to APA 7th ed.

guidelines, and most assertions are not supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition. 0 pts Not Present There are many errors in mechanics, composition, grammar. 23 pts Biblical, Ethical Research Assignment Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Sources/ Word Count 20 to >18 pts Advanced Nine or more peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. There are nine integrations of Biblical integration with five Scripture citations. The book sources provided are course texts or the Bible only. Word Count is thorough (1600-2400 words). 18 to >16 pts Proficient Eight to six peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. There are six to eight integrations of Biblical integration with three to four Scripture.

Books other than course texts and the Bible are used as sources. Word Count is satisfactory (+/- 4%). 16 to >0 pts Developing One to five peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided.

There are one to five integrations of Biblical integration with five Scriptures.

Books other than course texts or the Bible are used as sources.

Non-peer-reviewed sources are provided.

Word Count is insufficient (>+/- 4%, <+/-10%). 0 pts Not Present No peer-reviewed sources are provided, or Word Count is insufficient +/-10% or greater). 20 pts Total Points: 145 Biblical, Ethical Research Assignment Grading Rubric