Psychology paper

Efﬁcacy of a prevention program for postpartum obsessive ecompulsive symptoms Kiara R. Timpano a,*, Jonathan S. Abramowitz b, Brittain L. Mahaffey b, Melissa A. Mitchell c, Norman B. Schmidt c aUniversity of Miami, FL, United StatesbUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United StatescFlorida State University, FL, United States article info Article history:

Received 19 April 2011 Received in revised form 21 June 2011 Accepted 22 June 2011 Keywords:

OCD Postpartum CBT Prevention abstract Obsessive eCompulsive Disorder (OCD) has emerged as a common and impairing postpartum condition.

Prospective studies have identi ﬁed psychological vulnerabilities for the emergence of postpartum obsessive ecompulsive symptoms (OCS), including general anxiety symptoms, pre-existing OCS, and speci ﬁc cognitive distortions. The identi ﬁcation of these factors makes feasible the development of prevention programs that could reduce the impact of postpartum OCS. The present investigation examined a cognitive-behavioral prevention program using a randomized, double blind, controlled trial.

Expecting mothers in their 2nd or 3rd trimester with an empirically established, malleable risk factor for postpartum OCS received either the prevention program (N ¼38) or a credible control program (N ¼33), both of which were incorporated into traditional childbirth education classes. Results revealed that at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum, the prevention program was associated with signi ﬁcantly lower levels of obsessions and compulsions than was the control condition (all p’s < 0.05). Group differences remained signiﬁ cant even after controlling for baseline OCS and depression symptoms. Those in the prevention condition also reported decreasing levels of cognitive distortions, in contrast to the control condition ( p’s < 0.05). Results support the potential utility of incorporating a CBT-based OCS prevention program into childbirth education classes. 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Although much research has focused on maternal depression during the perinatal (pregnancy and the ﬁrst postpartum year) period ( Godfrey, 2005; Logsdon et al., 2006; Robertson et al., 2004 ), our understanding of perinatal anxiety disorders is still in the nascent stages. This is unfortunate given that anxiety disorders as a group are the most prevalent of all psychiatric conditions ( Kessler et al., 2005), and perinatal maternal anxiety in particular is associated with a number of adverse maternal and developmental repercussions including: over-activation of the maternal endocrine system, low birth weight ( Lou et al., 1994; Mulder et al., 2002 ), postpartum depression ( Ahmad et al., 1994; Sutter-Dallay et al., 2004 ), reduced communication with the infant ( Field et al., 2005), behavioral inhi- bition, and insecure mother einfant attachment ( Coplan et al., 2005; Manassis et al., 1995 ). These adverse consequences, considered along with the high prevalence of perinatal maternal anxiety problems ( Heron et al., 2004 ), attest to the need for developing and testing effective prevention and treatment programs.

Obsessive ecompulsive disorder (OCD) is among the most common postpartum anxiety disorders ( Abramowitz et al., 2003b; Ross and McLean, 2006 ), and as such, is a desirable target for prevention or treatment. OCD occurs in approximately 2% of the general population ( American Psychiatric Association, 1994 ) and has been identi ﬁed as one of the top ten leading causes of disability world-wide ( Dupont, 1993; Lopez and Murray, 1998 ). Although much less is known about OCD during the perinatal period, there is a growing consensus among researchers and clinicians that post- partum obsessivee compulsive symptoms (OCS) represent a serious problem that is under-identi ﬁed, with many women not receiving needed services ( Forray et al., 2010 ). Research to-date has revealed that OCS frequently occur during the perinatal period and can range in severity from mild to extremely impairing ( Abramowitz et al., 2003a; Zambaldi et al., 2009 ). In addition, both pregnancy and childbirth have been found to trigger onset of OCD or exacerbation of OCS ( Abramowitz et al., 2003b; Forray et al., 2010 ). Up to 40% and * Corresponding author. University of Miami, Department of Psychology, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States. E-mail address: [email protected] (K.R. Timpano). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Psychiatric Research journal homepage: www.elsevi er.com/locate/psychires 0022-3956/$esee front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.06.015 Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 30% of females with OCD report symptom onset during the peri- natal period (Williams and Koran, 1997 ) and the postpartum ( Buttolph and Hollander, 1990; Labad et al., 2005 ), respectively. A recent study in a small sample of women at 1 month postpartum found that 31% reported subclinical OCS ( Chaudron and Nirodi, 2010 ). Relatively little empirical work has focused on the down- stream consequences of OCS for both the parent and child; however, in addition to causing the mother extreme distress, postpartum OCS can also in ﬂuence the type of care an infant receives, family relationships and interactions, as well as increase the risk for developing further psychiatric disorders such as depression ( Abramowitz et al., 2003b ).

