CIS 312 Assignment 2: Network Design

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 110	Assignment 2: Network Design
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Suggest the equipment that you would utilize to design and implement a network, based on the scenario. Justify the need for your suggestions. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletelysuggested the equipment that you would utilize to design and implement a network, based on the scenario. Did not submit or incompletely justified the need for your suggestions.	Insufficiently suggested the equipment that you would utilize to design and implement a network, based on the scenario. Insufficiently justified the need for your suggestions.	Partially suggested the equipment that you would utilize to design and implement a network, based on the scenario. Partially justified the need for your suggestions.	Satisfactorily suggested the equipment that you would utilize to design and implement a network, based on the scenario. Satisfactorily justified the need for your suggestions.	Thoroughly suggested the equipment that you would utilize to design and implement a network, based on the scenario. Thoroughly justified the need for your suggestions.
2. Recommend the strategy that you would use to combat the design challenge of occupying non-adjacent floors. Suggest a solution that includes the cabling / connecting of the two (2) differing office space floors. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletelyrecommended the strategy that you would use to combat the design challenge of occupying non-adjacent floors. Did not submit or incompletelysuggested a solution that includes the cabling / connecting of the two (2) differing office space floors.	Insufficiently recommended the strategy that you would use to combat the design challenge of occupying non-adjacent floors. Insufficiently suggested a solution that includes the cabling / connecting of the two (2) differing office space floors.	Partially recommended the strategy that you would use to combat the design challenge of occupying non-adjacent floors. Partially suggested a solution that includes the cabling / connecting of the two (2) differing office space floors.	Satisfactorily recommended the strategy that you would use to combat the design challenge of occupying non-adjacent floors. Satisfactorily suggested a solution that includes the cabling / connecting of the two (2) differing office space floors.	Thoroughly recommended the strategy that you would use to combat the design challenge of occupying non-adjacent floors. Thoroughly suggested a solution that includes the cabling / connecting of the two (2) differing office space floors.
3. Determine the primary security concerns regarding the scenario in question. Explain the controls you would implement in order to lessen those concerns. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletelydetermined the primary security concerns regarding the scenario in question. Did not submit or incompletelyexplained the controls you would implement in order to lessen those concerns.	Insufficiently determined the primary security concerns regarding the scenario in question. Insufficiently explained the controls you would implement in order to lessen those concerns.	Partially determined the primary security concerns regarding the scenario in question. Partially explained the controls you would implement in order to lessen those concerns.	Satisfactorily determined the primary security concerns regarding the scenario in question. Satisfactorily explained the controls you would implement in order to lessen those concerns.	Thoroughly determined the primary security concerns regarding the scenario in question. Thoroughly explained the controls you would implement in order to lessen those concerns.
4. Detail the specifics of your network design through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely detailed the specifics of your network design through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Insufficiently detailed the specifics of your network design through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Partially detailed the specifics of your network design through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Satisfactorily detailed the specifics of your network design through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Thoroughly detailed the specifics of your network design through the use of graphical tools in Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.
5. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present