Review the collateral information of Case Scenario 5. In the Assessment Data section, review the raw data of the CAPI. Appropriately interpret the scores. Based on your review of Therapeutic Risk Typologies, provide a recommendations report for child prot

PSY 622 Milestone Five : Case Scenario 5 Guidelines and Rubric (Child Abuse Potential ) Prompt: Review the collateral information of Case Scenari o 5. In the Assessment Data section , review the raw data of the CAPI. Appropriately interpret the sco res. Based on your review of Therap eutic Risk Typologies , provide a one to two page recommendations report for child protective services . Specifically , the following critical elements must be addressed: V. Child Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 5) a) Assess the extent to which th e case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with re gard to the scientific method? b) Evaluate th e interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research. c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research. d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research. e) Be sure your rec ommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of th e organization of your choice. Guidelines for Submission: The recommendations report should follow these formatting guidelines: 1 –2 pages , double spacing, 12 -point T imes New Roman font, one -inch margins, and at least three citations in APA format. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integ rated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructi ons . Critical Elements Proficient (100% ) Needs Improvement (75 %) Not Evident (0% ) Value Child Abuse Potential : Daubert Comprehensively assesses the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard Assesses the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard but with gaps in accuracy or detail Does not assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard 18 Child Abuse Potential : Interview Information Evaluates interview information appropria tely for its implications in the risk assessment process and substantiates claims with specific research Evaluates information but evaluation is not appropriate to the situation, or does not substantiate claims with research Does not evaluate interview inf ormation 18 Child Abuse Potential : Collateral Information Evaluates collateral information appropriately for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process and substantiates claims with specific research Evaluates collateral informati on but evaluation is not appropriate to the situation, or does not substantiate claims with research Does not evaluate collateral information 18 Child Abuse Potential : Recommendations Proposes appropriate recommendations and justifies with research Propos es recommendations that are not appropriate to the situation, or does not justify with research Does not propose recommendations 18 Child Abuse Potential : Ethical Guidelines Employs appropriate ethical guidelines of a professional organization in making recommendations Employs ethical guidelines but guidelines are not appropriate to the situation or are not supported by a professional organization Does not employ ethical guidelines 18 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to cit ations, grammar, spelling , or syntax Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling , or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling , or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Earned Total 100%