Given these data, there is a need to substantially reduce the personal, developmental and ﬁnancial impact of OCD, particularly if vulnerable females can be identi ﬁed during pregnancy and if an effective OCD prevention program can be developed and imple- mented. Longitudinal studies have identi ﬁed antenatal factors that prospectively predict increases in postpartum OCS, including (a) higher levels of anxiety, (b) higher levels of pre-existing (non- clinical) OCS, and (c) the presence of certain cognitive distortions (e.g., the belief that “bad ”thoughts are equivalent to bad actions) ( Abramowitz et al., 2003a, 2006 ). These variables represent iden- ti ﬁable psychological vulnerabilities to perinatal OCD and raise the possibility that at-risk individuals can be identi ﬁed. The identi ﬁ- cation of potentially malleable vulnerability factors is necessary for the development of a prevention program ( Kraemer et al., 2001) that could in turn demonstrably reduce the impact of postpartum OCD and OCS. Cognitive-behavioral models of OCD ( Salkovskis et al., 1998) and postpartum OCS ( Fairbrother and Abramowitz, 2007 ) posit that symptoms arise when normally occurring, negative intrusive thoughts (e.g., unwanted thoughts of harm befalling the infant) are misinterpreted as highly signi ﬁcant and threatening based on faulty beliefs about the importance of such thoughts (e.g., “If I think this, it is likely to happen ”) and the need to control them (e.g., “I should never have any bad thoughts about the infant) ( Larsen et al., 2006).

Compulsive rituals (e.g., checking on the infant) subsequently develop with the function of reducing anxiety and controlling the unwanted thoughts, but instead maintain the obsessional fear by preventing the natural extinction of obsessional anxiety. Research indicates that about 70% of postpartum women report unwanted infant-related intrusive thoughts ( Abramowitz et al., 2003a), and two prospective studies found that the presence of antenatal dysfunctional beliefs predicts more severe obsessions and compulsions in the postpartum, over and above depression, general anxiety, and pre-existing OCS ( Abramowitz et al., 2006, 2007).

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is one efﬁ cacious treatment for OCD, and includes techniques such as exposure, response prevention, and cognitive therapy ( Foa et al., 1998). CBT is thought to work by correcting cognitive distortions and weakening urges to perform anxiety-reducing rituals ( McLean et al., 2001). The knowledge of empirically supported interventions for reducing both symptoms and vulnerabilities, in combination with the identi ﬁcation of malleable risk factors, presents the opportunity for considering targeted prevention programs ( Feldner et al., 2004).

The aim of the present investigation was to develop and test the ef ﬁcacy of a prevention program based on CBT principles for postpartum OCS. Speci ﬁcally, expecting mothers with an empiri- cally established, malleable risk factor for postpartum OCS dobsessive beliefs dreceived either a CBT prevention program or a credible control program, both of which were incorporated into traditional childbirth education classes. We hypothesized that compared to the control condition, the prevention program would be associated with lower OCS and lower scores on obsessive beliefs (e.g., importance of thoughts and the need to control them) at one month postpartum. We also hypothesized that symptom reduction would be maintained in the prevention condition across 6 months postpartum, and that these ﬁndings would be speci ﬁc to OCS by statistically controlling for baseline depression symptoms.

2. Methods 2.1. Participants The sample consisted of 71 expecting mothers who were fol- lowed from their 2nd or 3rd trimester of pregnancy into the post- partum at two sites: Florida State University in Tallahassee, FL (FSU n ¼ 33) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC n ¼ 38). Participants were recruited from local OB/Gyn clinics, as well as print and online advertisements in the respective communities. In total, 306 women were screened: 217 did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria and 18 declined to participate in the classes. The primary reasons for declining to participate were (1) not being able to attend the groups due to scheduling dif ﬁculties and (2) choosing a program that was either recommended by, or af ﬁliated with the participant ’s OB/Gyn. All participants met the following criteria: (a) identi ﬁed as psychologically vulnerable to OCD, de ﬁned by a score of 139 or greater (1.25 SD above the community mean) on the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire, (b) age 18 e65; (c) married or living with a partner; and (d) expecting their ﬁ rst child. Participants were excluded if they met criteria for past or current OCD, psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, and/or current alcohol/substance abuse or dependence. Diagnoses were deter- mined using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID).

The sample ’s mean age was 27.3 years (SD ¼4.2), and 47 (66%) of the mothers were in their 2nd trimester. Participants endorsed the following ethnicities: Caucasian (74.6%), African eAmerican (16.9%), mixed/other (8.4%). Four participants completed the prenatal childbirth education classes with a female partner; three with a female relative due to the father ’s absence, and one with her same-sex partner. The remainder of the sample completed the classes with the father of the child. The mean household income was $64,000.

2.2. Procedures and prevention program The study design was a prospective, double (participant and evaluator) blinded, randomized controlled trial. Participants and their partners were randomly assigned to either the prevention program ( n¼ 38) or control ( n ¼ 33) condition, both of which were incorporated into a traditional childbirth education (CBE) program.

