HCA 415 Final Paper
- Week 3 - Assignment 2
Course:HCA415 HCA415: Community & Public Health (HCK1711A)
Kristin Akerele4/8/2017 6:15:44 PM
View markup for B_Rouse HCA 415 Week 3 Assignment 2.docx
Great job on the assignment, Brenda! You do a great job discussing Snow's contributions and why they were important, but more is needed on the climate at the time and his personal beliefs. Thank you!
( 1.28 / 1.50) Describe your selected person’s experience
Proficient - Described their person's experience. Some minor details are missing.
Comments:
Good job describing the experience of your public health professional, however, some of the key details in the person's background were not mentioned. Remember, the focus is public health so you needed to mention what key elements were connected with this person that changed the face of public health.
( 0.96 / 1.50) Analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of political, socioeconomic, environmental and technological context in which this person worked
Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze the climate of the time period but does not include any of the required elements of political, socioeconomic, environmental and technological context in which this person worked. Or many of the relevant details are missing or incorrect.
Comments:
While you mentioned some of the climate of the time, you did not include the four elements required: political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological context.
( 0.96 / 1.50) Examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted their work
Below Expectations -Attempts to examine the personal beliefs of the person that prompted their work. Many relevant details are missing.
Comments:
You attempted to examine the personal beliefs of the individual; however, you basically recapped their experiences. Furthermore, you needed to connect the personal beliefs to their work. Personal beliefs are internal morals and values that inspired the person to do their work.
( 1.28 / 1.50) Examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task
Proficient - Examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task. Some minor details are missing.
Comments:
Good job looking at the adversities of the time but you did not connect it to the individual's work and how he/she had to overcome them.
( 1.50 / 1.50) Describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health
Distinguished -Effectively describes the final outcome of this individual's contribution to community and/or public health.
Comments:
Fantastic job describing the final outcome of this individual's contribution to public health. You provided a solid description of what he/she did to improve population health.
( 1.50 / 1.50) Explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time.
Distinguished - Fully explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time.
Comments:
Fantastic job explaining what this person's contribution did for the public's health at the time it occurred. You provided a solid explanation of how it changed population health.
( 1.50 / 1.50) Explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history
Distinguished -Effectively explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history.
Comments:
Fantastic job explaining why this particular contribution was so important at that time in history. You were able to explain what the contribution was, its importance in overall community health, and why it was so important at the time.
( 1.25 / 1.25) Critical Thinking: Evidence
Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.
Comments:
Great job! Your selection of scholarly sources adds credibility to your analysis. Your examples are relevant and move your argument forward.
( 1.25 / 1.25) Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Comments:
Great job! Your explanation demonstrates your understanding of the issue. Your examples support your argument.
( 0.50 / 0.50) PowerPoint Presentation: Sequencing and Organization
Distinguished - Information is exceptionally organized and there is a clear, logical progression of ideas.
( 0.50 / 0.50) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Comments:
Great work! The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct and add to the readability of your paper.
( 0.44 / 0.50) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.25 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Overall Score: 13.39 / 15.00
Overall Grade: 13.39
