3 pages due 9 hrs
W4A2 Rubric
| Unsatisfactory 1 | Emerging 2 | Proficient 3 | Exemplary 4 | Score | |||||||||
| Assignment Components | |||||||||||||
| Identify and describe the sample with demographics in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2. | Report included minimal information about the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2. | Report described a few details about the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2. The description was short and missed several details. | Report described the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2 accurately. More details could have been provided. | Report described the sample in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2 well. Accurate and adequate details were provided. | [Score x 10 = 24 pts] | ||||||||
| Discussed the steps for the data collection process used in the studies. | Minimal discussion was provided on the data collection process in the studies. | The discussion included an outline of the data collection process used in the studies. | The discussion included a clear and complete data collection process used in the studies. | The discussion included a clear, detailed, and complete data collection process used in the studies. | [Score x 4 = 16 pts] | ||||||||
| Identified the variables (independent and dependent) | Variables were listed with no detail. | Those variables identified were correct but incompletely identified.. | The identified variables were correct but lacked detail. | The variables for the studies were all identified and clearly described. | Score x 4 = 16 pts] | ||||||||
| Identified the sampling design for each study. | The identified sampling design is incomplete for each study | The identified sampling design is somewhat clear and correct for each study. | The identified sampling design is clear and correct for each study. | The identified sampling design is clear and detailed and demonstrates a deep understanding of the studies. | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] | ||||||||
| Described the instrument or tool or survey used in each article. | Minimal or no description was included about the instrument, tool, or survey in each article. | Description was included on the instrument, tool, or survey. However, the description missed several details in each article. | Description was included on the instrument or tool or survey. The description included most details in each article. | A clear and detailed description was included on the instrument, tool, or survey in each article. | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] | ||||||||
| Summarized the discussion regarding the validity and reliability of the instrument for each article. | Vaguely summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument for each article. | Summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument with minimum details for each article. | Summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument with most details for each article. | Summarized the discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument with complete and well- supported details for each article. | [Score x 5 = 20 pts] | ||||||||
| Discussed the legal and ethical concerns from each research article. Included IRB approval and informed consent. | Ineffectively defined the legal and ethical concerns from each research article. Did not include IRB approval or informed consent. | Defined legal and ethical concerns from each research article. Provided some aspects of IRB approval and informed consent. | Defined legal and ethical concerns from each research article which included some aspects of IRB approval and informed consent. Specific examples and resources are used in support. | Defined legal and ethical concerns from each research article which included all aspects of IRB approval and informed consent. Specific, unique examples and resources are used in support. | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] | ||||||||
| Written Components | |||||||||||||
| Organization | Did not follow template format | Followed format of template for some criteria | Followed format of template for most criteria | Followed format of template | [Score x 1 = 4 pts]
| ||||||||
| Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure | Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. | Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. | Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. | The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. | [Score x 4 =16 pts] | ||||||||
| APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations | No attempt at APA format. | APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. | Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor. | Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] | ||||||||
| Subtotal | |||||||||||||
| Timeliness | Late Work penalty: | ||||||||||||
| Total Score | / 140 | ||||||||||||
|
|