The CBE þprevention ( prevention) and CBE þcontrol ( control) programs were delivered in 6 weekly group sessions prior to childbirth. Each site enrolled 6 group cohorts. Participants were followed for 6 months after the birth of their child to assess the long-term effects of the prevention program. Assessments were conducted by trained, doctoral level graduate students before the ﬁ rst class (i.e., diagnostic interview), at the conclusion of the group, 1 month postpartum, 3 months postpartum and 6 months post- partum. All postpartum interviews were conducted over the tele- phone so as to reduce burden on the participants. The basic CBE program consisted of 6 weekly 1.5 h group meetings and covered a range of topics, including the stages of labor, newborn characteristics, and birthing techniques. At each site, a registered nurse certi ﬁed in CBE delivered this portion of the classes. At the conclusion of each weekly CBE topic, a 30 min session was added that addressed material relevant to either the prevention orcontrol condition. This latter portion of the class was delivered by trained study personnel (e.g., a psychology graduate student) from either the FSU or UNC site. The controlcondition K.R. Timpano et al. / Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 1512 consisted of psycho-education about general anxiety and the speciﬁc anxiety disorders. Participants were provided with a brief overview of symptoms, prevalence data, and associated demo- graphics for the DSM anxiety disorders. Because these presenta- tions were shorter than those in the preventioncondition, participants were also shown a series of 6 short videos that told the perinatal stories of several couples. The preventioncondition was derived from the cognitive-behavioral model of OCD ( Rachman, 1997, 1998 ) and included the following components: (class 1) education about postpartum anxiety and OCS (e.g., description of symptoms; prevalence; difference between OCS and postpartum depression or psychosis); (class 2) education about the cognitive model of emotion and how OCS ﬁt in this model, with a focus on the repercussion of misinterpreting intrusive thoughts; (classes 3 & 4) instruction in cognitive restructuring of dysfunctional “obsessive ” beliefs (e.g., identi ﬁcation of beliefs, process of challenging these beliefs, and how to modify them into more realistic beliefs); (class 5) instruction in using behavioral experiments and exposure techniques as a way of testing and modifying faulty beliefs, and (class 6) review and wrap-up. Particular emphasis was placed on addressing beliefs about the importance of, and need to control, intrusive thoughts about the infant. All of the class modules were manualized ( Timpano and Abramowitz, 2011 ), 1and all classes were video-taped and 25% were reviewed by the principal investigators to ensure adherence.

2.3. Assessment of depression, OCD related beliefs, and OCS Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Sale (EPDS), a reliable self-report scale that validly assesses the presence and severity of postnatal depressive symptoms ( Cox et al., 1987 ). The EPDS was completed at baseline, post-class, and all three postpartum assessments.

The Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ) was used to assess dysfunctional beliefs associated with OCD and OCS. The OBQ is a 44-item self-report instrument and has been found to possess good validity and reliability ( OCCWG, 2005; Tolin et al., 2003 ). In addition to a total score, three factor analytically derived subscales are used, including (1) overestimates of responsibility for, and threat of harm (responsibility/threat), (2) importance and control of intrusive thoughts (importance/control), and (3) perfectionism and the need for certainty (perfectionism/certainty). Given that the CBE-P condition speci ﬁcally targeted beliefs in the importance/ control domain, OBQ analyses were completed using the subscale scores. The OBQ was administered at baseline, post-class, and the 3 and 6 month postpartum assessments. Baseline OCS were assessed using the Dimensional Obsessive e Compulsive Scale (DOCS). The DOCS ( Abramowitz et al., 2010a)is a 20-item reliable and valid self-report scale that measures the severity of four empirically established dimensions of OCS: contam- ination, responsibility for harm and mistakes, unacceptable thoughts, and symmetry/completeness in clinical and non-clinical samples.

The presence and severity of postpartum OCS was examined using a semi-structured clinical interview, which included the Postpartum Thoughts and Behaviors Checklist (PTBC) and the Yale- Brown Obsessive eCompulsive Scale (YBOCS). The PTBC ( Abramowitz et al., 2006 ) is a modiﬁed version of the YBOCS symptom checklist, and consists of 32 common postpartum intru- sive thoughts or obsessions (e.g., thoughts about SIDS) and 14 behavioral and mental compulsions (e.g., frequently checking on the baby). The symptoms are grouped into 8 categories and participants were scored as either endorsing a category or not. The severity of these symptoms was then rated using the 10-item YBOCS ( Goodman et al., 1989a,b ), which yields a total score, in addition to two subscale scores for obsessions and compulsions.

The PTBC and YBOCS were administered at all three postpartum assessments by trained evaluators blind to treatment condition.

2.4. Statistical analyses All analyses were conducted using the SPSS 16.0 software package. A 2-tailed signi ﬁcance level of 0.05 was chosen a priori.

Demographic and pregnancy-related variables between groups were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. To examine the effects of group on continuous outcome variables (OBQ, EPDS, and YBOCS) we analyzed between-group differences using analysis of variance (ANOVA). For the primary outcome measure (YBOCS), we also used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for baseline OCS and depression symptoms. Within-group differences across the different time-points were examined using paired-sample t- tests. Differences in the PTBC were assessed using the chi-square test. Primary analyses were conducted with completers; however, an additional set of intent-to-treat analyses was conducted to rule- out potential drop-out effects. Prior to the primary data analyses, data screening was performed. This included descriptive statistics to check for data-entry errors, and identi ﬁcation of outliers. No gross violations were detected.

