For essays Guru

Assignment Components

Proficiency

Maximum Score

Ethical debate of forensic mental health professional’s role in interrogations.

Debate clearly and accurately presents both sides’ positions. Both sides are treated fairly, explained completely, and presented with sound reasoning. Opinion and sentiment are absent from this section of the paper.

60

Stance and argument on forensic mental health professional’s role in interrogation.

A clear stance for one side is presented and accurately justified. Argument presents specific examples and material from text and/or course, which demonstrates proper understanding and application of material. Argument refutes the alternate stance.

60

Stance and argument on ability to assist in battlefield interrogation scenario.

Argument regarding assistance in battlefield interrogation clearly presents a single stance and is grounded in ethical reasoning and battlefield realism. Argument addresses the sense of urgency of the situation, the heightened affective response, and the possible negative consequences. Argument uses specific evidence from the text and/or course material, which demonstrates proper understanding and application of material. Argument refutes the alternate stance.

60

Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Include citations in text and at the end of the document in the correct APA format.

Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few and isolated and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension.
Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.

20

Total:

200