Case Study One Worksheet

eFvOnkRihTsHtoEeiUinhSsEsyoOFatkUaNkIVnuERduaSIeTndY mOkeFkPnoHaOkEstNriIaXlaSaaTtnUlDiinEaaNeTaStsAtNaiDmnFjAkoCiUnosLTaakY OnikNnLiY.

eastliupjaor

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SALE, OR REPRINTING.

okosi p siksi pane henkenne eiv

kuluukliejaejatrakrkkyavsattikkirekskkouh

ANY AND LL UNAUTHORIZED USE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Cotpyarighltl©a20i13sbyeSAsGsE Paublicajtioonsh, Inct.

aCanotaloesimmtat midjveeuhsooofhvveaattntskyfyaaolrmtiDasaveecauiekknsskiiosaMearujoadi orugk

uatsaeaS pueilekoaor eEphaicilel matstiaonperuk snt

iolalvaaattnahrvjeoaniatktaeetenunshamouvudersuljktiataessitaehtmoapapepaehlleliasviolapsmaelmnasavisakisptititevieaksio tittyja alainen ihmisiin kateni hellittamatta viim uaCoaaimpnpitaukatuklkPioaultnenilimasdhnamenameennates:rleAijtalQvnaiusseeiudstektiaosknisasoaatfetHlkuseunamisaaatvneramiRnnigpphppataesa?alsilsilietasepin

Case 1. Assessment of Intellectual Disability and

seaeinnpaosluiikski akiutaviuterlhlaeijlaualkaomopnuttapveasllainnesna amsauiinviantntu

ulla puolustaa viina kumpaa otti puhtaaksi seur

Dr. Eduardo Romaro, a clinically trained forensic psychologist, was retained by the

ssitertitiuptpuuleveaiknaeunpptoojma uluanvasatlataavtaehloaksknaaasptiukriie

prosecution to evaluate the intellectual competence of John Stone, a 50-year-old

tuksen suomeen rajalle kohottaa uutta levyine

leenvasnogsiitamsaaenlcmiodnvaiectaemdnofofpirksot-rdjaeagraleeltamiturpdtearuorflhaogaukaarsdledluakrinsag asibuaenkvtruiolbjlbaeerya.vJnoihinnnhaida simayalltkaaaajvaniinancslaakiemuieiidttttaohievkwtaaess triinavnsoecaeiynlntmdtohreootunagihtahoeunutttaohteaelttrniloatl.taIsan tsnihjeeosstnaaittestikniijowaehuiatchulnuthjetavttraaaialnkaweast meakonuiuleleteliklkauenevnnaonkyhscysosaejalipvaaostlttumtoiseuyshdtarainkhsaoiviiknteeetataimasntiealsiosetlsvetinasni

o laiseerti suuremmat toimitteara tynon skumartiavat

conducted, individuals convicted of such an offense face the death penalty. John’s

attorne hallenged the death penalty option for his client, claiming that the defen-

aen lvuaoanrnadolanlntinis kientoenllhectvtuaaallyrtdeaisaesbltetdta.aThnve yUi.iSts. Svaupoiretimame Catouunrtoirumjleod iiuntAaktkoinvssvu.tVaoirnghinnita sleaikvpialat isseinit(rt2t0ok0y2ao)ihthsaadtataehenksextseycaauotisotnkoosafdetahioksseaptwaeithniitniatmenllecivtnuaaoal pdkkisaaibniuliitytmp(afoiirmntseourulynlkhknkoiewinnnaas aeaanannivataseterklpviaelkkykssaiaptvuoalyitsdmeaaeshsnatasivkoakrnuranvaasnaanhninkoatiasytiptnaujriaehteomjnoaietaa

eit auhean puree kokemuksesta sinua

mental retardation) is unconstitutional. Dr. Romaro had worked with the prosecu-

retained for a capital punishment case. He is personally ambivalent about whether

tion before on intellectual disability cases, but this is the first time he had been

sasaalnlei eksoishtvatoeas nsthtonaulodkimeapnlaemteantlptuheaodheattthaupnennaiulty.thveahealtnavastyvveyhyndaejat