3. Results 3.1. Study population and baseline values All 71 participants completed the preventionorcontrol programs; however, only 58 ( prevention¼33 and control¼25) completed the 1 month postpartum assessment, 50 ( prevention¼3 1 andcontrol ¼19 ) the 3 month postpartum assessment, and 49 ( prevention¼29 and control ¼20) the 6 month postpartum assessment. Comparisons of completers and non-completers revealed no differences on any demographic or baseline psychological factors considered (all p ’s > 0.10). Participants in the two conditions did not differ from one another on any demographic variables considered, including age, ethnicity, education, and marital status (all p’s > 0.10). Baseline levels of psychological variables are summarized in Ta bl e 1. Participants in the prevention group did not differ from those in the controlgroup in pre-intervention levels of obsessive beliefs, depressive symptoms, or OCS (all p’s > 0.10).

3.2. Pregnancy and delivery-related factors In the overall sample, 80% reported that this was their ﬁrst pregnancy, and 10% endorsed having had fertility issues. In total, 72 infants were born, 30 of which were female. The two groups did not differ from one another on any delivery-related variables, Table 1 Baseline scores on psychological variables.

M (SD) Prevention ( n¼ 38) Control ( n¼ 33) tStatistic pValue Age 26.90 (3.6) 27.80 (4.8) 0.88 0.37 OBQ 172.70 (32.5) 166.64 (21.29) 0.92 0.36 EPDS 7.30 (5.10) 6.34 (4.63) 0.83 0.41 DOCS 9.30 (9.11) 6.60 (6.01) 1.46 0.15 Note . Prevention ¼Childbirth education plus prevention program; con- trol ¼Childbirth education plus control; OBQ ¼Obsessive beliefs questionnaire; EPDS ¼Edinburgh postpartum depression scale; DOCS ¼Dimensional obsessive e compulsive scale. 1A copy of the prevention program manual is available from the authors. K.R. Timpano et al. / Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 1513 including: obstetric complications, mode of delivery (c-section or vaginal delivery), use of pain management, sex of baby, or prema- ture delivery (allp’s > 0.10). At 1 month postpartum 79% of the prevention group and 76% of the controlgroup reported breast- feeding their infants ( X 2¼5.08, p< 0.08).

3.3. Change in depressive symptoms and obsessive beliefs The two groups did not differ signi ﬁcantly at any postpartum time point on levels of depressive symptoms (all ANOVA p’s > 0.10).

Within-group analyses also revealed that there were no changes in depressive symptoms from baseline to 6 months postpartum (all p ’s > 0.10). Similarly, the two groups did not demonstrate any between or within-group differences in the responsibility/threat or perfectionism/certainty subscales of the OBQ. In contrast, analyses (ANOVAs) of the importance/control OBQ subscale revealed group differences ( Fig. 1). Speci ﬁcally, the prevention group had signi ﬁ- cantly lower scores at every post-class and postpartum assessment than the controlgroup (all p’s < 0.01). Within-group analyses demonstrated that while the preventiongroup maintained an initial decrease in scores following the classes, the controlcondition evi- denced a modest, yet signi ﬁcant increase following the birth of the baby ( Fig. 1).

3.4. Assessment of postpartum OCS Table 2 summarizes the percentage of each group that endorsed any given PTBC category at each of the three postpartum assess- ments. Among both groups, thoughts about accidents (e.g., “ thoughts about a neighbor ’s dog attacking the baby ”) were the most frequently reported types of postpartum intrusive thoughts.

The least frequently endorsed category of intrusive thoughts was sexual thoughts (e.g., “a thought about the baby’ s genitals”). Chi- square analyses revealed that the two groups did not differ from one another on endorsement rate in any of the categories, at any of the three assessment time-points (all p’s > 0.10).

3.5. Assessment of postpartum OCS severity The prevention group had signi ﬁcantly lower YBOCS total scores than the controlgroup at all three postpartum assessments, controlling for baseline OCS and depression scores ( Fig. 2). Exam- ination of Cohen ’s d revealed a small-medium intervention effect at 1 month postpartum, and a medium-large intervention effect at 3 and 6 months postpartum ( T able 3). At all three time-points, the control group reported mild, yet clinically signi ﬁcant levels of OCS (YBOCS >8; Goodman et al., 1989a ). In contrast, thepreventioncondition had subclinical levels across the postpartum assess- ments. Within-group analyses revealed that although the control group did not show any changes across time, the preventiongroup had signi ﬁcantly lower YBOCS scores at 6 months postpartum compared to 1 month postpartum ( t¼ 2.77, p< 0.01). A similar pattern of results emerged when the YBOCS obsessions and compulsions subscale scores were considered separately ( Table 3).

We next conducted a 2 (condition: preventionandcontrol group) 4 (time: baseline, 1 month postpartum, 3 month post- partum, 6 month postpartum) mixed model ANOVA to examine changes in OCS severity from baseline across the postpartum period. Because the YBOCS was not administered at baseline, we standardized the baseline DOCS scores and the three YBOCS post- partum scores, and used the standardized scores in our analysis.

