ECE 430 week 2 discussion 1 (Due in 5 hours) Do not ask to change the price.

Discussion 1

Veronica Brooks 

3/13/2017 8:49:45 PM

Dear Mrs. Ford,

 

I received word that you would like for me to write you a letter about the curriculum that I have chosen to use in my classroom.   After reading Week 2 Case Study of Mrs. Ashland’s, I have had an opportunity to review what is going on with the students Jane, Caleb, Johnny, Maya and Jake.  From my review, I have realized that each of the children are very independent and have their own creative style about themselves.  I have chosen the best model for the children would be the Creative Curriculum.

Little Johnny has had an opportunity, to read one of Mrs. Ashland’s book and I believe since he if found his interest in reading, he will expand on that by sharing different and interesting stories with his class.   Maya, has difficulty with the language barrier, but she is very motivated when it comes to cutting, jumping and running.  Jane, is a very bubbly and enthusiastic child that enjoys jump rope.  Jane is also on an Individualized Education Plan (IEP), this plan keeps her on track for improvement on her motor skills. 

All of the children have special interests and enjoy being creative within the areas of activity that they play in.   The children began kind of to themselves but as time goes on, they began to interact with one another.  This curriculum is suited for this classroom because it will concentrate on their developmental and growth skills.

Respond

wk2d1_jackson

Amanda Jackson 

3/15/2017 12:17:48 PM

Dear Mrs. Ford,  

 
Thank you for choosing me to write a letter about recommending a planned curriculum to use within the classroom. I feel that the project learning approach is the best curriculum to use, and will meet the needs of Johnny, Maya, Jane, Caleb, Kayla, and Jack. "Perhaps the most child-centered of the first three models of curriculum design, project learning emerges from children's stated interests, or interests the teacher observes but that may be unconscious or undeveloped in the children" (Krogh, 2013, p. 3.3). Projects helps make "differentiated instruction" for each child easier. "Projects grow naturally from units and themes" (Krogh, 2013, p. 3.3). We could take a virtual tour at a zoo, and that could lead to in-depth projects on different animals from the zoo, and teaming the children above together on one of the animals they share an interest in. Having the children work together will help encourage each other. Placing one child that excels in an area that another child may need help in. Children can learn from their peers, and that helps build self-confidence in the children. A good example would be putting Johnny that excels in vocabulary with Maya that sometime struggles with putting sentences together. Each child can bring something to the table to help the other children with. "Project learning allows for individual and group work, team planning and collaboration, and in-depth study according to children's interest" (Krogh, 2013, p. 3.3). Using the project learning approach will make "differentiated instruction" much easier in the classroom, and will help ensure each child's needs are met in the classroom.   

 
Thank You,  

 
Mrs. Ashland  

  

References  

Krogh, S. (2013).  A bridge to the classroom and early care: ECE capstone. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.  

Respond


(an instructor response)

RE: wk2d1_jackson

Instructor DeBiase 

3/16/2017 10:39:36 AM

Amanda and Class,

You have great accommodations listed here Amanda! One common mistake that I see educators make is not including specific accommodations and modifications for students to meet individual needs.  In the lesson planning stages, a teacher needs to identify all activities within the lesson, think of potential barriers or missed opportunities for specific students given these activities and then determine needed accommodations/modifications so that ALL students have the opportunity to master the content being taught. 
On a scale of 1-5, how much experience have you had with differentiation and identifying accommodations for students (1 being no experience and 5 being a lot of experience)? 

Respond

Case Study Analysis

Kimberly Garee 

3/15/2017 12:35:30 PM

I will be using a single subject approach with integration of cross-curricular skills through a project approach for curriculum planning that will allow the lessons to address the needs of the individuals in my class while building a strong foundation in core subjects. “Systematic planning of a single subject ensures specific knowledge and skills will not be lost” while the project approach provides opportunities for differentiation and incorporation of the children’s interests (Krogh & Groark, 2013, Approaches to Curriculum Development, para. 2). Project learning also “allows for individual and group work” as well as “team planning and collaboration” (Krogh & Groark, 2013, Approaches to Curriculum Development, para. 12). By initially focusing on a single subject “with integration taking place later,” the students will be given the benefits of both the single subject approach and an integrated curriculum (Krogh & Groark, 2013, Approaches to Curriculum Development, para. 3).

This integration could be accomplished through the use of class projects based on the interests and needs of the children in the class, including skills and subjects across the curriculum. Noting that several of the children in the class need some help in developing their social skills and fine motor skills, these would be two areas of focus for development through integration and the project approach. Johnny and Caleb could use some practice in fine motor skills, and Jane has an IEP with goals for improving her fine motor skills. On the other hand, Maya, Kayla, and Jack are at or beyond the expected development in their fine motor skills. Therefore, I would pair students who are strong in their fine motor skills with students who are weaker in this area to work on a project together for peer-to-peer modeling of these skills. Also, this project would allow for socialization in small and large groups, at which time students such as Johnny, Maya, Kayla, and Jack, who struggle in certain areas socially could work in groups that include some of the students with stronger social skills such as Jane and Caleb. In addition, the students who need some support in language development like Jane whose IEP includes language goals and Maya who is an ESL student could be given opportunities to learn new words and ways of communicating through dramatic play and emphasis on vocabulary during the single subject focus of the lessons.

For example, when planning a lesson focused on reading comprehension, using the book “The Very Hungry Caterpillar,” prior to reading the book as a group with the class, we would review and post vocabulary words with pictorial descriptions as well as listing the words in Maya’s first language in order to assist Maya and Jane with their language development. We would also develop a plan for presenting a play based on this book, and the students would be paired as noted above to decorate the props needed for the play, utilizing their fine motor skills in cutting and pasting tissue paper onto the cutouts that will be used in the play while also integrating art and dramatic play into the lesson plan. We would continue to read this book and review the vocabulary words as a group as we practice for the final play and prepare the props. There would be plenty of time for discussion in the large group reading time as well as socialization in pairs and small groups as we work on the props and the presentation of the play, which will also provide opportunities for working on social skills, communication, and language development. While the main focus of this lesson is reading comprehension through the understanding of the sequence, setting, characters, and storyline, we will also be integrating social skills, fine motor skills, and language development through the integration of a project into this lesson, which will address the specific developmental needs of the children in the class and reinforce the learning in the core component of reading comprehension.

The single subject approach with integration allows for the building of a strong base in the components of the core subject area while also providing opportunities to address the specific needs of the individual students in the development of skills and knowledge across the board.

References:

Krogh, S. L., & Groark, C. J. (2013). A bridge to the classroom and early care: A capstone. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUECE430.13.1

Kim

Respond


(an instructor response)

RE: Case Study Analysis

Instructor DeBiase 

3/16/2017 10:25:35 AM

Kim and Class,

Learner centered/individualized approaches do take into account student interests and work to meet the needs of students.   The opposite of learner centered is teacher directed or direct instruction, in which the teacher plans lessons "to the middle" and walks students through the learning of a new targeted standard or skill, models it, practices it and then assesses it.  How would a teacher structure such an approach so that it doesn't turn in to a bunch of activities with little direction or objectives?

ECE 430 week 2 discussion 1 (Due in 5 hours) Do not ask to change the price. 1

Respond