The topic is ( Improving access and/or quality of dental insurance) .1.Prepare a 7-minute presentation for the class in PowerPoint based on your final paper. Since you'll still be working on your pape

Identification of Health Services Challenge or Controversy

8–10 points

The paper clearly identifies a health services challenge or controversy in the US, and explains its importance using peer-reviewed sources.

6–7 points

The paper clearly identifies a health services challenge or controversy in the US.

4–5 points

The paper is not sufficiently focused on a single health services challenge or controversy in the US.

0–3 points

The paper fails to identify any health services challenge or controversy in the US as its focus.

Score of Identification of Health Services Challenge or Controversy,

/ 10

Clear position on how to address challenge or controversy

8–10 points

The paper takes a clear position on how to address the challenge or controversy based on deliberate review of peer-reviewed historical or other relevant evidence.

6–7 points

The paper takes a clear position on ways to address the challenge or controversy.

4–5 points

The paper is not sufficiently clear on ways to address the challenge or controversy.

0–3 points

The paper fails to take any position on how to address the challenge or controversy.

Score of Clear position on how to address challenge or controversy,

/ 10

Subject Matter Expertise

31–40 points

The paper reflects a comprehensive understanding of the problem and draws upon historical evidence, contemporary evidence, and content from our class to support its assertions. It includes 10 data sources, at least 5 of which are peer-reviewed.

21–30 points

The paper reflects a general understanding of the problem and draws upon evidence or course content to support its assertions. It includes 10 data sources, several of which are peer-reviewed.

11–20 points

The paper reflects misunderstandings, relies on incomplete evidence, or misses important course content that supports its assertions. Lack of required sources interferes with the ability to draw convincing conclusions.

0–10 points

The paper reflects major misunderstandings insufficient research to understand its topic, or is missing sources necessary to understand the topic.

Score of Subject Matter Expertise,

/ 40

Writing and organization

16–20 points

Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. Paper is organized in a clear and logical way.

11–15 points

Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few (1-2) minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. Structure of paper is logical overall but might be occasionally hard to follow.

6–10 points

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness. Minor problems with sentence structure, some grammatical errors, and/or several (more than 3) minor errors in punctuation and spelling. Structure of paper is less than clear. 

0–5 points

Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. Major problems with sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling (more than 5 errors). Structure of paper is haphazard and difficult to follow.

Score of Writing and organization,

/ 20

Formatting and Academic Integrity

16–20 points

The paper follows formatting instructions. It documents all sources using APA formatting accurately and consistently. No issues flagged by plagiarism software and no evidence that the use of AI interfered with the author’s critical thinking.

11–15 points

The paper follows formatting instructions. It documents most sources using APA formatting accurately and consistently (with 1-2 errors.) No issues flagged by plagiarism software and no evidence that AI interfered with the author’s critical thinking.

6–10 points

The paper follows some but not all formatting instructions. The paper relies on inappropriate evidence (e.g. not peer-reviewed). It reflects incomplete knowledge of APA formatting (3 or more errors). Issues are flagged by plagiarism software, or there is evidence that AI interfered with the author’s critical thinking.

0–5 points

The paper does not follow any formatting instructions (5-7 pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-pt font, submitted in Word). It does not rely on appropriate sources and uses little to no correct APA formatting (formatting is not APA but may be in another style). Issues are flagged by plagiarism software, or there is evidence that AI interfered with critical thinking.