Findings revealed a signi ﬁcant time condition interaction ( Fig. 3), Fig. 1. Mean levels of the importance and control of thoughts OC beliefs across assessments. Table 2 Percent endorsement of PTBC categories across 3 postpartum assessments.

PTBC category mo pp Prevention Control X 2 pvalue Suffocation 1 70.6% 76.0% 0.21 0.64 3 71.0% 52.6% 1.72 0.19 6 36.7% 57.1% 2.09 0.15 Violence 1 51.4% 68.0% 1.65 0.20 3 48.4% 36.8% 0.64 0.43 6 26.7% 30.0% 0.07 0.80 Accidents 1 82.4% 80.0% 0.05 0.82 3 74.2% 84.2% 0.69 0.41 6 76.7% 75.0% 0.02 0.89 Losing the baby 1 44.1% 36.0% 0.39 0.53 3 45.2% 47.4% 0.02 0.88 6 56.7% 45.0% 0.65 0.42 Contamination 1 55.9% 64.0% 0.39 0.53 3 48.4% 57.9% 0.43 0.51 6 60.0% 52.4% 0.29 0.59 Sexual 1 11.8% 12.0% 0.00 0.98 3 9.7% 10.5% 0.01 0.92 6 6.7% 5.0% 0.06 0.81 Illness 1 26.5% 23.1% 0.09 0.76 3 16.1% 15.0% 0.01 0.91 6 20.0% 20.0% 0.00 1.00 Compulsions 1 91.4% 82.1% 1.21 0.27 3 77.4% 85.0% 0.44 0.51 6 83.3% 90.0% 0.44 0.51 Note: PTBC ¼Postpartum thoughts and behaviors checklist; mo pp ¼month(s) postpartum; prevention ¼Childbirth education plus prevention program; con- trol ¼Childbirth education plus control. Fig. 2. Mean levels of OCS severity across postpartum assessments, controlling for baseline OCS and depression symptoms. Both between and within-group differences are depicted.

K.R. Timpano et al. / Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 1514 F(1, 34)¼4.83, p< 0.01. Simple effect analyses were conducted to examine the form of this interaction. ANOVA analyses revealed that the groups did not differ at baseline; however, signi ﬁcant group differences emerged during the postpartum period ( Fig. 3).

Speci ﬁcally, we found that the preventiongroup endorsed fewer OCS during the postpartum, compared to the controlgroup.

3.6. Intent-to-treat analysis We conducted follow-up intent-to-treat analyses using the last observation carried forward ( Mazumdar et al., 1999). The pattern of effects was identical to those observed in our completer analyses.

4. Discussion The current investigation represents the ﬁrst example of a prevention program designed speci ﬁcally to target postpartum OCS. Results provide support for the utility of incorporating a CBT- based prevention program into a traditional CBE curriculum. Our intervention falls in-line with a recent psycho-educational program developed by Fisher et al. (2010) , which was found helpful in pre- venting general mood, anxiety and adjustment disorders in the postpartum. That program did not target speci ﬁc anxiety symp- toms, but the ﬁndings speak to the general amenability of the perinatal population for prevention efforts. Our investigation suggests that a more targeted prevention program packaged into a CBE course is both feasible and practical: two important consid- erations for any prevention work ( Dozois, 2004). We used an indicated prevention program design ( Feldner et al., 2004 ), meaning that our intervention focused on a subsyndromal risk factor (i.e., obsessive beliefs) for obsessions and compulsions.

