Prosecutors sometimes choose not to charge or prosecute criminal cases for several reasons. Provide at least five examples and explain why prosecutors decide not to charge or prosecute criminal cases.

Because we have to list our textbook as a reference in all short essay questions, I looked up some of the reasons prosecutors choose not to charge or prosecute criminal cases. Please use the reasons listed here but I will need you to provide more information along with the reasons.Please provide at least 200 words, written in APA format with in-text citations, and references---this is very important or I will get a zero. No plagiarism--it will be checked--I can get throwed out of my class for that!

The five examples that needs to be used are: The first reason is their belief that an offense did not cause sufficient harm, The second reason involves the relationship between the statutory punishment and the offender or the offense, The third reason for not prosecuting, even when the three ideal conditions are met, is an improper motive on the part of a complainant. A fourth reason, prosecutors sometimes choose not to prosecute a case is that particular law has been violated with impunity for a long time with few complaints by the public, A fifth reason prosecutors often choose not to prosecute a case, even though, ideally, prosecution is required, is that a victim may refuse to testify.

These are 5 reasons listed out of the 9 in the book and I listed the examples word for word so if it can be reworded to mean the same thing then that may be done because we are only allowed to use 20% of the material coming from a direct-citation, she wants them to be written more in our own words.