Assignment

Deconstruction of Literature 

 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

80.0 %Content

 

20.0 %Summarize Introduction

Description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study is either not complete or not clear.

Description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study is vague and/or insufficiently developed.

The reader is able to glean the purpose, intent, and scope of the study with effort.

The description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study, is detailed.

The description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study, is comprehensive and from current literature.

20.0 %Summarize Methodology

Description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study is either not complete or not clear.

Description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study is vague and/or insufficiently developed.

The reader is able to glean the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study with effort.

The description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study, is detailed.

The description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study, is comprehensive and from current literature.

20.0 %Summarize Results

Description of the data collected and the findings of the study is either not complete or not clear.

Description of the data collected and the findings of the study is vague and/or insufficiently developed.

The reader is able to glean data collected and the findings of the study with effort.

The description data collected and the findings of the study, is detailed.

The description of the data collected and the findings of the study, is comprehensive and from current literature.

20.0 %Summarize Conclusion

Critique of the presentation of the study and a summary assessment of the study are either not complete or not clear.

Critique of the presentation of the study and a summary assessment of the study are vague and/or insufficiently developed.

The reader is able to glean the critique of the study and the summary assessment of the study with effort.

The critique of the study and the summary assessment of the study are detailed.

The critique of the study and the summary assessment of the study are comprehensive and from current literature.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

20.0 %Mechanics of Writing

Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.

100 %Total Weightage