Results demonstrated that relative to a credible control condition, our prevention program reduced levels of this risk factor, speci ﬁ- cally with respect to the primary target; that is, beliefs regarding the importance of thoughts and the need to control them. Exami- nation of our OCS outcome measure supported our hypothesis that the prevention program would reduce the degree to which OCS developed during the postpartum period. Although, as expected, both groups endorsed comparable levels of the incidence of common postpartum obsessions and compulsions as measured by the PTBC, the two groups differed signi ﬁcantly in the severity of these symptoms. The YBOCS severity indices capture time spent on symptoms, the distress and impairment associated with them, and the ability to control obsessions/compulsions. We can therefore conclude that despite experiencing postpartum intrusive thoughts, participants in the preventiongroup were not as distressed by them; perhaps as a result of the differential reduction in obsessive beliefs. Finally, we found that these effects were speci ﬁc to OCS, since between-group differences remained signi ﬁcant after controlling for baseline depression symptoms. Although some authors have reported marked decreases in OCS following childbirth ( Uguz et al., 2007), this was not the case for our control group. While the preventiongroup evidenced continued decreases in the severity of OCS, participants in the controlgroup reported relatively stable OCS across the 6 month postpartum period with YBOCS scores consistently within the mild yet clinically signi ﬁcant range of symptoms ( Goodman et al., 1989a). One explanation for the difference in ﬁndings may be cultural. The investigation by Uguz et al. (2007) was conducted in Turkey, and they hypothesized that the decrease in symptoms might be attributed to increased levels of social support and decreased levels of stressors following the birth of the baby. Other research has suggested that pregnancy and the postpartum period is associated with an adverse impact on the new mother ’s physical and emotional health ( Miller and Sollie, 1980; Schytt and Hildingsson, 2011 ), and in the United States it is not always typical for extended family to assist as extensively during the postpartum period as in other cultures. Our approach to prevention in the present research focused exclusively on psychological factors. Yet given that dysfunctional cognitions only partially predict postpartum OCS (e.g., Abramowitz et al., 2006 ), additional work is needed to elucidate other factors involved in the development of this problem. Certain biological factors, for example, have been proposed given that pregnancy and the postpartum are marked by ﬂuctuations in hormones ( Steiner et al., 2003 ), brain morphology ( Kim et al., 2010), and certain genetic polymorphisms ( Costas et al., 2010). If biological markers of postpartum OCS could be identi ﬁed, this might allow for better detection of candidates for prevention programs such as that examined in our investigation. The present study used a prospective, randomized, controlled- trial design, which was meant to stringently evaluate the effects of our prevention program. One limitation, however, was that there was no assessment of the degree to which participants imple- mented the techniques included in the preventionprogram. We are therefore not able to speak to whether the reduction in symptoms stems from the use of cognitive restructuring, exposure techniques, or the OCS speci ﬁc psycho-education. The intervention may also have been effective by reducing levels of obsessive beliefs. We found that although the preventioncondition maintained lowered OBQ levels, the controlcondition experienced a slight increase in obsessive beliefs following the birth of the baby. Future research should examine speci ﬁc mechanisms by which change may have Fig. 3. A 2 (condition) 4 (time) mixed ANOVA to examine changes in OCS severity across assessments.

Table 3 Mean OCS across postpartum assessments and magnitude of treatment effect.

1mopp 3mopp 6mopp Mean (SD)dMean (SD) dMean (SD) d YBOCS 0.410.680.73 Prevention 7.27 (4.87) 5.90 (5.00) 4.45 (4.16) Control 9.68 (6.74) 10.42 (8.03) 8.65 (6.93) YBOCS-obs 0.390.620.70 Prevention 3.29 (2.42) 2.84 (2.27) 2.17 (1.76) Control 4.36 (3.03) 4.68 (3.46) 4.00 (3.24) YBOCS-comp 0.310.670.71 Prevention 4.21 (3.09) 3.06 (3.08) 2.34 (2.64) Control 5.32 (4.02) 5.74 (4.71) 4.65 (3.80) Note. mo pp ¼month(s) postpartum; YBOCS ¼Yale-brown obsessive ecompulsive scale; obs ¼obsessions subscale score; comp ¼compulsions subscale score; pre- vention ¼Childbirth education plus prevention program; control ¼Childbirth education plus control. K.R. Timpano et al. / Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 1515 occurred. Another limitation is that symptoms of depression were ascertained by self-report. A closer inspection of these symptoms is warranted, given the overlap between OCS and depression symp- toms. Multiple reports have pointed to the possibility that these two constructs may represent a spectrum of perinatal psychiatric symptoms (Abramowitz et al., 2010b; Austin et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2006 ). In fact, OCD was the only anxiety disorder predictive of false-positives for depression in one recent study ( Mauri et al., 2010 ). Aﬁnal limitation is that we did not assess factors relevant to social support and the relationship between parents. An inves- tigation by Iles et al. (2011) demonstrated that both perceived support and attachment patterns play a role in posttraumatic stress symptoms and depression during the postpartum period. The same processes may be important in the generation of OCS, particularly as family members are often implicated in the completion of compulsions or are impacted by excessive reassurance seeking on the part of the affected relative ( Albert et al., 2010).

Given the signi ﬁcant personal and societal burden associated with OCD ( Lopez and Murray, 1998 ), and in particular, perinatal OCD ( Fairbrother and Abramowitz, 2007 ), it is striking that very little attention has been given to the prevention of these symptoms.

The present investigation represents a seminal step in our efforts to enhance traditional therapies and develop new avenues to prevent OCD. The identi ﬁcation of vulnerable mothers during the perinatal period offers a unique opportunity to directly target speci ﬁc and, importantly, modi ﬁable risk factors. Future research should consider additional risk factors that could be targeted, as well as the beneﬁ cial effects prevention programs may have on the global functioning of mother and child. The prevention program described in the current report is relatively inexpensive and viable, and lowering OCS using a cognitive and behavioral intervention may reduce the need for psychotropic medications during the perinatal period ( Oberlander et al., 2006 ). Future research may consider more stream-lined methods for identifying at-risk mothers, and also the possibility of training CBE instructors to deliver the CBT curriculum.

Con ﬂict of interest Authors Timpano, Schmidt, Mitchell, Abramowitz, & Mahaffey have no con ﬂicts of interest.

Role of funding source Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the Inter- national Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Foundation (IOCDF) to K.R.

Timpano (PI). The IOCDF had no further role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors Authors Timpano, Abramowitz, and Schmidt designed the study and wrote the protocol. Authors Mahaffey and Mitchell helped with data collection efforts and acted as project coordinators. Author Timpano wrote the ﬁrst draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the ﬁnal manuscript.

