IRIS STUDY

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Points

Earned

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Case Study Level A, Case 1 - Sam 30 pts

Specific Praise Summary & Rationale

9 to 10 points

Summary and rationale were included, accurate, and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the student’s needs.

7 to 8 points

Summary and rationale were included but lacked sufficient details or contained inaccuracies.

0 to 6 points

Summary and/or rationale were omitted.

Criterion-Specific Rewards Summary & Rationale

9 to 10 points

Summary and rationale were included, accurate, and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the student’s needs.

7 to 8 points

Summary and rationale were included but lacked sufficient details or contained inaccuracies.

0 to 6 points

Summary and/or rationale were omitted.

Choice-Making Summary & Rationale

9 to 10 points

Summary and rationale were included, accurate, and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the student’s needs.

7 to 8 points

Summary and rationale were included but lacked sufficient details or contained inaccuracies.

0 to 6 points

Summary and/or rationale were omitted.

Case Study Level A, Case 2 - Heather 30 points

Effective Rules Summary & Rationale

9 to 10 points

Summary and rationale were included, accurate, and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the student’s needs.

7 to 8 points

Summary and rationale were included but lacked sufficient details or contained inaccuracies.

0 to 6 points

Summary and/or rationale were omitted.

Contingent Instructions Summary & Rationale

9 to 10 points

Summary and rationale were included, accurate, and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the student’s needs.

7 to 8 points

Summary and rationale were included but lacked sufficient details or contained inaccuracies.

0 to 6 points

Summary and/or rationale were omitted.

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Points

Earned

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Case Study Level A, Case 2 - Heather 30 points

Group Contingency Summary & Rationale

9 to 10 points

Summary and rationale were included, accurate, and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the student’s needs.

7 to 8 points

Summary and rationale were included but lacked sufficient details or contained inaccuracies.

0 to 6 points

Summary and/or rationale were omitted.

Case Study Level B, Case 1 - Doug 30 points

Strategy Rationale

14 to 15 points

Selected strategy is appropriate to meet the needs of the student and is supported by detailed rationale for the section.

12 to 13 points

Selected strategy is appropriate to meet the needs of the student but the rationale for the selection lacks sufficient details.

0 to 11 points

Selected strategy and/or rationale were omitted.

Implementation Plan

14 to 15 points

A comprehensive implementation plan is included and includes cautions for use.

12 to 13 points

An implementation plan is included but lacks sufficient details and/or cautions for use.

0 to 11 points

An implementation plan is not included.

Case Study Level B, Case 2 - Ellie 30 points

Strategy Rationale

14 to 15 points

Selected strategy is appropriate to meet the needs of the student and is supported by detailed rationale for the section.

12 to 13 points

Selected strategy is appropriate to meet the needs of the student but the rationale for the selection lacks sufficient details.

0 to 11 points

Selected strategy and/or rationale were omitted.

Implementation Plan

14 to 15 points

A comprehensive implementation plan is included and includes cautions for use.

12 to 13 points

An implementation plan is included but lacks sufficient details and/or cautions for use.

0 to 11 points

An implementation plan is not included.

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Points

Earned

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Mechanics and APA Formatting – 5 points

Mechanics & Current APA Formatting

5 to 5 points

A current APA-formatted title page, reference page are included, corresponding heading and subheadings are included and professional, positive language is used.

4 to 4 points

Errors in mechanics and formatting were noted (1–3).

0 to 3 points

Errors in mechanics and current APA formatting were noted (4 or more).

Total

Instructor’s Comments: