Weekly Report!!!

Running head: HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION 0







Human Resources Employee Management Solution, CAVS Inc.

Team B

Kimberly Manuel-Buckles

Luis Rosa

Javier Ardila

BA599 Capstone Project

Grantham University

April 6, 2017









Human Resources Employee Management Solution, CAVS Inc.

  1. Executive Summary

Scope and objectives

Employee management for any company is a vital requirement. This is because employees are the main resources that determine how the company operates and produce. For a company like CAVS, the human resource department has so many divisions and thus handles various kinds of employees with special and various skills and thus need to have all their files well managed. This human Resource Employee File Management solution will be connected with the PeopleSoft application used by the CAVS Inc.

Findings and recommendations

The project will takes into account all aspects of a project procedure including project assumptions, constrains, key performance indicators, risk assessment., the organization of the project team, the allocation of the project resources, provider the customers, the status of the project, the communication and governance plan, the escalation path, the communication path and the customer communication path. These metrics ensures the completeness of projects. They will lead to a complete development of a flawless project deliverable. This project should be able to yield a deliverable that will help many the whole Human Resource Department to handle all aspects of Employee management that includes their academic qualifications, work history, duties and responsibilities and their achievements among many more information.

Management Response

Based on the needs and the efficiency this project has been well received by the human resource management and thus accepted and approved the project development and to fully fund it.

Revision History

Version

Date Modified

Author

Description

0.6

04/06/2017

Team B

Executive Summary

0.5

03/31/2017

Team B

Customer

Project Status

Issue Management

Risk Management

Change Management

0.4

03/25/2017

Team B

Team Contact List

Project Resource Allocation

Provider

Customer

Post Implementation

Team Provider

0.3

03/18/2017

Team B

Constraints

Performance (Indicators)

High Level Deliverables

High Level Project

Timeline and Milestones

Risk Assessment

Project Team and Organization

0.2

03/08/2017

Team B

Goals and Objectives

Critical Success Factors

Project Methodology Waterfall

Deployment methodology

Scope

Assumptions

0.1

03/04/2017

Team B

Initial Version, Revisions, Draft

Approvers

The following individuals have been identified as the approvers for this document. Unless otherwise stated, approvals will be stored in the project folder.

Name

Title

Daniel Gilbert

Director, Human Resources - CAVS

Marc S. Price

Hiring Manager, process owner

Austin J. Carr

Director, Information Technology - CAVS

Cathy Roche

Project Sponsor- VP of Human Resources

Don Herron

CAVS Project Manager


Reviewers

The following individuals have been identified as reviewers for this document.

Name

Title

James O. Brewer

Vice President of Human Resources

Jennifer P. Gund

Chief of Human Resources

Steve Wallace

Chief of Accounting and Financial

Fred Johnson

Project Manager





Table of Contents

Human Resources Employee Management Solution, CAVS Inc. 2

1.0Executive Summary 2

Scope and objectives 2

Findings and recommendations 2

Management Response 3

Revision History 3

Approvers 4

Reviewers 5

About this Document 7

Approval and Sign Off 8

Primary Project Contacts 8

Project Overview 10

Critical Success Factors 11

Project Methodology 12

Waterfall Deployment Methodology 13

Scope 14

Assumptions 16

Constraints 19

Dependencies 20

Performance (Indicators) 20

High Level Deliverables 20

High Level Project Timeline and Milestones 21

Risk Assessment 21

24

Team B Organization Diagram 24

Team Contact List 24

Project Resource Allocation 25

Provider 25

Customer 25

Post Implementation Team 27

Provider 27

Customer 27

Project Status 27

Issue Management 27

Risk Management 28

Change Management 28

Communication and Governance (Control) Plan 29

Escalation Path 29

Communication Path 29

Customer Communication Path 29

30



















About this Document

Purpose

This document structures our partnership for project success. It clearly articulates:

  • Why the project is being executed

  • How it will be executed

  • Who is involved

Audience

This document is a shared by the entire project team - including resources and management from CAVS Inc., and Team B Consulting Services.

Approval and Sign Off

Approval of the Project Charter Document indicates an understanding of the purpose and content described in this deliverable. By signing this document, each individual acknowledges a shared commitment to project success and agrees that our work should commence with the necessary resources engaged as described.

Approver Name

Title

Signature

Date

Daniel L. Gilbert

Director, Human Resources

Marc S. Price

Hiring Manager

Austin J. Carr

Director, Information Tech.





