FOR EXCEPTIONAL PROFF ONLY

ASSE SSMENT R UBRIC – CASE STUDY HUMAN RIGHTS, PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT T1.2017 AS SESSMENT CR ITERIA UNS ATISFACTORY PASS CR EDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCT ION Compreh ension of the quest ion AND clarity of response . (40%) Does not dem onstrate an und erstanding of the qu estion. Uncl ear respon se; use key conc epts from the unit missing or used incorr ectly. Dem onstrates sat isfactory und erstanding of the qu estio n. Respon se is uneven in its clarit y; dra ws on some key concepts from the unit. Dem onstrates good und erstanding of the qu estio n. Respon se is clear; applies key conc epts of the unit but inco nsistent in their accurate appli catio n. Dem onstrates very good und erstanding of the questio n. Respon se is clear and concise; key conc epts of the unit applied accurately. Dem onstrates excellent und erstanding of the qu estio n. Respon se is clear and concise; sophi sticat ed und erstanding and application of key conc epts of the unit. Research and referencing. (30 %) Less than minimum recommended references used. No refe rencing or reference in text but not on reference list and/or vice versa . Minimum number of referenc es used. Reliance on non - academic sources. Re ferenced but s tudent needs to be referencing more frequently . Errors detected in referencing protocol both in -text and on reference list. Minimum number of sources used. Primarily utilized academic sources. Referenced; contains a few error s. Well researched (more than minimum).

Reliance on academic sources . Referenced; only minor error s in protocol . Thoroughly researched paper indicated in the balance of academic and non -academic sources used. Per fect or near perfect referencing. Wr itten express ion and ed iting. (15%) Extensive probl ems with gram mar, word usage and/or spel ling which makes it difficult to comprehend argument ; sho ws little evidence of proof reading. Several probl ems with gram mar, word usage and/or spel ling but basic argument can be comprehended . Requir es furt her proof reading. Good gram mar, word usage and/or spel ling – errors detected . Argument is comprehendible. Very g ood use of gramm ar, word usage and/or spelling – Argument articulated well though errors detected . Flawless gramm ar, word usage and/or spelling. Argument is clear and concise. Struct ure of argument and format ting . (15%) Ina dequate paragraphing and poor structur e. No attem pt to inclu de an intr oduction, main body and conclus ion. Poorly formatted. Some probl ems with paragraphing, but an atte mpt has been ma de to structure argument in logical manner . Some font and/or formatti ng inco nsistenc ies may be present. Prop er paragra phing for most of the assignme nt. Inclu des an introduction and conclus ion. Some minor formatti ng error s. Prop er paragraphing throughout; clear, logical structur e. Good formatti ng. Prop er paragraphing throughout, with a well writt en introduction and conclus ion. Clear, logical structur e. Fla wless formatti ng. MARKERS COMMENTS: