Submit a draft of the legal and ethical considerations (Section II) for your final project, including all critical elements as listed in the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric document. In this section, you will compare and contrast ethical concerns rela

PSY 624 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric : Draft of Legal and Ethical Considerations In Milestone Two, you will utilize information that you researched and read for Milestone One. For this milestone, you should focus on the critical elements provided in this document and concisely integrate these elements into your draft. This will incorporate the Supreme Court and federal laws that you hav e examined and discussed in the course thus far. Prompt: Submit a draft of the legal and ethical considerations (S ection II) , including all critical elements as listed below . In this section, you will compare and contrast ethical concerns related to the treatment of each of the target populations. Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: II. Legal and Ethical Considerations a) Compare and contrast ethical concerns related to the treatment of each of the target populations. For example, what ethical concerns do psychologists face in treating each of the target populations within the constraints of the legal system? Are there special considerations in addressing victims versus those who are incarcerated, or violent versus non -violent offenders? Are there certain ethical principles that apply to all three populations? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples and guidelines from a professional psychology organization. b) Discuss how the specific ethical guidelines of a professional psychology organization may have informed the treatment strategies for each of the three populations. Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples. c) Compare and contrast federal laws related to the treatment of each of the target populations. How do these laws inform or constrain care options? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific example s. d) Assess the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on the development and implementation of treatment programs for each of the target populations. How do these cases inform or constrain care options? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific example s. 1. Non -violent offenders 2. Violent offenders 3. Trauma victims Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your draft of the legal and ethical considerations (Section II) must be submitted as a three - to four -page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12 -poin t T imes New Roman font, one -inch margins, and sources cited in APA format. Instructor Feedback : This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more in formation, review these instructions . Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement ( 75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Legal and Ethical Considerations: Ethica l Accurately compares and contrasts federal laws related to the treatment of each of the target populations and substantiates claims with specific examples Compares and contrasts federal laws related to the treatment of the target populations, but with ga ps in accuracy or detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples Does not compare and contrast federal laws 15 Legal and Ethical Considerations: Ethical Guidelines Comprehensively discusses specific ethical guidelines of a professional psychology organization that may have informed the treatment strategies for each population and substantiates claims with specific examples Discusses ethical guidelines that may have informed treatment strategies, but guidelines are not associated with a pro fessional psychology organization, or discussion lacks detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples Does not discuss ethical guidelines that may have informed treatment strategies 15 Legal and Ethical Considerations: Federal Laws Accura tely compares and contrasts federal laws related to the treatment of each of the target populations and substantiates claims with specific examples Compares and contrasts federal laws related to the treatment of the target populations, but with gaps in acc uracy or detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples Does not compare and contrast federal laws 15 Supreme Court Cases: Non -V iolent Accurately assesses the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on treatment programs for non -violent offend ers and substantiates claims with specific examples Assesses the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on treatment programs for non -violent offenders, but with gaps in accuracy or detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples Does not assess the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases 15 Supreme Court Cases: V iolent Accurately assesses the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on treatment programs for violent offenders and substantiates claims with specific examples Assesses the impact of U.S. Sup reme Court cases on treatment programs for violent offenders, but with gaps in accuracy or detail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples Does not assess the impact of U.S.

Supreme Court cases 15 Supreme Court Cases: V ictims Accurately as sesses the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on treatment programs for trauma victims and substantiates claims with specific examples Assesses the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on treatment programs for trauma victims, but with gaps in accuracy or de tail, or does not substantiate claims with specific examples Does not assess the impact of U.S.

Supreme Court cases 15 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent und erstanding of ideas 10 Earned Total 100%