Primary Project Contacts

Customer

Primary Contact

Name/Title/Organization

Phone

Email

Don Herron

CAVS Project Manager

216-555-4444

[email protected]

Marc S. Price

CAVS, Hiring Manager, process owner

216-333-2558

[email protected]

Luis Rosa

Project Manager, Team B Consulting Services

216-222-4445

[email protected]



Project Overview

Team B Consulting Services will provide services for the initiation, requirements analysis, implementation services, and project management to implement a Human Resources Employee File Management solution. The proposed solution will include the integration with CAVS, Inc. PeopleSoft application via Application Client Connector (ACC) to create a one-stop shop for personnel records.

Goals and Objectives

The Human Resources Employee Management solution is intended to make readily available the employee HR file to the appropriate individuals, while maintaining strict confidentiality of employees’ personal information. CAVS Inc. employee’s HR file consists of information secured during the hiring process, as well as all employee records created during the employment of the individual. The records derive from PeopleSoft Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), or are presented by the employee or others representing the employee. This solution is a one-stop shop for the HR staff and managers to access employee records by leveraging the existing PeopleSoft solution and the integration of the Team B Application.

No.

Description

Capture employee record-specific documents through ad-hoc scanning via a multifunction (MFD) device or via the software web client, or import documents via Application Client Connector (ACC).

Electronic employee record that will allow for quick access in a familiar three-category folder structure: Personnel, Medical, and Performance.

Primary document retrieval of the employee records stored in Team B Application will be completed using ACC directly from PeopleSoft.

Single sign on solution to synchronize user security values from PeopleSoft. To include adding or removing user group membership according to roles in PeopleSoft. This solution will also add or remove security keywords to ensure that each manager can only view HR documents for their employees in the Team B Application.

Deployed to the HR department and managers in all clinics and corporate departments

Critical Success Factors

The critical success factors are listed below. If any of these are not met, the project time line may slip and the budget may be exceeded.

No.

Factor

All Team B Application build requirements are provided before and validated during the Discovery Phase of the project.

After the Solution Requirements document has been created, it must be approved in a timely manner or the start of design phase may be delayed.

The project team must agree on tasks and timelines of the project plan. If there are any delays, the team will review, discuss and determine impacts of delays and next steps.

The project team must have access to a designated single point of contact having the authority to make important decisions relevant to project development.

The project team must have appropriately privileged remote access to the solution environment based on an agreed schedule.

The project team expects prompt responses to inquiries relevant to project development.

Project scope has minimal changes during the implementation of the software solution.

CAVS Inc will create user test scripts for testing the solution, and will provide testers to complete all scripts.

CAVS Inc is responsible for the configuration of MFD and document import processing.

10

Team B Consultant to conduct “train the trainer” sessions and CAVS Inc will provide end-user training sessions.


Project Methodology

This section describes Team B Consultant Services Project Implementation Methodology (PIM). The PIM is a proven approach to successfully implementing Team B Application Solutions. The Project Team uses the PIM to guide solution development and demonstrate well-ordered and measureable progress to our customers.

Weekly Report!!! 1

Initiation - Once contracts are finalized, the project is transitioned from the Sales team to the Team B Consultant Services team. A project team is identified and initial planning activities begin. The project approach is confirmed and the Project Charter is drafted.

Discovery - The project team engages with customer subject-matter experts (SMEs) to identify business process requirements and capture them in the Solution Requirements Document. The requirements are reviewed and revised to achieve mutual agreement and sign-off.

Implementation - The project team presents a prototype of the solution. The solution environment is configured to fulfill the requirements. The project team confirms the solution is ready for customer testing.

Training and Testing - The project team conducts train-the-trainer sessions. The customer conducts user acceptance testing. The project team supports the customer throughout the testing process.

Go-Live - During Go-Live, the project team confirms the customer’s organizational readiness and validates the solution in the production environment. The solution is deployed to end user workstations and the project team provides Go-Live support.

Project Close - The project team determines the disposition of any outstanding items. Support is transitioned to Team B Consultant Software Technical Support and the relationship is transitioned to the Sales team.

Waterfall Deployment Methodology

The diagram below represents the phases, activities and deliverables of a typical waterfall project at a high level. For agreed upon exceptions to this process, please review the Statement of Work (SOW) and implementation proposal.


Weekly Report!!! 2

Scope

The solution will include the following configuration:

  • Team B Consultant will configure up to twenty (20) document types to support the capture, classification and indexing of employee files.

