8 SLIDES DUE IN 15HRS


NSG 3028 Week 5 Assignment 2 Grading Rubric


Assignment Components

Unsatisfactory

1

Emerging

2

Proficient

3

Exemplary

4

Score

Analyzed and provided relevant

information pertaining to all parts of the project.

Failed to analyze and

provide relevant information pertaining to all parts of the project, giving a clear understanding.

Analyzed and provided

Some relevant information pertaining to parts of the project but information was incomplete.

Accurately analyzed

and provided relevant information pertaining to most parts of the

project but needs more detail.

Thoroughly analyzed and

provided relevant information pertaining to all parts of the project in detail.

__x 10= 40

Described key findings and identified four issues related to the chosen

population.

Vaguely described 1 key finding and lack cohesion of relating issue for chosen

population.

Described 2 key findings and identified 2 issues

related to the chosen population but information

was vague.

Described key findings and identified 3

issues related to the chosen population but

needs more detail.

Thoroughly described key findings and accurately

identified four issues related to the chosen

population.

__x 5= 20

Analyzed and suggested implications

(4 risk factors) for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings.

Vaguely discussed implications for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings.

Discussed

implications for

community health nursing related to local, national,

and global settings but information was

vague.

Analyzed and

suggested implications for community health nursing related to

local, national, and global settings but needs more detail.

Analyzed and suggested

Implications (4 risk factors) for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings throughly.

__x 5= 20

Analyzed and suggested two areas of research based on weekly readings

and lectures.

Provided a vague suggestion about areas

of research not based on weekly readings and

lectures.

Provided a suggestion about one area of

research based on weekly readings and lectures; however lacked

detailed information.

Examined and suggested two areas

of research based on weekly readings and

lectures but needs

more detail.

Thoroughly analyzed and suggested two areas of

research based on weekly readings and lectures in

detail.

__ x 5= 20


Used bullet points instead of complete

sentences and followed the 7×7 rule— no more than seven lines on the slide in no more than seven words on a

line.

Used complete sentences and did not follow the 7×7 rule.

Used bullet points instead

of complete sentences, but did not follow the 7×7 rule.

Used bullet points

instead of complete sentences and followed the 7×7 rule but missed some details in doing so.

Used bullet points

instead of complete sentences and followed the 7×7 rule, taking care not to miss any detail.

__ x5 = 20

Included tables, graphs, and other

forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation.

Failed to included tables,

graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation.

Included very few tables,

graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation.

Included necessary

tables, graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation but needs more detail

Included tables, graphs,

and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation with all required details.

__ x5 = 20

Provided well-documented research bibliography

for chosen community.

Research limited to websites or non peer reviewed articles for

identified community.

Documented 1 research article for chosen community with vague relevant information.

Provided 2 to 3 peer reviewed research articles for chosen community but lacked summary of information in project.

Provided four or more detailed research articles for chosen community population (peer reviewed articles from SUO).

__ x 5=20

Written components Speaker notes.

Introduction is limited or

missing entirely.

Poorly organized document.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

No attempt at APA

formatting.

Introduction is present but

incomplete or underdeveloped.

Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension.

Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but

incomplete or underdeveloped.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that somewhat interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Introduction has a

clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but few errors are present.

Introduction catches the

reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic.

Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.

Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout

that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for.

__ x 10 = 40

Total

__of 200

Page 1 of 3

NSG3028 Caring for the Community

© 2013 South University