Acknowledgments We thank Heidi Chavers and Elissa Brody, who delivered the childbirth education programs at the FSU and UNC sites, respectively. References Abramowitz JS, Deacon BJ, Olatunji BO, Wheaton MG, Berman NC, Losardo D, et al.

Assessment of obsessive ecompulsive symptom dimensions: development and evaluation of the dimensional obsessive ecompulsive scale. Psychological Assessment 2010a;22:180 e98.

Abramowitz JS, Khandker M, Nelson CA, Deacon BJ, Rygwall R. The role of cognitive factors in the pathogenesis of obsessive ecompulsive symptoms: a prospective study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2006;44:1361 e74 .

Abramowitz JS, Meltzer-Brody S, Leserman J, Killenberg S, Rinaldi K, Mahaffey BL, et al. Obsessional thoughts and compulsive behaviors in a sample of women with postpartum mood symptoms. Archives of Women ’s Mental Health 2010b; 13:523 e30.

Abramowitz JS, Nelson CA, Rygwall R, Khandker M. The cognitive mediation of obsessive ecompulsive symptoms: a longitudinal study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2007;21:91 e104.

Abramowitz JS, Schwartz SA, Moore KM. Obsessional thoughts in postpartum females and their partners: content, severity and relationship with depression.

Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 2003a;10:157 e64.

Abramowitz JS, Schwartz SA, Moore KM, Luenzmann KR. Obsessive ecompulsive symptoms in pregnancy and the puerperium: a review of the literature. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2003b;17:461 e78.

Ahmad TFE, Suleiman R, Shougah D. Mixed anxiety depression in pregnancy: (the inﬂuence of misconceptions). Arab Journal of Psychiatry 1994;5:103 e13 .

Albert U, Bogetto F, Maina G, Saracco P, Brunatto C, Mataix-Cols D. Family accommodation in obsessive ecompulsive disorder: relation to symptom dimensions, clinical and family characteristics. Psychiatry Research 2010; 17 9 : 2 0 4 e11.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. 4th ed .. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.; 1994.

Austin M, Tully L, Parker G. Examining the relationship between antenatal anxiety and postnatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 2007;101:169 e74 .

Buttolph ML, Hollander AD. Obsessive ecompulsive disorder in pregnancy and childbirth. In: Jenike MA, Baer L, Minichiello WE, editors. Obsessi- ve ecompulsive disorder: theory and management. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1990.

Chaudron LH, Nirodi N. The obsessive ecompulsive spectrum in the perinatal period: a prospective pilot study. Archives of Women ’s Mental Health 2010;13:

403 e10 .

Coplan RJ, O ’Neil K, Arbeau KA. Maternal anxiety during and after pregnancy and infant temperament at three months of age. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health 2005;19:199 e215.

Costas J, Gratacòs M, Escaramís G, Martín-Santos R, de Diego Y, Baca-García E, et al. Association study of 44 candidate genes with depressive and anxiety symptoms in post-partum women. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2010;44:717 e24.

Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. British Journal of Psychiatry 1987;150:782 e6.

Dozois DJ. Prevention of anxiety psychopathology: conceptual, methodological, and practical issues. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2004;11:425 e 9.

Dupont RL. “Town Hall ”panel presentation. The anxiety disorders of America conference. Charleston, SC; 1993.

Fairbrother N, Abramowitz JS. New parenthood as a risk factor for the development of obsessional problems. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2007;45:2155 e63.

Feldner MT, Zvolensky MJ, Schmidt NB. Prevention of anxiety psychopathology: a critical review of the empirical literature. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2004;11:405 e24.

Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Vera Y, Gil K, Diego M, Bendell D, et al. Anxiety and anger effects on depressed mother einfant spontaneous and imitative interactions.

Infant Behavior & Development 2005;28:1 e9.

Fisher JRW, Wynter KH, Rowe HJ. Innovative psycho-educational program to prevent common postpartum mental disorders in primiparous women:

a before and after controlled study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:432.

Foa EB, Franklin ME, Kozak MJ. Psychosocial treatments for obsessive ecompulsive disorder: literature review. In: Swinson RP, Antony MM, Rachman S, Richter MA, editors. Obsessive ecompulsive disorder: theory, research and treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1998.

Forray A, Focseneanu M, Pittman B, McDougle CJ, Epperson CN. Onset and exac- erbation of obsessive ecompulsive disorder in pregnancy and the postpartum period. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2010;71:1061 e8.

Godfrey JR. Toward optimal health: Donna E, Stewart, M.D. discusses perinatal depression. Journal of Women ’s Health 2005;14:803 e7.

Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C. The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry 1989a;46:1006 e11.

Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Delgado P, Heninger GR, et al. The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale. II. Validity. Archives of General Psychiatry 1989b;46:1012 e6.

Heron J, O ’Connor TG, Evans J, Golding J, Glover V. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample.

Journal of Affective Disorders 2004;80:65 e73.