  • The solution will also include the configuration of one (1) employee file management folder structure consisting of one (1) primary folder based on the employee ID and up to six (6) sub-folders for the categorization of the employee documents.

  • Team B Consultant will configure ACC to retrieve the employee file folder or an employee file subfolder from up to five (5) screens in PeopleSoft.

  • Team B Consultant will configure ACC for ad hoc importation of documents directly from up to five (5) screens in PeopleSoft. The employee ID from the PeopleSoft screen will be dynamically populated in the Team B Application index panel in order to reduce data entry errors.

  • Team B Consultant Developer will work with the customer to either directly implement PeopleSoft integration or support the customer's.

  • Team B Consultant will develop a process to synchronize user security values from a 3rd party application on a scheduled basis.

  • The solution will execute a database view or stored procedure provided by the customer to return the list of employee IDs with "changed” security attributes.

  • The solution will add or remove user group membership according to roles returned from third-party application; and

  • The solution will add or remove security keywords according to the organizational hierarchy returned from third-party application.

  • The security keyword configuration will ensure that each manager can view only HR documents for their employees in Team B Application.

  • The solution will be deployed to the HR department and managers in all clinics and corporate departments.

  • Document access will be based on the following:

  • Read and create access for the manager's employee's documents;

  • Read and create access for talent acquisition documents;

  • Up to four (4) access control groups will be created for HR personnel;

  • Web Client will be deployed as the main user interface for the solution; and

  • Users will be authenticated from PeopleSoft via existing single sign-on.

Assumptions
  • This proposal is based upon the below assumptions being true. If for some reason these assumptions prove not to be true, this could result in a scope change and may have an impact on the proposed cost and timeline to deliver.

  • The customer is responsible for the configuration of the MFD and document import processing.

  • The pages in PeopleSoft with links used to access documents in Team B Application will be controlled by specific roles and permissions in PeopleSoft.

  • Users will be authenticated from PeopleSoft via existing single sign-on,

  • Active Directory authentication, LDAP authentication, or manual authentication.

  • Additional single sign-on solutions may be quoted at customer's request;

  • The customer is responsible for developing database procedure(s) or view(s) to support security synchronization process:

  • The customer will provide a database view or stored procedure provided by customer to return list of employee IDs with change and security attributes;

  • The customer will provide a database view or stored procedure to return security role(s) for a user (e.g., manager, talent acquisition or employee); and customer will provide a database view or stored procedure which returns a list of EMPLIDs a given employee should have permission to view;

  • The customer will create a batch process from PeopleSoft to generate text files of employee metadata on a scheduled basis. Values required for this file will be determined during the Requirements Analysis phase;

  • PeopleTools 8.48 or above is required for this solution;

  • Team B Consultant developer will work with the customer to either directly implement integration or support the customer's support team.

For the Team B Consultant to directly implement integration, the following will be necessary:

  • Remote virtual private network (VPN) access to customer network and a desktop PC;

  • Access to software application and integration servers;

  • Access to a workstation or server with PeopleSoft AppDesigner installed and configured to reach PeopleSoft development/test environment;

  • Full developer access within PeopleSoft AppDesigner (i.e., ability to create and build objects);

  • Full access to menus in PeopleSoft Internet Architecture (PIA) under PeopleTools;

  • Administrative rights on Integration Server and PeopleSoft workstation;

  • Access to PeopleSoft development and or test application via web browser; and the ability to access and install files required for the integration;

  • The solution will include the configuration of up to twenty (20) document types to support the capture, classification and indexing of employee files;

  • The solution will also include the configuration of one employee file management folder structure consisting of one (1) primary folder based on the employee ID and up to six (6) sub-folders for the categorization of the employee documents.

Document access will be based on the following:

  • Read and create access for the manager's employee's documents;

  • Read and create access for talent acquisition documents;

  • Up to four (4) access control groups will be created for HR personnel; and any additional security models are out of the scope of this engagement.

  • Services may be performed onsite as well as remote;

  • Customer will make available appropriate HR and departmental staff during the Requirements Analysis and Testing phases; and the customer is responsible for any additional document type configuration, electronic forms, workflow, or security models related to the solution. Team B Consultant assistance may be procured to provide additional services by facilitation of a Change Order.

Constraints

Constraints are applicable restrictions that will affect the performance of the project. This could be any factor that affects when an activity can be scheduled, such as organizational structure, collective bargaining, project management team preferences, and staff assignments (PMI, 1996, 94).

No.

Description

1

CAVS code-freeze of all Solution environments and PeopleSoft environments from July 1, 2017 through September 1, 2017.