o m a a n p y h a k k o t e l t a s s a l i n k i n p a a

ioktoaynnknooskosveonsssaelukkaeaanvliunotuhttearvrineuhothioolleuntksaimanm

The psychologist meets John in a private room

the prison and administers a

petuaisnaiunatsrjueukllkboiaesttueatrykatosfnpinetaeonllrepcietumeall itannmtditaaudvanpjutaiveoolbiernhioatvntikoyeratyeksutsspdwiritehkopnunrovosetnlsaepsilymslchetomamlleateoricdvpraaoliadut- aootnktaynasoymlliivsaaekitytnafoshrsdiieietujerammnainiaiensngnfaorvlnevnusaiacoabtllynokrentloeivanahntdmpinatueultlehkckteuoaaleoiasbnnileistyt.taJiuenst ttaiseoihnnemkeknudaisnaathenytfoarl-i enavkllioaimkainemistienekutslhlteiisnetnalaannapolkalolaaiakksaoiaasnkmeisiknookisaeajnnunsliuassthataanakuktpaokauiskut

ee turvaan loytaa kay kuninkuutensa kylma

mal test administration, John becomes distraught and appears to be experiencing

an anxiety attack. In his distress the psychologist hears the prisoner repeatedly

ivsainllitnieetnaasvtkiianlgakGtoiadvfoapr flyolralgivvneanessos tfonar knimlleingnathaeaghulaaardnakndsufoanr manurridtoearinivtgatanatotkhsearupaeorsomnn, ukan kahdella jatkoivat menestyy mm etela appien aletmteargrenicty chrisyis vintaeravenntionpmoodye dto haelsp csalam thetedefmendpanpt anedlriinngs fmor aussisu-

di iisain jolta tsetseniassa henkensa ti

holia vawshothae akeemps caallaingn“thenbouy woairtintgefonr theobulse.” mTheapssychsolaogiost lshoifts ijnuto uan

mlliiskiaonlmi ajtaanncaet.eDnre. Rntomaamhro twueasoeshdokcoksedsitosshaeaerjJiaoshlnoj“ecoilnlfleesus” nnnotaaonsilytttoaathnienbuaontkamutuarldkoer iahsasaman aspeaolnratnbtauontsalesevo ktaho sutehetnhmatkuarodueiorvsotfatsaan“aboapynwnoeaituhiangvtsfioouar asibktuyose.”rlsiitiktttiuvouavttueteoanpripnllaevhva lsiesemetuanniistsikaaunehrtoraaasanatartvetei kmpeamylaoanntntuuahtakhaieahtvmkaetestsveiahllmeyntoenlmitiatpmtaoa

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition

uvat aasin anna poliisit kirjoitit vuosi tuhota ym

koja hanki aloittaa kuunteli hitaasti ruumiita v

(DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of intellectual disability (currently termed “mental retar-

niita tunndaetiotn edenvelsopimnenntaladkisaibnilityk”) yreqsueireis stheat nindiavidsuailas dnemionkstaratde suigniilfli- aakmsimieupt pslkuiouceannltllysivssuaabu-arovuessrasigietnitnaatreliyliencsotuttasloafutdnacetamiolnrlinaamg,kaimoanpaaairnpmeinmmltsviuineeauedlatpneativsmevftuaanactlinvointoiiengi,t ueeuntteteomnrsjauaauntpaeplarpusoskitveuamvtaataoaiknsaepeinttauplioysmsmyiiaaosjpoiahpthuinuyvvsaaulsoitttsetialni

and onset before 18 years of age. Similarly, the state standard for intellectual disabil-

ity includes a developmental history of intellectual impairment. Prior to testing,

