for michael smith only
Ethical Theories Comparison Chart
Utilitarianism | Ethical Egoism | Ethics of Care | Kantianism | Prima Facie Duties | Divine Command Theory | Virtue Theory | |
How is “good” Determined | Good is determined by consequences | Good is determined by self-interests | Good is determined by the interpersonal care, as the virtue of morals | Good is not determined by actions but consequences | Good is based on the prime duty | Good is determined by the Divine Command | Individual characters led to consequences |
Most Noted Philosopher(s) | Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill | Thomas Hobbes | Carol Gilligan and philosopher Nel Noddings | Immanuel Kant | W. D. Ross's | Thomas Aquinas, Robert Adams, and Philip Quinn. | Plato and Socrates |
Major Strengths | It provides answers to the question “what ought man to do” | The theory impacts self-confidence and reliability in decision making | The theory helps one to engage in self-examination and determine moral virtues | A persons actions determine his/her moral worth | It guides one to develop moral obligation for his actions | Good is based on faith and beliefs | The theory provide ethical grounds for moral thinking |
Major Weaknesses | The theory does not explain the certainty of trust and self-confidence. | According to critics, the theory involves a slave morality and a lot of ambiguity. | The theory create indifferences in others opinions in regard to morality | Not all good actions led to good consequences | The theory fails to elaborate on the cause of action due to incomplete duties | The feasibility of good depends on faith and thus invisible. | It is difficult to establish the nature of virtues depending on their culture and societies. |