2

Society for Information Management (SIM) committee approval process for deployment to all the clinics.

3

Privacy Act and HIPAA guidelines that must be followed to prevent security breach


Dependencies

No.

Description

1

Timely approval of Solution Requirements Document (SRD) prior to solution design.

2

Timely approval of software solution prior to initiating user testing.

3

CAVS creation of user test scripts for testing the solution as well as providing testers to complete all scripts.


Performance (Indicators) High Level Deliverables

The following are the major deliverables to be created throughout the project life cycle:

Phase

Deliverable

Initiation

Work Agreement, Statement of Work and Professional Services Proposal

Engaging Global Services Document

Project Charter Document

Discovery

High Level Project Schedule

Solution Requirements Document (SRD)

Implementation

Once SRD has been approved, a detailed project schedule will be developed

Configured Solution

Testing/Training

Unit Test Plan

Solution Training Guide

Admin Guide

Two (2) software training sessions for “train-the-tester” and “train-the-trainer”

Go-Live

Installation Report

Onsite Support

Closing

Project Closure Document


High Level Project Timeline and Milestones

Major milestones and deliverables have been identified for this project. Note that based on the priority of the project, these dates may change. The milestones and deliverables are as follows:

Milestone/Deliverable

Planned Start

Planned Finish

Notes

Discovery (Initiation, Validation of Requirements and Solution Design)

May 2017

July 2017

Code Freeze

July 2017

September 2017

Implementation

October 2017

TBD

May be possible to start implementation prior to freeze.

Testing and Training

TBD

TBD

Go-Live & Go-Live Support


Risk Assessment

The following is a list of risks, corresponding impact levels and mitigation plans:

Risk

Level (Severity, Probability, and Detectability)

Mitigation Plan/Owner

Change in requirements during Discovery and Validation phase

High

Team B members will conduct a series of pre-meetings with the customer for security and infrastructure discussions. Any additional change in scope that impacts the project will be identified and discussed with the customer in a timely manner.

CAVS resources not able to provide the required time to assist with the project

Medium

Set clear expectations on time constraints from project team members at the beginning of the project.

Team B resources with limited flexibility due to other projects

High

Work closely with team leads to monitor availability and impacts with any schedule changes.

Customer code freeze dates and an inability to perform work in the environment

High

Licenses not available to the Administrative environment because they are being leveraged in other Solution instances

Medium

Complete a detailed review of the instance to be used for the project and the Infrastructure pre-discovery meeting to identify any gaps.

Since this is not a separate instance of Solution, there is a concern that Non-HR users or managers will be able to view all personnel files.

High

Ensure testing for a Non-HR or manager role for the solution will not allow testers to be able to view HR records.

Competing CAVS deployments of new systems and the manager's tolerance to accept/use the new system

Medium














Project Team and Organization

CAVS Organization DiagramWeekly Report!!! 3


Team B Organization DiagramWeekly Report!!! 4 Team Contact List

This list defines the project team consisting of Team B, Customer, and potentially outside consultants

Name

Company

Role

Email

Phone

Don Herron

CAVS

Project Manager

[email protected]

216-555-4444

Austin J. Carr

CAVS

Director, Information Technology

[email protected]

216-555-3333

Cathy Roche

CAVS

Project Sponsor- VP of Human Resources

[email protected]

216-555-3222

Marc S. Price

CAVS

Hiring Manager, process owner

[email protected]

216-555-2111

Luis Rosa

Team B

Project Manager

[email protected]

216-222-4445

Sandra White

Team B

Solution Developer

[email protected]

216-321-4446

Emily Wright

Team B

Technical Consultant

[email protected]

216-321-4447

Robert Sells

Team B

Solution Developer

[email protected]

216-321-4448


Project Resource Allocation

Involvement Levels

H = High, Heavy (60-100%)

M = Medium (33-60%)

L = Low, Ad-Hoc, As Needed (5-32%)

x = None or Not Applicable

Provider

Resource Types

Assigned Resource(s)

Initiation

Discovery

Implementation

Testing & Training

Go Live

Closing

Project Manager (PM)

Luis Rosa

TBD

Technical Consultant (TC)

John Diez

TBD

Solution Developer (CSG)

Javier Ardila

TBD

Solution Developer (CSG)

Kim Xu

TBD

Technical Support Analyst

Sean Doyle

TBD

Customer

Resource Types

Assigned Resource(s)