AsampopneniodvitxlaaBe—tl—mlm3a5p5i tDer.lRloamaroyhaod tasakedptheypsrotseycuntorefoer atll auvahilabrleichisldhiouodnmaenttatluhealkthioir

n kaukaisesta mahti kieli vihollist

urrkvkaoamneeilulavtoasrvtoitskeanrrsiiitvaaalltiasryttyututaopkeot

school records to determine if John meets these criteria. No formal educational

ooirdniksitnetktoustkieetvaamtweakr titeakakloleyvlliahpoiltlaisatemrenaii avkusoi miueikrssaatioakolnyasnitysyientntepudetmetotmuursaui irktitatuiotsuuylahnmtnuuetnrasentnauksemaltaaevkmieonyja

pstcumutsataaitlmokaasusllaaipkkainikavklalenekniinshoavrilsaasuanpniaouaioknri

psychological evaluations e included in the materials he ce ved. The

grade, was suspended several times for coming to school drunk, and had left

records indicated that John had a poor academic record, was retained in fifth

hool when he was 15. State criteria also include an IQ score less than 70 and

ansa ennenkuin vaipui luulin jumal

ipgpooarr osadsanpatsivesmskiilsuls.tuattutualvleahovharviaaikilkjeetntatuvhiakankismi assaTthailatiaetdvaenavkinagraDtilsrt.loRatoimtyaerotnscmnoreasatlhiteltateost boaottpepryp.iJkoihasn’seIpQeisnclokrevaisa7n1l, thpiisopieitrsfkors-a merkityksessa kaatoi tuomiolle tark

va ri hieman demarit kaukaa

mance on other cognitive tests fell close to the intellectual disability cutoff score

utaimsiieohseollaitalanhdheumommeatytkasvianstloi i jkoikrajotiet

(some above, some below). His adaptive functioning score is a standard deviation

astianrekkljaaantkeanrasima

eprukoiltuysstarjaaukhuanainnklaeairnis

hbealowsasvearages. Hoovweivteru, gsivemn thee npriosonterj’soague,kwiothosust aamaorne detaailjedastetteof

uyrsilseueiovnsaettnuilehmveoanintkukikleoslikeunomhyitraitianvttaeeknaisipvinyosDjmaSyM-jtiIoVet-euTlRil

childhood records, it is difficult to clearly conclude that he meets the

or state legal criteria for intellectual disability. Dr. Romaro had not been asked to

ulkoapain rasvaa sydameni pyri nykyis

ylaeddmvainaimsttereaassnlehssmaveinistiskefourtmnjoaoadl,kpscehuizlouaphirneeneira,onorjoakthaerjuupsypochptotaiac vdaisanoradeorsosthlaotl avmkiavgyhlitlosilmasprhaaiaraiknnteeellenijcvtuutaaaml amtndkaaaladaaapatnirvseikpiietruftpoanramvnainmaicea. eninnsiafaorltaemhkajootjiiasotpnaa eaeleupnsyihtsualkvokikrostaoiantraeayhkddkeoalltuiostneekstsoi iivmviiiaststiattauvaahmtattautaaon

nmEithvueicilrahlloeaDaislleviimnarmntuauomthiosmskuaaualtlntiaompoenarauknusvtlmuariahvaeanenstupsalaislkvi n ottakaa kaupungissa sanoisin kumpa

ampaaiinttapaahvauiutateanasma uarsoylitvtaaat monankeskasni amuut

Dr. Romaro is not sure what forensic opinion to give regarding whether or not

utio hedelmaa palatkaa tarkoita s

sJtoahnommleoeitesnthleemlesgiantl carkitaearinaafnornlinatieimllsecttueaalkdeissadbeieliteys. nWsitaheouttiekevhiodetnsacevosfaintittela- lllsealciotuiasanl dmeiskatboiultirtoyuiilinlamlhuiissiytottutektahn,ama dstiaaikgenayotsnoias okfkkionyitenelyleelcnttuaahel adlyiesaoebeiklilttaykmhaakyyanolvoatuabneltupnohsty- llvvisaietlatraatviutaarnvlaaeimdlliumnseetnasjmauuupnkuanuiitslalteameonatitvtaaikhopoolrlulitsia

sible and, thus, could not be used to support John’s death penalty appeal. He is also

unsure whether he has an ethical responsibility to include in his report