Iles J, Slade P, Spiby H. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and postpartum depression in couples after childbirth: the role of partner support and attachment. Journal of Anxiety Disorders; 2011. K.R. Timpano et al. / Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 1516 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalenceand age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005;62:593 e602.

Kim P, Leckman JF, Mayes LC, Feldman R, Wang X, Swain JE. The plasticity of human maternal brain: longitudinal changes in brain anatomy during the early post- partum period. Behavioral Neuroscience 2010;124:695 e700.

Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry 2001;158:848 e56.

Labad J, Menchon JM, Alonso P, Segalas C, Jimenez S, Vallejo J. Female reproductive cycle and obsessive ecompulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2005; 66:428 e35. quiz 546.

Larsen KE, Schwarts SA, Whiteside SP, Khandker M, Moore KM, Abramowitz JS. Thought control strategies used by parents reporting postpartum obsessions.

Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly 2006;20:435 e45.

Logsdon MC, Wisner K, Billings DM, Shanaham B. Raising the awareness of primary care providers about postpartum depression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 2006;27:59 e73.

Lopez AD, Murray CC. The global burden of disease, 1990 e2020. Nature Medicine 1998;4:1241 e3.

Lou HC, Hansen D, Nordentoft M, Pryds O, Jensen F, Nim J, et al. Prenatal stressors of human life affect fetal brain development. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1994;36:826 e32.

Manassis K, Bradley S, Goldberg S, Hood J, Swinson RP. Behavioural inhibition, attachment and anxiety in children of mothers with anxiety disorders. Cana- dian Journal of Psychiatry 1995;40:87 e92.

Mauri M, Oppo A, Montagnani MS, Borri C, Banti S, Camilleri V, et al. Beyond “postpartum depressions ”: speciﬁc anxiety diagnoses during pregnancy predict different outcomes. Results from PND-ReScU. Journal of Affective Disorders 2010;127:177 e84.

Mazumdar S, Liu KS, Houck PR, Reynolds CF. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal clinical trials: coping with the challenge of missing values. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1999;33:87 e95.

McLean PD, Whittal ML, Thordarson DS, Taylor S, Sochting I, Koch WJ, et al. Cognitive versus behavior therapy in the group treatment of obsessive ecompulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2001;69:205 e14 .

Miller BC, Sollie DL. Normal stresses during the transition to parenthood. Family Relations 1980;29:459 e65.

Miller RL, Pallant JF, Negri LM. Anxiety and stress in the postpartum: is there more to postnatal distress than depression? BMC Psychiatry 2006;6:12.

Mulder EJ, Robles de Medina PG, Huizink AC, Van den Bergh BR, Buitelaar JK, Visser GH. Prenatal maternal stress: effects on pregnancy and the (unborn) child. Early Human Development 2002;70:3 e14 . Oberlander TF, Warburton W, Misri S, Aghajanian J, Hertzman C. Neonatal outcomes after prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepres- sants and maternal depression using population-based linked health data.

Archives of General Psychiatry 2006;63:898 e906.

Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory ePart 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2005;43:1527 e42.

Rachman S. A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1997;35:793 e802.

Rachman S. A cognitive theory of obsessions: elaborations. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1998;36:385 e40 1.

Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for post- partum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. General Hospital Psychiatry 2004;26:289 e95.

Ross LE, McLean LM. Anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2006;67:1285 e98.

Salkovskis PM, Forrester E, Richards C. Cognitive-behavioural approach to under- standing obsessional thinking. British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement; 1998:53 e63.

Schytt E, Hildingsson I. Physical and emotional self-rated health among Swedish women and men during pregnancy and the ﬁrst year of parenthood. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2011;2:57 e64.

Steiner M, Dunn E, Born L. Hormones and mood: from menarche to menopause and beyond. Journal of Affective Disorders 2003;74:67 e83.

Sutter-Dallay AL, Giaconne-Marcesche V, Glatigny-Dallay E, Verdoux H. Women with anxiety disorders during pregnancy are at increased risk of intense postnatal depressive symptoms: a prospective survey of the MATQUID cohort.

European Psychiatry 2004;19:459 e63.

Timpano KR, Abramowitz JS. BabyPREP: a postpartum OCS prevention program. Unpublished manuscript; 2011.

Tolin DF, Woods C, Abramowitz JS. Relationship between obsessional beliefs and obsessive ecompulsive symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2003;27:

657 e69.

Uguz F, Gezginc K, Zeytinci I, Karatayli S, Askin R, Guler O, et al. Course of obses- siveecompulsive disorder during early postpartum period: a prospective analysis of 16 cases. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2007;48:558 e61.

Williams KE, Koran LM. Obsessive ecompulsive disorder in pregnancy, the puer- perium, and the premenstruum. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1997;58:330 e4.

quiz 335 e6.

Zambaldi CF, Cantilino A, Montenegro AC, Paes JA, de Albuquerque TLC, Sougey EB.

Postpartum obsessive ecompulsive disorder: prevalence and clinical charac- teristics. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2009;50:503 e9. K.R. Timpano et al. / Journal of Psychiatric Research 45 (2011) 1511 e1517 1517