Initiation

Discovery

Implementation

Testing & Training

Go Live

Closing

Project Sponsor

Cathy Roche

Project Manager

Don Herron

System Administrator

Ray Perney

Subject Matter Expert(s) (SME)

Katrina Radisek

Application Specialist(s)

Mike Thomas

Test Plan Coordinator

Joe Madden

Testing Analyst

Cole Ziegler

Corporate Trainer

Jason Gurik

Infrastructure Support Analyst

Chris Wilson

Storage Analyst

Mike Wilson

Desktop Support

Giani Delpaggio

LAN Administrator

Rob Marcano

DBA

Gabe Zum


NOTE: Resource utilization rates are a product of past project experiences. When interpreting the tables above, please note that (1) the resource types defined under the Team B section may be filled by customer resources (2) the utilization rates may be high to account for a potential need or demand on a particular resource type during the life cycle of the solution and (3) values represented can be translated as “up to”, meaning a classification of ‘M’ (Medium) means the resource can be utilized up to 60% of the scheduled project phase. Depending on the size, scope and actual impact of individual solution areas (projects), the team may actually be a subset of these resources and actual utilization rates will be lower.

Post Implementation Team Provider

Resource Types

Assigned Resource(s)

Account Manager

Kim Manuel

Technical Support

Sean Doyle

Customer

Resource Types

Assigned Resource(s)

System Administrator

Ray Perney

Desktop Support

Giani Delpaggio

Help Desk

Myca Aguilar


Project Status

The purpose of issue management is to provide visibility and a means of communicating and resolving issues that impact the project. An issue can be defined as anything that may impede project progress. Issues should be resolved at the level at which they can be appropriately addressed. When an individual recognizes an issue, they should first attempt resolution through an informal conversation within the team. Those issues that cannot be resolved by the originator within the team should be raised to the project manager.

Issue Management

Open issues are added to the Project Status Portfolio and will be discussed with the Project Lead during project status meetings. If the issue is of a high priority, the Project Manager should discuss it immediately instead of waiting for the project status meeting. As issues arise, they are recorded in the issue log with the appropriate documentation. The issue log is used to track and record all issues associated with a project.

Risk Management

Risk Management is a process used to provide visibility to and management of project risks. Proper risk management helps to ensure that projects achieve their objectives in a timely fashion. Risks that are ignored or not addressed by the project team can cause delays, cost overruns, and even project failure.

Risks will be assessed by performing a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FEMA) with the Team B and CAVS teams. The outcome of this exercise is a list of project risks prioritized according to their severity (impact), likelihood of occurring (probability), and detectability. Once identified, mitigation steps will be discussed and documented for each risk. The status report will include risks and will be monitored on a regular basis.

Change Management

Change Management controls requested changes to scope, schedule, budget, or legal agreements that may occur during the project lifecycle. Robust planning and Change Management practices are followed to prevent unnecessary surprises later in the project. A change request can be any change in functionality, data, requirements, or legal terms not defined in the Solution Requirements documentation or legal agreements.

The following change control process will be followed:

  • Thoroughly record and classify the requested change.

  • Assess the impact to cost, schedule, resources, dependent, and parallel projects.

  • Present assessment and recommendation to project stakeholders.

  • Obtain decision from project stakeholders (approve, reject).

  • Update project plan to incorporate change:

Plan | Implement | Test | Update Documentation | Train | Close and Gain Acceptance

In an effort to partner and manage change effectively, the parties agree that a contractual change order will not need to be executed if the change comes within the agreed upon threshold below:

Project Name

% Change

Dollar Equivalent

<<project Name.>

<<% change>>

<<+- X dolalrs>>


If the change is within the agreed upon amount, the change will still be documented but via email with acknowledgements.

Communication and Governance (Control) Plan Escalation Path Communication Path Customer Communication Path













References

Gilchrist, A. (2015). A concise guide to software application development [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Project Management Institute. (1996). Project human resource management. Retrieved from

Rosen, A. (2017). Integrating agile scrum into the waterfall process [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Schwalbe, K. (2016). Information technology project management (Revised 8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Wysocki, R. (2012) Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme (7th Ed, Chapter 1-9) [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Kappelman, Leon A. (2009) The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture (1st Edition) [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Jeschke, Jeffrey. HIPAA Gray Areas [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Kendrick, T. 2015. Identifying and Managing Project Risk: Essential Tools for Failure-Proofing Your Project. 3rd Ed. AMACOM

Risk Assessment in Transport Companies, orpconference, retrieved from

http://www.orpconference.org/2008/actividades/documentar/EVALUACION.pdf