8 SLIDES DUE IN 15HRS
NSG 3028 Week 5 Assignment 2 Grading Rubric
Assignment Components | Unsatisfactory 1 | Emerging 2 | Proficient 3 | Exemplary 4 | Score |
Analyzed and provided relevant information pertaining to all parts of the project. | Failed to analyze and provide relevant information pertaining to all parts of the project, giving a clear understanding. | Analyzed and provided Some relevant information pertaining to parts of the project but information was incomplete. | Accurately analyzed and provided relevant information pertaining to most parts of the project but needs more detail. | Thoroughly analyzed and provided relevant information pertaining to all parts of the project in detail. | __x 10= 40 |
Described key findings and identified four issues related to the chosen population. | Vaguely described 1 key finding and lack cohesion of relating issue for chosen population. | Described 2 key findings and identified 2 issues related to the chosen population but information was vague. | Described key findings and identified 3 issues related to the chosen population but needs more detail. | Thoroughly described key findings and accurately identified four issues related to the chosen population. | __x 5= 20 |
Analyzed and suggested implications (4 risk factors) for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings. | Vaguely discussed implications for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings. | Discussed implications for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings but information was vague. | Analyzed and suggested implications for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings but needs more detail. | Analyzed and suggested Implications (4 risk factors) for community health nursing related to local, national, and global settings throughly. | __x 5= 20 |
Analyzed and suggested two areas of research based on weekly readings and lectures. | Provided a vague suggestion about areas of research not based on weekly readings and lectures. | Provided a suggestion about one area of research based on weekly readings and lectures; however lacked detailed information. | Examined and suggested two areas of research based on weekly readings and lectures but needs more detail. | Thoroughly analyzed and suggested two areas of research based on weekly readings and lectures in detail. | __ x 5= 20 |
Used bullet points instead of complete sentences and followed the 7×7 rule— no more than seven lines on the slide in no more than seven words on a line. | Used complete sentences and did not follow the 7×7 rule. | Used bullet points instead of complete sentences, but did not follow the 7×7 rule. | Used bullet points instead of complete sentences and followed the 7×7 rule but missed some details in doing so. | Used bullet points instead of complete sentences and followed the 7×7 rule, taking care not to miss any detail. | __ x5 = 20 |
Included tables, graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation. | Failed to included tables, graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation. | Included very few tables, graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation. | Included necessary tables, graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation but needs more detail | Included tables, graphs, and other forms of diagrammatic representation to reinforce the presentation with all required details. | __ x5 = 20 |
Provided well-documented research bibliography for chosen community. | Research limited to websites or non peer reviewed articles for identified community. | Documented 1 research article for chosen community with vague relevant information. | Provided 2 to 3 peer reviewed research articles for chosen community but lacked summary of information in project. | Provided four or more detailed research articles for chosen community population (peer reviewed articles from SUO). | __ x 5=20 |
Written components Speaker notes. | Introduction is limited or missing entirely. Poorly organized document. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. No attempt at APA formatting. | Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped. Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that somewhat interfere with readability or comprehension. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. | Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but few errors are present. | Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic. Well organized document with an appropriate introduction. Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for. | __ x 10 = 40 |
Total | __of 200 |
Page 1 of 3
NSG3028 Caring for the Community
© 2013 South University